What Influences Pension Funds’ Investment Decisions in Tanzania?
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 23 May 2024

What Influences Pension Funds’ Investment Decisions in Tanzania?

Josephat Lotto

The Institute of Finance Management

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.07.02.492

Pages: 110-129

Keywords: Investment Decision, Political Interference, Investment Guidelines, Ethical Guidelines

Abstract

This paper aimed at examining the influence of political interference, investment guidelines and investment ethical guidelines on pensions investment decision in Tanzania. The structural equation modelling was employed to analyse primary data collected using five-point Likert scale structured questionnaires with closed-ended questions. The study reveals that political interference has a negative influence on investment decisions, indicating that increased political interference leads to a decrease in the quality of investment decisions. To ensure quality investment decisions, governance mechanisms should be strengthened, promoting independence and insulating investment managers from undue political pressures. The negative influence of political interference on investment decisions highlights the need for establishment of robust governance mechanisms to safeguard against undue political pressures. Conversely, investment guidelines demonstrate a positive influence, where following guidelines directives enhance investment decisions. This underscore the importance of well-defined and comprehensive investment guidelines that provide clear directions, criteria and restrictions. By establishing a framework for decision-making, investment guidelines can enhance the quality of investment decisions within pension funds. However, the study found no significant influence of ethical guidelines on investment decisions, suggesting that ethical guidelines do not play a significant role in shaping the investment decisions of pension funds in Tanzania. This finding raises questions about the effectiveness of ethical guidelines in ensuring quality pensions funds investment decisions. While ethical guidelines may not directly shape investment decisions, it is important for the funds to recognize the broader societal and reputational implications of their investment practices. Funds should consider incorporating ethical considerations into their investment frameworks.

References

  1. Anderson, K., Zwan, N., & Wiß, T. (2019). Pension funds and sustainable investment: Comparing regulation in the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Netspar academic series.

  2. Abbasi, G. A., Sandran, T., Ganesan, Y., & Iranmanesh, M. (2022). Go cashless!

  3. Determinants of continuance intention to use E-wallet apps: A hybrid approach using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Technology in Society, 68, 101937.

  4. Armstrong, C.E., & Shimizu, K. (2007). A review of approaches to empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 33(6), 959-986.

  5. Aluchna, M., & Aluchna, T. (2019). Determinants of social responsibility in the public pension system. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 6(3), 23-38.

  6. AfDB. (2021). ‘Africa long-term finance initiative: Annual Report 2020’. Abidjan: AfDB. Available at: https://altf.afdb.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/Africa%20Long-Term%20Finance%20Initiative%20-%202020%20Annual%20Report.pdf (accessed 2 1 March 2023).

  7. Akomea-Frimpong, I., Tenakwah, E. S., Tenakwah, E. J., & Amponsah, M. (2022). Corporate Governance and Performance of Pension Funds in Ghana: A Mixed-Method Study. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10 (1), 5.

  8. Andonov, A., Hochberg, Y. V., & Rauh, J. D. (2018). Political representation and governance: Evidence from the investment decisions of public pension funds. The Journal of Finance, 73 (5), 2041-2086.

  9. Aslan, R. G. (2023). "Agency problems in the private pension system of Turkey: pension sector employee perspectives", Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 142-159.

  10. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

  11. Barr, N. (2018). Economics of the welfare state. Oxford University Press.

  12. Berger, A. N., & Hann, R. N. (2013). The efficiency of public sector pension plans: The cost of alternative allocations of pension contributions. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 12(4), 369-394.

  13. Bodie, Z. (2021). Social Security: An Overview. The Journal of Retirement, 9(2), 73-85.

  14. Bradley, D., Pantzalis, C., & Yuan, X. (2016). The influence of political bias in state pension funds. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(1), 69-91.

  15. Bregnard, N., & Salva, C. (2022). Pension fund board governance and asset allocation: evidence from Switzerland. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 1-25.

  16. Chande, Z. (2016). Governance of Tanzanian pension fund investment. Central and Eastern European Journal of Management and Economics (CEEJME), (3), 189-209.

  17. Chansuchai, P., Phawitpiriyakliti, C., & Pungnirund, B. (2022). Good Governance, Management Policies, and Management Achievement Affecting the Sustainability of the Government Pension Fund (GPF). Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 4292-4301.

  18. Clark, G. L., & Monk, A. (2010). The Norwegian government pension fund: Ethics over efficiency. Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, 3(1).

  19. Chepkoech, S. H. A. R. O. N., Rotich, G., & Ndambiri, A. (2017). Factors affecting investment decisions of pension schemes in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 4(24), 432-452.

