top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 30 January 2021

The Driving Factor for Stability of Voter Turnout in Southeast Asia: The Evidence from Malaysian and Indonesian Elections

Husnul Isa Harahap

Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.04.01.252

Pages: 82-92

Keywords: General Election, Voter Participation, Civic Duty, Rational Behaviour, Candidate Orientation, Democracy

Abstract

The objective of the study was to describe voter participation (turnout) in South East Asia, particlarry in Indonesian and Malaysian elections from 2004–2019, and the factors that cause stable participation. The participation of voters (turnout) in Malaysia’s elections from 2004–2018 is 73.90–84%. The participation of voters in Indonesia’s elections from 2004–2019 is 70.99–84.09%. This means that voter participation in the last three election periods was stable in both countries. This study shows that four factors cause stable participation: political awareness, rationality, political perceptions, and electoral orientation that is candidate-oriented. The theoretical implication of this study was to strengthen Timothy Feddersen and Alvaro Sandroni, and John G. Matsusaka’s theory about voter political participation or voter behaviour on election day. The originality of this study is that there are special characteristics behind stable political participation in Indonesia and Malaysia. Methods of data collection in this study is based on literature study and analytical method uses the descriptive analysis method. This study also uses a political comparison approach to analyse data.

References

  1. Acuña-Duarte, A. A. (2017). Electoral Apathy Among Chilean Youth: New Evidence for the Voter Registration Dilemma. Estudios Gerenciales, 33(145), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.estger.2017.11.005

  2. Aktar, T. (2020). Democratic Election in Myanmar: Political Transition and Challenges. 48(1), 59–69.

  3. Alapuro, R. (2006). The Construction of the Voter in Finland, C. 1860-1907. Redescriptions. Yearbook of Political Thought and Conceptual History, 10(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.7227/R.10.1.4

  4. Aritonang, D. R. (2014, Mei). KPU: Partisipasi Pemilih di Pemilu Legislatif 2014 Capai 75,11 Persen. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2014/05/10/0211249/KPU.Partisipasi.Pemilih.di.Pemilu.Legislatif.2014.Capai.75.11.Persen.

  5. Besar, J. A. (2017). Tingkah laku pengundi dan pilihan politik di kawasan Parlimen Pasir Mas, Kelantan. UKM Press, 13(3), 97–111.

  6. Bilska-Wodecka, E., & Matykowski, R. (2015). Influence of social and religious factors in Polish Sejm elections, 2001–2007. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 30(30). https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/bog/30/30/article-p7.xml

  7. Bonica, A. x. (2016). A Data-Driven Voter Guide for U.S. Elections: Adapting Quantitative Measures of the Preferences and Priorities of Political Elites to Help Voters Learn About Candidates. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(7), 11–32. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.7.02

  8. Bonifácio, R., & Paulino, R. (2015). Corruption and Political Participation in the Americas and the Caribbean. Brazilian Political Science Review, 9(2), 54–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-38212014000200011

  9. Brunei Darussalam. (2020). ElectionGuide is a resource provided by the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES). http://www.electionguide.org/countries/id/33/

  10. Brunei Darussalam: Constitution and politics. (2020). Commonwealth Secretariat. https://thecommonwealth.org/our-member-countries/brunei-darussalam/constitution-politics

  11. Chalermpalanupap, T. (2019). Thailand’s Recent Elections: Disappointments, Surprises and Non-surprises. Perspective, 31(April), 1–8.

  12. Comşa, M. (2017). Explaining Turnout Decline in Post-Communist Countries: The Impact of Migration. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia, 62(2), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/subbs-2017-0010

  13. Cortina, J., & Rottinghaus, B. (2019). Vote centers and turnout by election type in Texas. Research and Politics, 6(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053168019864224

  14. Croissant, A., & Lorenz, P. (2018). Comparative Politics of Southeast Asia an Introduction to Governments and Political Regimes. Springer. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=77xEDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

  15. Curran, K. (2018). E-Voting on the Blockchain. The Journal of The British Blockchain Association, 1(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-1-2-(3)2018

  16. Durán, I. M. (2018). Television and electoral results in Catalonia. SERIEs, 9(4), 423–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13209-018-0183-3

  17. Editorial Staff. (2014, July 23). Partisipasi Pemilih di Pilpres 2014 Menurun, Ini Penjelasan KPU. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-2646389/partisipasi-pemilih-di-pilpres-2014-menurun-ini-penjelasan-kpu

  18. Editorial Staff. (2019a, March 24). Thailand votes in first general election since 2014 military coup. Dw.Com. https://www.dw.com/en/thailand-votes-in-first-general-election-since-2014-military-coup/a-48041612

  19. Editorial Staff. (2019b, March 24). Vote count under way in first Thai poll since 2014 coup. France24.Com. https://www.france24.com/en/20190324-thailand-election-first-vote-2014-military-coup-junta-king-maha-vajiralongkorn

  20. Election for Vietnamese National Assembly. (2016). [Election Guide]. International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES). http://www.electionguide.org/elections/id/2766/

  21. Feddersen, T., & Sandroni, A. (2006). A Theory of Participation in Elections. The American Economic Review, 96(4), 1271–1282.

