Lifestyle-Related Shaming: The Significance of Reintegrative Shaming on Drug Relapse Offenders in Indonesia
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 04 March 2021

Lifestyle-Related Shaming: The Significance of Reintegrative Shaming on Drug Relapse Offenders in Indonesia

Muh Ardila Amry, Adrianus Meliala

University of Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.04.01.260

Pages: 145-153

Keywords: Shaming, Reintegrative, Stigmatitative, Drug Relapse, Crime

Abstract

In statistical calculations, drug abusers with the status of drug relapse in Indonesia reached 70% in 2019 (National Narcotics Agency: 2019). This condition illustrates that the social rehabilitation mechanism for drug abusers in Indonesia still has the opportunity to present shameless. Therefore, this study seeks to see the significance of Lifestyle-related shaming as an important part of the mechanism for implementing shaming for the shameless, especially drug relapse offenders in urban areas. This study was conducted based on the analysis of John Braithwaite's shaming theory which states that the public's response to perpetrators is divided into 2 (two) namely reintegrative shaming which means re-acceptance of the shameless by giving shame to them and stigmatization which means treating the shameless by giving a negative stigma permanently. The method used here was literature review by utilizing and trying to develop existing theories (grounded theory) by presenting concepts (variables) in accordance with the affordability of study data so as to produce new findings regarding the significance of Lifestyle-related shaming in its role for drug relapse offenders. Lifestyle-Related Shaming is part of a combination of reintegrative shaming theory, desistance theory and routine activity theory. In the literature study conducted, the combination of (3) three macro theories produces Lifestyle-related shaming which is closely related to urban lifestyle. It is expected that later, this study will be able to provide a broad understanding to the government to prepare the best program for solving shameless phenomenon, especially drug abuse in Indonesia. Furthermore, it is also useful in science as a basis for the application of shaming in Indonesia.

References

  1. Braithwaite, John. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press

  2. Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. New York: Free Press.

  3. Corrigan, D. (2006). Undestanding Subtances and Subtance Use. South Western Area Health Board.

  4. Edelhertz, H. (1970). The Nature, Impact and Prosecution of White Collar Crime.Washington: US Departement of Justice Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.

  5. Michel, P. (2008). Financial Crimes: The Constant Challenge of Seeking Effective Prevention. Journal of Financial Crime, 383-397.

  6. Gottschalk, P., & Glaso, L. (2013). Corporate crime does pay! The Relationship between Financial Crime and Imprisonment in White-Collar Crime. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences , 63-78.

  7. Gottschalk, P. (2013). Empirical Differences in Crime Categories by White-Collar Criminals. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 17-26.

  8. Emerson, E. (2003). Timing of Adult Social Bonds and Desistensi from Crime. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers.

  9. Braithwate, J. (1989). Reintegrative Shaming. Australian National University.

  10. Miethe, T. D., Lu, H., & Reese, E. (2000). Reintegrative Shaming and Recidivism Risks Drug Court: Explanations for Some Unexpected Findings. Crime and Delinquency Vol 46 No 4.

  11. Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2019). Data Statistik Kasus Narkoba. Retrieved from BNN.id: https://puslitdatin.bnn.go.id/portfolio/data-statistik-kasus-narkoba/

  12. Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2013). Relapse (Kambuh). Retrieved from Bnn.go.id: https://bnn.go.id/kambuh-relapse/#:~:text=Kambuh%20atau%20Relapse%20merupakan%20terjadinya,narkoba%20berlangsung%20kembali%20secara%20rutin.&text=Sebabnya%20relapse%20bagi%20keluarga%20korban%2C%20berarti%20menghilangkan%20harapan%2C%20kiamat.

  13. WHO. (2011). Rehabilitation. Retrieved from who.com: https://www.who.int/health-topics/rehabilitation#tab=tab_1

  14. DH. (2006). Wired for Health Drug Use and Misuse –Definitions. Retrieved from Department of Health: http://www​.wiredforhealth​.gov.uk/doc.php?docid=7489.

  15. Walters, G. D. (2014). Lifestyle Theory: Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.

  16. Blackman, S. (2014). Subculture Theory: An Historical and Contemporary Assessment of the Concept for Understanding Deviance. Deviant Behavior, 35:6, 496-512,.

  17. Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. New York: Free Press.

  18. Downes, D. M., & Rock, P. (2007). Understanding Deviance: A Guide to the Sociology of Crime and Rule-breaking (5th ed.).Oxford University Press.

  19. Coe, G. (1961). Delinquency and Opportunity. The Free Press.

  20. Miller, J., & Copes, H. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Criminology. UK: Florence Production Ltd.

  21. Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications.

  22. Wu, S., & Fraser, M. (2016). Author Guidelines for Manuscripts Reporting on Qualitative Research.https://doi.org/10.1086/685816.

  23. Persson, U. (2016). Is Falsification Falsifiable? Foundations of Science Volume 21 Number 3.

  24. Praharsi, Y. (2006 ). Pemodelan Data Kualitatif dengan Program NVIVO. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI).

  25. Adzrago, D. (2019). Rehabilitation Processes involved in Rehabilitating Individuals with Alcohol and Drug Addictions at Rehabilitation Centres in Ghana. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy.

  26. Afiyanti, Yati. 2008. Focus Group Discussion (Diskusi Kelompok Terfokus) Sebagai Metode Pengumpulan Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Volume 12, No. 1, Maret 2008; hal 58-62.

  27. Braithwaite, J., & Mugford, S. (1994). Conditions of successful reintegration ceremonies. British Journal of Criminology, 34(2), 139-70.

  28. Murphy, K., & Harris, N. (2007). Shaming, Shame And Recidivism: A Test of Reintegrative Shaming Theory in the White-Collar Crime Context. The British Journal of Criminology , 900-917.

  29. Nugraha, Windia & Susilo Handoyo. (2019). Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Penanganan Dan Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Narkotika Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Di Kota Balikpapan. DE FACTO VOL. 6, No. 1 Juni 2019.

  30. Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2019). Indonesia Report Drug 2019. PUSLITDATIN BNN.

  31. National Collaborating Center for Mental Health. (2008). Drug Misuse: Psychosocial Interventions.The British Psychological Society and The Royal College of Psychiatrists.

  32. NIDA. (2016). Understanding Drug Use and Addiction. National Institute on Drug Abuse.

  33. Ariwibowo, K. (2013). Stigma Negatif Menjadi Faktor Utara Mantan Pecandu. Retrieved from dedihumas.bnn.go.id: https://dedihumas.bnn.go.id/read/section/berita/2013/06/28/675/stigma-negatif-menjadi-faktor-utara-mantan-pecandu-relapse

  34. Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2019). Data Statistik Kasus Narkoba. Retrieved from BNN.id: https://puslitdatin.bnn.go.id/portfolio/data-statistik-kasus-narkoba/

  35. Badan Narkotika Nasional. (2019). Penggunaan Narkotika di Kalangan Remaja Meningkat. Retrieved from BNN.go.id: https://bnn.go.id/penggunaan-narkotika-kalangan-remaja-meningkat/

  36. Hambali, S. (2017). Why Indonesia’s drugs problem is getting worse despite ‘shoot on sight’ orders and draconian laws. Retrieved from South China Morning Post: https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/article/2120688/why-indonesias-drugs-problem-getting-worse-despite-shoot-sight-orders-and

  37. WHO. (2011). Rehabilitation. Retrieved from who.com: https://www.who.int/health-topics/rehabilitation#tab=tab_1

bottom of page