Law and Humanities
Quarterly Reviews
ISSN 2827-9735
Published: 08 October 2022
A Critical Appraisal of the New Bail Regime Under the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 –
An Examination of American Experience
Gambo Abdulsalam, Ibrahim Sule
Nigerian Law School Kano Campus
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1996.01.04.29
Pages: 1-12
Keywords: Criminal Justice, Sanction Model, Children, Conflict, Bail
Abstract
When the Administration of Criminal Justice Act,2015 was enacted, the purpose among others, was the protection of the rights of the suspect/defendant and the society from crime. In the prosecution of its purpose, the Act provides for the defendant’s right to bail subject to the discretion of the court to stipulate deposit of money among other terms as a condition for the bail. Furthermore, the Act provides for the establishment of professional surety regime whereby registered bondsmen are allowed to stand surety for defendant on the payment of fees to be determined on agreement with the defendant. The consequence is the growth of bail industry at Abuja and other cities of Nigeria, where bondsmen force relations of defendants to contribute money in payment of their charges in the same manner as ransom is contributed to kidnappers for the freedom of their loved ones in detention. In this paper, the writer appraised the security implication of the new bail regime on Nigeria and its implication on the right of the defendant to presumption of innocence enshrined in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended). In the course of so doing, the writer uses the doctrinal research method and drew from the American experience on the subject before arriving at conclusion.
References
Akande I.F., (2021), Synergising the Effect of Corruption on Law and Policy in National Development, An Inaugural Lecture Series No. 01/21, Ahmadu Bello University Press Limited, Zaria, Kaduna State Nigeria, pp. 6 – 8.
Akin I., Clement N. (1992), the Bail Process and Human Rights in Nigeria, Constitutional Rights Project, Surulere Lagos, pp. 18 – 28.
Bryan A.G., (2014), Black’s Law Dictionary 10th Edition, Thomson Reuters, U.S.A., p. 168
Stringent Bail Conditions Responsible for Prison Congestion Lawyers, www.vanguardngr.com/2019, Accessed on 28/11/2021: 10:00 a.m
Okorie Ajah et. al., (2020), Ameliorating the Flight of Awaiting Trial Inmates in Ebonyi State Nigeria Through Reasonable Bail Conditions, www.researchgate.net. accessed on 27/11/2021: 7:53
Oladele O.O., (2017), Independence of the Judiciary: The Nigerian Experience, Bowen Law Journal Volume 1(2), Faculty of Law, Bowen University, Iwo Osun State - Nigeria P. 244
Olusegun A., (2019), Justice in Nigeria and the Lucrative Business of Bail, www.thecable.ng 27/11/2021: 6:00 p.m.
Onyekpere E., (1996), Justice for Sale, Toma Micro Publishers Limited, Lagos, p. 136
Cases
Abacha vs The State (2002) F.W.L.R. (Part 98) p. 863
Bamaiyi vs. The State (2001) N.W.L.R. part 715 p. 210
Eyu vs The State(1988) 2 N.W.L.R. (PART 78) P. 602.
Fawehinmi vs The State (1990) 1 N.W.L,R.(Part 127) p.486
Meregini vs F.R.N. (2018) 12 N.W.L.R. (Part 1633) p. 331 at 333 Ratios 1,2 &3
Metuh vs F.R.N. (2020) 7 N.W.L.R. (Part 1723) p. 325 at 329 Ratio 2
Meregini vs F.R.N. (2018) 12 N.W.L.R. (Part 1633) p. 331 at 333 Ratios 1, 2,3 &
Munir vs F.R.N. (2009) ALL .F.W.L.R. (Part 500) R 775
Obekpa vs. C.O.P. (1980) 1 N.C.L.R. P. 113.
Paul vs The State (2019)12 N.W.L.R. (Part 1685) p.54 at 59 Ratio 5
Suleiman vs. The Commissioner of Police (2008) 8 N.W.L.R.(Part 1089) p. 298
Suleiman vs. The Commissioner of Police (2008) 8 N.W.L.R.(Part 1089) p. 298