Metin Kuş
Hitit University, Turkey
Program evaluation has undergone significant evolution, shaped by diverse theoretical perspectives and influential scholars. This study provides a historical analysis of leading theorists’ views and their impact on the field, tracing key developments from early accountability-focused models to contemporary, context-sensitive approaches. Beginning with foundational contributions from figures such as Tyler and Scriven, the analysis explores how theorists like Stake, Patton, and Stufflebeam have expanded the scope of evaluation through responsive, utilization-focused, and CIPP. The study highlights shifts from positivist, objective-oriented models to more participatory and stakeholder-centered frameworks, reflecting broader changes in educational and social science research paradigms. By examining the intellectual tradition and methodological shifts, this study provides insights into how program evaluation has adapted to evolving societal, institutional, and policy demands. Understanding these historical influences offers valuable perspectives for future advancements in evaluation practice and theory.
Comments