  20. Chinazam, I. M., & Nnaemeka, A. E. (2023). Imperative of Pension Scheme in

  21. Achieving Employee Performance in Nigeria: A Focus on the Pension Reform Act 2014. American Journal of Economics and Business Management, 6(1), 43-65.

  22. Clark, G. L., & Urwin, R. (2008). Best-practice pension fund governance. Journal of Asset Management, 9(1), 2-21.

  23. Clark, G.L., & Monk, A.H. (2012). The scope of financial institutions: in-sourcing, outsourcing, and off-shoring. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(4), 817-841.

  24. Dixon, A.D. (2008). The rise of pension fund capitalism in Europe: an unseen revolution? New Political Economy, 13(3), 249-270.

  25. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th Ed.). Sage publications.

  26. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.

  27. Etikan, I., & Babtope, E. A. (2019). Sampling and sampling methods. Biom Biostat Int J, 9(1), 1-3.

  28. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.

  29. Fadhil, D. M. (2019). Factors Influencing Real Estate Investment Decisions in Social Security Funds: A Case of Zanzibar Social Security Fund, Saudi Journal of Economics and Finance. 5(8), 330-341.

  30. Fadhil, D. M. (2021). Factors influencing real estate investment decisions in social security funds: A case of Zanzibar Social Security Fund. Saudi Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(8), 330-341.

  31. Farooq, U., Tabash, M. I., Al-Naimi, A. A., & Drachal, K. (2022). Corporate Investment Decision: A Review of Literature. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), 611.

  32. Ganesha, A., & Aithal, P. S. (2022). Mono Method Approach to Research: A Theoretical Analysis. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education, 6(1), 17-26.

  33. Glatzer, M. (2021). Social Security as a Funded Public Pension System. In The Future of Social Security Pensions (pp. 21-32). Springer

  34. Grujicic, M., & Nikolic, M. (2021). Survey strategy in research: advantages and limitations. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering, and Education, 9(2), 63-68.

  35. Gupta, P., Tuna, I., & Yuksel, H. (2020). Governing social security schemes in a principal-agent setting. Journal of Financial Services Research, 58(2), 121-146.

  36. Gruneald, A. (2021). From benefits and beneficiaries; the historical origins of old agepensions from a political regime perspective. Comparative political studies.

  37. Gu, X., Hasan, I., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Political influence and financial flexibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 99, 142-156.

  38. Hart, S.L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.

  39. Hasa, S., & Salva, C. (2020). Do pension funds manage cash efficiently? Available at SSRN 3695118.

  40. Hawley, J. P., & Williams, A. T. (2007). Universal owners: challenges and opportunities. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(3), 415-420.

  41. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2017). Multivariate data analysis (8thEd.). Cengage Learning.

  42. Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74-91.

  43. Idrizi, O., & Shahini, B. (2018). Albanian challenges towards an efficient pension system. ENTRENOVA-ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 4(1), 1-13.

  44. ILO. (2017). World Social Protection Report 2017-2019: Universal social protection to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. International Labour Office.

  45. ILO. (2020). World Social Protection Report 2017-2019: Universal social protection to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. International Labour Organization.

  46. IMF. (2018). Fiscal Monitor: Capitalizing on Good Times. International Monetary Fund.

  47. Jensen, O. A., & Seele, P. (2013). An analysis of sovereign wealth and pension funds' ethical investment guidelines and their commitment thereto. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3(3), 264-282

  48. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

  49. Jung, W., & Kwon, O. (2017). Political interference and public pension fund performance: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 16(3), 304-320.

  50. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

  51. Juvonen, K., A. Kumar, B.H. Ayed, and A.O. Marin (2019). ‘Unleashing the Potential of Institutional Investors in Africa’. Working Paper 325. Abidjan: AfDB.

  52. Kumatongo, C., & Muzata, K. (2021). Philosophical positions in social research: A reflective appraisal of the relevance of ontology and epistemology in the context of educational research. Journal of Educational Foundations, 5(1), 1-19.

  53. Kusiluka, M. and Kongela, S. (2020) A Case for Real Estate Inclusion in Pension Funds Mixed-Asset Portfolios in Tanzania. Current Urban Studies, 8, 428-445.

  54. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10.

  55. Leavy, P. (2017). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. Guilford publications.

  56. Lotto, J., & Isaka, I. (2020). On understanding the implication of pension debt on fiscal policy in Tanzania: Is there any room for improving the adequacy of pension benefits? Cogent Economics & Finance, 8(1), 1838690.

  57. Mazreku, I.., Morina, F, & Curraj, E. (2020). Evaluation of the Financial Performance of Pension Funds. Empirical Evidence: Kosovo, Albania and North Macedonia. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 161.

  58. Mitchell, O. S., Hammond, P. B., & Maurer, R. (2021). Sustainable Investment in Retirement Plans: Introduction.

  59. Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Cross-sectional study design: A brief review. American Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 5(5), 326-331.