  22. Final Election Observation Report on Cambodia’s 2013 National Election. (2013). Transparency International Cambodia. http://ticambodia.org/library/wp-content/files_mf/1438020883TICsReporton2013NationalElection.pdf

  23. Fionna, U. (2008). Political Parties in Singapore, Malaysia, and The Philippines: Reflection of Democratic Tendencies. Makara Sosial Humaniora, 12(2), 65–71.

  24. Fionna, U., & Hutchinson, F. E. (2019). Indonesia’s 2019 Elections: A Fractured Democracy? Asian Affairs, 50(4), 502–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2019.1672400

  25. Funston, J. (2018). Malaysia’s 14th General Election (GE14) – The Contest for the Malay Electorate. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 57–83.

  26. GE 14 Results Overview. (2020). Star Media Group Berhad. https://election.thestar.com.my/

  27. Germann, M., & Serdült, U. (2014). Internet Voting for Expatriates: The Swiss Case. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 6(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v6i2.302

  28. Ghoshal, B. (2013). Democratic Transition in Myanmar: Challenges Ahead. India Quarterly, 69(2), 117–131. JSTOR.

  29. Goertz, J. M. M., & Chernomaz, K. (2019). Voting in Three-Alternative Committees: An Experiment. Games, 10(20), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/g10020020

  30. Hai, L. H. (2002). Electoral Politics in Malaysia:‘Managing’ Elections in aPlural Society. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/01361005.pdf

  31. Head, J. (2014, February 2). Thailand election disrupted by protests. Bbc.Com. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-26003995

  32. Hernández-Huerta, V. A. (2016). Negative Advertisements and Voter Turnout: The Evidence from Mexico. Colombia Internacional, 92, 135–156. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint92.2017.05

  33. Holliday, W. H., & Pacuit, E. (2019). Strategic Voting Under Uncertainty About the Voting Method. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, 297, 252–272. https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.297.17

  34. Hong, V. T. A. (2016, July 6). Infographic: Vietnam’s 2016 national elections. Customnews.Vn. https://customsnews.vn/infographic-vietnams-2016-national-elections-43.html

  35. Huat, C. B. (2007). Political Culturalism, Representation and the People’s Action Party of Singapore. Democratization, 14(5), 911–927. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701635720

  36. Humas. (2019, March 26). Naik 61% Dibanding 2014, Anggaran Penyelenggaraan Pemilu 2019 Capai Rp25,59 Triliun. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. https://setkab.go.id/naik-61-dibanding-2014-anggaran-penyelenggaraan-pemilu-2019-capai-rp2559-triliun/

  37. Ivanenko, K. A. (2013). Social-Psychological Determinants of Electoral Voting Behavior. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 3, 77–84.

  38. Kersting, N. (2009). Voting Behaviour in the 2009 South African Election. Africa Spectrum, 44(2), 125–133.

  39. Kok, L. M. (2015, September 12). GE2015: Voter turnout at 93.56 per cent, improves slightly from 2011 record low. Straitstimes.Com. https://www.straitstimes.com/politics/ge2015-voter-turnout-at-9356-per-cent-improves-slightly-from-2011-record-low

  40. Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU). (2020). [Official Website]. https://www.kpu.go.id/

  41. Kongkirati, P. (2016). Thailand’s Failed 2014 Election: The Anti-Election Movement, Violence and Democratic Breakdown. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1166259

  42. Kristensen, N. N., & Solhaug, T. (2016). Students as First-time Voters: The Role of Voter Advice Applications in Self-reflection on Party Choice and Political Identity. Journal of Social Science Education, 15(3), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/jsse-v16-i1-1503

  43. Lamprianou, I. (2013). Contemporary Political Participation Research: A Critical Assessment. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-30068-4_2

  44. Lane, M. (2019). The 2019 Indonesian Elections: An Overview. Perspective, 49(14June), 1–9.

  45. Lao People’s Democratic Republic. (2020). ElectionGuide is a resource provided by the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES). http://www.electionguide.org/countries/id/118/

  46. Lewis, S. (2016, May 23). Vietnam Gets to Vote in Elections, but the Communist Party Picks Who’s on the Ballot. Time.Com. https://time.com/4344416/vietnam-elections-independent-communist/

  47. Lim, K. A. (2020, June 17). The dummy’s guide to Singapore’s political parties: The WP edition. AsiaOne.Com. https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/dummys-guide-singapores-political-parties-wp-edition

  48. Lim, T. (2010). Doing Comparative Politics: An Introduction to Approaches and Issues. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

  49. Manikas, P. (2004). Report on the 2004 Philippine Elections. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs. https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/1745_ph_elections_083104_body_1.pdf

  50. Matsusaka, J. G. (1995). Explaining voter turnout patterns: An information theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 84(1–2), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047803

  51. Michalak, P. (2019). Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Predicting Voter Turnout Based on the Analysis of Demographic Data. Polish Cartographical Review, 51(3), 109–116. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/pcr-2019-0010

  52. Mohd Nizar Sudin, Mohd Fuad Mat Jali, & Junaidi Awang Besar. (2016). Tingkah laku pengundi Melayu terhadap UMNO di negeri Kedah: Satu tinjauan awal. UKM Press, 12(14), 79–85.

