Law and Humanities
Quarterly Reviews
ISSN 2827-9735
Published: 17 March 2024
Problems with the Implementation of Parate Executie in Indonesia for Land as an Object for Debt Collateral
Jetha Tri Dharmawan, Ellydar Chaidir, Effendi Ibnu Susilo
Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1996.03.01.111
Pages: 149-155
Keywords: Parate Executive, Collateral Object, District Court Fiat
Abstract
When the debtor defaults on the agreed debt agreement, then legally the creditor has the right to the debt collateral object for payment of achievements that should be carried out by the debtor by executing it, but the implementation must of course be by applicable legal provisions. Execution of the debt guarantee object can be carried out by parate executie, by way of title executorial, or by way of a private sale. As for Parate Executie or direct execution on one's power, it is a practice of simplifying executions without having to involve the judiciary, which is quite simple, low cost, and relatively fast in time. Unfortunately, parate executives in Indonesia often cause problems in their applications. including because of its existence which currently exists or does not exist and is even considered the same as the concept of the executorial title, so its application becomes inconsistent. The existing problems cause the author to intend to conduct research that aims to find out what exactly is the cause of problems occurring in the implementation of parate executie and what are the solutions to overcome these problems. This research uses normative legal research methods using a statutory approach (statute approach) and a case approach (case approach) that are relevant to the object of the problem in this research. The results of the research from the author's research to find out what are the real problems in implementing parate executie in Indonesia are that there are inconsistent arrangements and implementation and there is confusion in the arrangement which originally regulated 3 (three) types of execution that can be taken by creditors against collateral objects of mortgage rights Also included here is the object of fiduciary guarantees if the debtor defaults (default), namely the exercise of executorial title, parate executie on his own power and underhanded execution, but in the end, it is no longer different and all must get fiat from the Chair of the District Court.
References
Juhaenda Hasan, Legal Aspects of Material and Individual Guarantees, Business Law Development Foundation, Jakarta, 2000.
M. Isnaeni, Mortgage as a Guarantee Institution in the Indonesian Legal Framework, Journal of Economic Law, Edition V, August 1996.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Philosophy of Indonesian Law Reform, 2002.
______, Legal Research, Kencana, Jakarta, 2010
Restowulan Sutantio, Research on Legal Protection for Credit Guarantee Execution, National Legal Development Agency-Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, 1999.
Soerjonono & Mamudji, Normative Legal Research A Brief Overview, Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2018.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, A. Pitlo, Chapters on Legal Findings, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung, 1993.
Soetiksno, Philosophy of Law (Part 1), Pradnya Pramita, Jakarta, 2002.
M. Yahya Harahap, Resistance to Execution of Grosse Acte and Court and Arbitration Rules and Standards of Execution Law, PT. Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung, 1993.
Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, Mortgage, Principles, Main Provisions and Problems Faced by Banking A Study of Laws, Alumni, Bandung, 1999.
Savira, J., & Setyorini, D. (2022). Juridical Review of the Execution of Mortgage Rights on Freehold Land. Trisakti Law Reform, 4(4), 975-988.
Asril, J. (2020). Some Problems Related to Mortgage Rights as Guarantee Institutions for Land. MEA Scientific Journal (Management, Economics, & Accounting), 4(2), 492-510.
Fahlevi, ED, & Sihombing, IE (2023). EXECUTION PARATE OF LAND PROPERTY AS DEBT COLLATERAL. Trisakti Law Reform, 5(1), 191-200.