top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Law and Humanities
Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2827-9735

Judge Gavel
 Scales of Justice
City Crowds
People in Library
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 07 November 2024

Settling Investor-State Disputes in the GCC: A Critical Analysis of the Challenges under International Investment Law

Abdulelah Alsahli

University of Jeddah

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1996.03.04.133

Pages: 42-50

Keywords: Investor State Dispute Settlement, ISDS, arbitration, GCC, ICSID

Abstract

The study critically analyses the challenges and obstacles encountered in resolving investor-state disputes within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states under the framework of international investment law. The number of established bilateral investment treaties involving GCC states has increased over the past decade to promote foreign direct investment. Most treaties include arbitration provisions as a method of dispute resolution, often governed by international institutions such as the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). However, the difficulty lies in balancing state sovereignty with investor protection in accordance with international investment law. The analysis reveals several anticipated challenges faced by host states due to the growing number of bilateral treaties, particularly as foreign investors raise claims that challenge the host state's regulatory rights. GCC states must adopt measures that limit the risks associated with the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism. The study outlines a series of recommendations to address these challenges while also protecting foreign investors.

References

Argentina - Germany Bilateral Investment Agreement (1991)
Bahrain - United Kingdom Bilateral Investment Treaty (1991)
Blythe, S. E. (2013). The Advantages of Investor-State Arbitration as a Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Bilateral Investment Treaties. The International Lawyer, 47(2), 273–290. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43923951
Cleis, M. N. (2017). The independence and impartiality of ICSID arbitrators: Current case law, alternative approaches, and improvement suggestions. Brill. http://10.1163/9789004341487
Dagbanja, D. N. (2022). The investment treaty regime and public interest regulation in Africa. OUP Oxford.
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of international investment law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001
Dotzauer, M. (2023). The popular legitimacy of investor-state dispute settlement: Contestation, crisis, and reform. Taylor & Francis.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. (n.d.). Database of member states. World Bank Group. https://icsid.worldbank.org/about/member-states/database-of-member-states. Accessed 2 Oct. 2024.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. (n.d.). ICSID caseload - statistics. World Bank Group. https://icsid.worldbank.org/resources/publications/icsid-caseload-statistics. Accessed 2 Oct. 2024.
International Monetary Fund. (2018, December 4). Trade and foreign investment—Keys to diversification and growth in the GCC: Policy paper. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/PP/2018/pp120618gcc-trade-and-foreign-investment.ashx. Accessed 5 Oct. 2024.
Jennings, M. (2016). The international investment regime and investor-state dispute settlement: States bear the primary responsibility for legitimacy. Business Law International, 17(2), 127-151. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2799957
Khor, M. (2015). Why we should kick the investor-state dispute settlement out of trade agreements. Third World Resurgence, (296/297). https://www.twn.my/title2/resurgence/2015/296-297/cover05.htm
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia - Japan Bilateral Treaty (2013)
McLaughlin, J. T. (1979). Arbitration and developing countries. International Lawyer, 13(2), 211-235.
Mexico - United Arab Emirates Bilateral investment treaty (2016)
Myburgh, A., & Paniagua, J. (2016). Does international commercial arbitration promote foreign direct investment? The Journal of Law & Economics, 59(3), 597-627. https://doi.org/10.1086/689188
Oman - US Bilateral Investment Treaty (1990)
Papanastasiou, T. N. (2015). The legal protection of foreign investments against political risk: Japanese business in the Asian energy sector. Quid Pro, LLC.
Shekhar, S., (2016). ‘Regulatory chill’: Taking right to regulate for a spin . Centre for WTO Studies, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade. https://wtocentre.iift.ac.in/workingpaper/%27REGULATORY%20CHILL%E2%80%99%20TAKING%20RIGHT%20TO%20REGULATE%20FOR%20A%20SPIN%20(September%202016).pdf
Sornarajah, M. (2010). The international law on foreign investment (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
State of Kuwait - Republic of India Bilateral treaty (2001)
Taniguchi, Y., & Ishikawa, T. (2016). Balancing investment protection and other public policy goals: Lessons from WTO jurisprudence. In J. Chaisse & T.-y. Lin (Eds.), International economic law and governance: Essays in honour of Mitsuo Matsushita (pp. 77-104). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778257.003.0007
The International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (1965)
The State of Qatar - Republic of turkey Bilateral Treaty (2001)
The United Nations Charter (1945)
Tienhaara, K. (2011). Regulatory chill and the threat of arbitration: A view from political science. In C. Brown & K. Miles (Eds.), Evolution in investment treaty law and arbitration (pp. 606-627). Cambridge University Press. https://10.1017/CBO9781139043809.034
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (n.d.). International investment agreements. Investment Policy Hub. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (n.d.). Investment dispute settlement: Bahrain. Investment Policy Hub. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/country/15/bahrain. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (n.d.). Investment dispute settlement: Saudi Arabia. Investment Policy Hub. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/country/185/saudi-arabia. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (n.d.). Investment dispute settlement: United Arab Emirates. Investment Policy Hub. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/country/220/united-arab-emirates. Accessed 4 Oct. 2024.
Van Harten, G. (2007). Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.001.0001

bottom of page