  53. Mohd Sani, M. A. (2014). Malaysia’s 13th General Election: Political Partisanship in the Mainstream Print Media. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 24(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X14539186

  54. Moten, A. R., & Mokhtar, T. M. (2006). Asian Survey, 46(2), 319–340.

  55. Nadzri, M. M. N. (2018). The 14th General Election, the Fall of Barisan Nasional, and Political Development in Malaysia, 1957-2018. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 37(3), 139–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341803700307

  56. Nargesian, A., Aghbolaghi, D. T., & Dindar, Y. (2014). The impact of political marketing tools in public participation: Case study: The citizens of region five in Tehran, Iran. مدیریت دولتی, 6(3), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.22059/jipa.2014.50761

  57. Petty, M. (2016, May 22). Day of democracy in communist Vietnam in vote on party’s parliament. Reuters.Com. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vietnam-politics/day-of-democracy-in-communist-vietnam-in-vote-on-partys-parliament-idUSKCN0YC0RE

  58. Political Parties in Singapore. (2018). [Singapore Election]. Singapore Election. http://www.singapore-elections.com/political-parties.html

  59. Portal Rasmi Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya Malaysia (SPR). (2020). [Official Website]. https://www.spr.gov.my/

  60. Press Releasepolling Day Voter Turnout – Singapore General Election 2015. (2015). Elections Department. https://www.eld.gov.sg/press/2015/Press%20Release%20on%20Polling%20Day%20Voter%20Turnout.pdf

  61. Quiroga, M. M., & Cabello, B. R. (2018). The Effect of Political Generations on Electoral Participation: The Case of Chile, 1999-2013. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 26(52), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2652-011-2018

  62. Roberts, D. (2002). Democratization, Elite Transition, and Violence in Cambodia, 1991-1999. Critical Asian Studies, 34(4), 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1467271022000035910

  63. Ščepka, D., Lincényi, M., & Kučera, M. (2016). An Overview of the Factors Influencing the Voter Turnout and Influence of the Weather. Geografická Revue, 12(1), 20–35.

  64. Searight, A. (2019, March 22). Thailand’s First Elections Since Its 2014 Coup [Interview]. https://www.csis.org/analysis/thailands-first-elections-its-2014-coup

  65. South-Eastern Asia. (2020). [Agency Website]. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). https://www.idea.int/data-tools/region-view/30/40

  66. South-Eastern Asia Voter Turnout Database—Parlementary Data for 11 Countries. (2020). International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA). https://www.idea.int/data-tools/region-view/30/40

  67. Stadelmann, D., & Torgler, B. (2013). Bounded Rationality and Voting Decisions over 160 Years: Voter Behavior and Increasing Complexity in Decision-Making. PLoS ONE, 8(12), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084078

  68. Stott, D. A. (2019). Indonesia’s 2019 Elections: Democracy Consolidated? The Asia-Pacific Journal, 17(6), 1–19.

  69. Strengthening Electoral Processes and Democratic Practices in Cambodia: Report on Forums on Elections and Democratic Space (pp. 1–49). (2011). [Forums on Elections And Democratic Space Project]. Cambodian Center for Human Right. https://cchrcambodia.org/admin/media/report/report/english/2011-07-20-report-eng.pdf

  70. Stuart-Fox, M. (2007). LAOS: Politics in a Single-party State. Southeast Asian Affairs, 161–180. JSTOR.

  71. Thailand Saphaphuthan Ratsadon (House of Representatives). (2014). Inter-Parliamentary Union. http://archive.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/in_transition/Thai-HR_E.htm

  72. Timor-Leste Parliamentary Elections july 22, 2017 (pp. 1–57). (2017). International Republican Institute (IRI). https://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/fields/field_files_attached/resource/final_election_observation_report_timor-leste_2017.pdf

  73. Tozer, T. (2016). Increasing Electoral Turnout Among the Young: Compulsory Voting or Financial Incentives? Intergenerational Justice Review, 2(1), 18–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.24357/igjr.8.1.448

  74. Werdiningsih, R. P. (2013, March 25). Ada 12 partai jadi peserta pemilu 2014. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/ada-12-partai-jadi-peserta-pemilu-2014

  75. Yandri, P. (2017). The Political Geography of Voters and Political Participation: Evidence from Local Election in Suburban Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 49(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.11315

bottom of page