Ejiro U Osiobe, Safia A. Malallah, Sajid Al Noor, Rauf I. Rauf, Davi Sofyan, Khairul Hafezad Abdullah, Waleed A. Hammood, Salah A. Aliesawi
The Ane Osiobe International Foundation (USA), Kansas State University (USA), Tennessee State University (USA), University of Abuja (Nigeria), Universitas Majalengka (Indonesia), Universiti Utara Malaysia (Malaysia), University of Anbar (Iraq)
This study examines the influence of cultural dimensions on governance and corruption perception, aiming to determine whether nations share more commonalities than differences. Using Hofstede’s six cultural dimensions—Masculinity, Power Distance, Individualism, Uncertainty Avoidance, Long-Term Orientation, and Indulgence—alongside the Corruption Perception Index (CPI), it analyzes governance structures across South America, Africa, Asia, and Europe. A quantitative approach employing Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient was used to assess cultural influences on corruption perception. Findings reveal that Power Distance increases as corruption worsens, particularly in South America and Europe, while Individualism negatively correlates with Power Distance across all regions. Masculinity and Uncertainty Avoidance show a strong negative correlation in South America, while Africa exhibits a significant negative correlation between Individualism and Power Distance. In Asia, Power Distance and Masculinity display a weak negative correlation, whereas Europe records the strongest correlation between Individualism and Power Distance. The study highlights the need to integrate cultural insights into governance reforms and anti-corruption policies. Countries with high Power Distance should enhance transparency, while collectivist societies should promote independent decision-making. Future research should explore regional governance mechanisms further to enhance global diplomatic and policy strategies.
Comments