  60. Mpinga, Z. C., & Westerman, W. (2017). Public Pension Fund Structure and Mechanisms: A Case Study of the Tanzanian Pension Funds System. The Central European Review of Economics and Management (CEREM), 1(1), 135-160.

  61. Musalem, A. R. and Palacious, R. J. (Ed) (2019), Public Pension Fund Management. Washington: The World Bank.

  62. Mwakisisile, A. J. (2018). Asset Liability Management for Tanzania Pension Funds (Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University Electronic Press).

  63. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

  64. National Audit Office of Tanzania. (2023). Performance Audit Report on Management of Property Investment as Implemented by NSSF and PSSF. Retrieved from https://www.nao.go.tz/uploads/Performance_Audit_Report_on_Management_of_Property_Investments_as_Implemented_by_NSSF_and_PSSF.pdf.

  65. OECD. (2017). Investment governance and integration in public pension funds. OECD Publishing.

  66. OECD. (2019). Pensions at a Glance 2019: OECD and G20 Indicators. OECD Publishing.

  67. Oribhabor, B. J., & Anyanwu, R. U. (2019). Sampling techniques and sample size determination in research. International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences, 9(1), 1-11.

  68. Priem, R.L., & Butler, J.E. (2001). Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22-40.

  69. Pokorný, J., & Hejduková, P. (2021). Pension Funds: Administrative and Investment Cost. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 115, p. 02006). EDP Sciences.

  70. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

  71. Park, J., Kim, H. J., & Kim, S. S. (2020). Positivism in Tourism Research: A Review and Future Prospects. Journal of Travel Research.

  72. Richards, D. W., Ahmed, A. D., & Bruce, K. (2022). Ethics in financial planning: Analysis of ombudsman decisions using codes of ethics and fiduciary duty standards. Australian Journal of Management, 47(3), 401-422.

  73. Rahi, S., Mansour, E. A., & Alghizzawi, M. (2019). The role of source credibility in online information adoption. Kybernetes.

  74. Razavi, S. M., Bozorgasl, M., & Amiry, M. (2020). Long-Range Planning of Asset Allocation in Pension Funds: An Application of Scenario Planning. Journal of Executive Management, 12(23), 41-65.

  75. RisCura (2020). ‘BrightAfrica Report 2019’. Available at: www.riscura.com/wpcontent/uploads/2021/03/Bright_Africa_Report_2019.pdf (accessed on 2ndAugust 2022).

  76. Shiau, W. L., Sarstedt, M., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Internet research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Internet Research.

  77. Schäublin, J. J. (2022). Swiss pension funds: funding ratio, discount rate, and asset allocation. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 158(1), 1-23.

  78. Svara, J. H. (2021). The ethics primer for public administrators in government and nonprofit organizations. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  79. Sileyew, M. (2019). Basic concepts of research design. Educational Research Journal, 10(1), 1-13.

  80. Seran, P., Sucahyo, U. S., Atahau, A. D. R., & Supramono, S. (2023). The Efficiency of Indonesian Pension Funds: A Two-Stage Additive Network DEA Approach. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(1), 28.

  81. Taherdoost, H. (2019). Importance of validity and reliability in questionnaire development process. In Validity and reliability of a questionnaire (pp. 3-14). InTech.

  82. Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.

  83. Tembo, A., & Akintola, O. (2022). Research philosophy in applied social research: Reflections on the relevance of ontology and epistemology to applied social research. African Journal of Social Work, 12(1), 7-18.

  84. Turyahikayo, F. (2021). Positivist philosophy and its implications for field research in social sciences: A critical review. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Religion, 59, 11-24.

  85. UN Women. (2015). Progress of the world's women 2015-2016: Transforming economies, realizing rights. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.

  86. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

  87. UNPRI. (2021). About the PRI. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/about-the-pri

  88. Wanjohi, E. N. & Kariuki, P. W. (2019). The relationship between asset allocation and fund performance of occupational pension schemes in Kenya. International Academic Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(4), 47-63

  89. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.

  90. World Bank. (2020). Global Economic Prospects: Poverty and Distributional Implications of COVID-19. World Bank Group.

  91. Wilson, F. R., & Pan, W. (2016). Measurement invariance and external validity of single-item measures across diverse populations. Evaluation Review, 40(1), 68-85.

  92. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics, an Introductory Analysis, 2nd Edition, New York: Harper and Row.

  93. Zhao, Z., & Sutcliffe, C. (2021). What determines the asset allocation of defined? benefit pension funds? Applied Economics, 53(36), 4178-4191.

  94. Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., & Andriukaitienė, R. (2018). Philosophy and paradigm of scientific research. Management Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility, 13-36.

bottom of page