A Study of the Relationship between Political Institutions and Democratic Amalgamation in Bangladesh
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 26 June 2020

A Study of the Relationship between Political Institutions and Democratic Amalgamation in Bangladesh

Akkas Ahamed, Md. Sayedur Rahman

University of Chittagong (Bangladesh), Begum Rokeya University (Bangladesh), National Research University Higher School of Economics (Russia)

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.03.02.189

Pages: 540-549

Keywords: Bangladesh, Political Institutions, Democratic Amalgamation, Parliament, Judiciary, Civil Society, Bureaucracy

Abstract

In almost all political systems political institutions play an important role in promoting democracy and democratization. The political institutions are the groups in a political system that create, enforce, and apply laws for the benefit of the society. They regularly arbitrate conflict, make governmental policies on the local and national economies and socio-political systems, and then offer representation for the people of the country. In general, democratic political systems are divided into two forms: presidential which is headed by a president; and parliamentary which is headed by a parliament. Party systems can be two-party or multiparty and the political parties can be strong or fragile depending on their level of inner harmony. The political institutions are those bodies, parties, parliaments, and heads of government, that create the entire apparatus of the present-day governments. In terms of political system, Bangladesh has been trying to exercise the democratic polity. Its legislature is unicameral where the Prime Minister is the head of government and the President is the head of the state. Besides, it is a developing country with enormous socio-economic and political problems that need to be addressed to reach the goals of millennium development and sustainable development. In this paper the relationship between the political institutions and democratic amalgamation has been discussed. And at the end of the study some policy recommendations have been provided to strengthen the prevailing democratic culture.

References

  1. Ahamed, Akkas. & Datta, Sujit Kumar.(2015).”Unsustainable Practices of Democracy in Bangladesh: A Critical Review” Bangladesh Political Studies, Department of Political Science, University of Chittagong, Vol. XX, 2015.

  2. Ahmed, Moudud, (1995). Democracy and The Challenge of Development: A Study of Political and Military Intervention in Bangladesh; Dhaka: The University Press Limited.

  3. Ahmed. Nizam, (2011) Parliament and democratic consolidation in Bangladesh, Australasian Parliamentary Review, Spring 2011, Vol. 26(2), 53–68.

  4. Ahmed, Nizam (2010). ‘Party Politics Under a Non-party Caretaker Government: The Fakhruddin Interregnum’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 48(1) pp. 23–47.

  5. Bichitra, (1992). “Jokhon Montry Chilam” June 19.

  6. Blandford, K., and Jaeger, R.(2011). Profile: Bangladesh, The Fund for Peace (No. Chazan, N.(1988). Ghana: Problems of Governance and the Emergence of Civil Society. In L.Diamond, J.J. Linz & S.M Lipset (Eds), Democracy in Developing Countries: Africa Boulder, Co: Lynne Reinner, 93-140.

  7. Chowdhury, Mahfuzul H. (2012). Democracy in Bangladesh; Dhaka: A. H. Development Publishing House.

  8. Diamond, L, Linz J.J & Lipset S.M.(1992). Democracy in Developing Countries: Persistence, Failure and Renewal, Boulder, Co; Lynne Reinner.

  9. Diamond, L. (1988). Class, Ethnicity, and Democracy in Nigeria: The failure of the First Republic, London: McMillan; and Syracuse University Press.

  10. Diamond, L. (1988c). Nigeria: Pluralism, Statism, and the Struggle for Democracy. In: Diamond, L.; Linz, J.J. and Lipset, S.M. (Eds) Democracy in Developing Countries: Africa Boulder, Co: lynne Reinner.

  11. Fuchs, C. (2008). Deconstructive Class Analysis: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Examples for the Analysis of Richness and the Class Analysis of the Media and the Culture Industry, ICT&S Research Paper, No.4. Salzburg: University of Salzburg.

  12. Feroz, Jalal (2015). Bangladesh Sangorshik Rajniti and Parliament; Dhaka: Moula Brothers.

  13. Global Integrity. (2010). Bangladesh Integrity Scorecard 2007, 2008, 2010. Washington, D.C.: Global Integrity.

  14. Haussmann R,; Pritchett, L. and Rodrik, D. (2004). Growth accelerations, NBER Working Paper no 10566.

  15. IGS. (2008). State of Governance in Bangladesh 2008. Institute of Governance Studies, Dhaka.

  16. Jahan, Rounaq (2015). Political Parties in Bangladesh Challenges of Democratization: Dhaka: Prothoma Prokashan.

  17. Karim, Rezaul (2004). Party Constitution Followed the Daily Star 13th Anniversary Issue on line; Retrieved January 14, 2007. URL:www.thedailystar/net/supplements/ann:2004.

  18. Khan, M. M. (2009). Administrative Reforms in Bangladesh. Dhaka: UPL.

  19. Koechlin, T. (2013). The Rich Get Richer: Neoliberalism and Soaring Inequality in the United States. Challenge, 56 (2):5-30.

  20. Kokole, L., and Mazrui, A.A. (1988). Uganda: the Dual Polity and the Plural Society. In: L Diamond, J.J Linz & S.M Lipset (Eds). Democracy in Developing Countries: Africa, Boulder, Co: Lynne Reinner.

  21. Latouche, S. (1997). Paradoxical Growth. In: Rahnema, M. and Bawtree, V. (eds). The Post-Development Reader. London: Zed Books Ltd

  22. Linz, J.J. and Stephen, A.(2001). Toward Consolidated Democracy, the Global Divergence of Democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  23. Linz, J.J. and Stephen, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Consolidation: southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  24. Mahajan, S. (2005). Analysis of Growth Experience, In: Ahmed. S (ed), Transforming Bangladesh into a middle income economy, Macmillan India.

  25. Maniruzzaman, Talukder (1975). Radical Politics and the Emergence of Bangladesh; Dacca: Bangladesh Books International Ltd.

  26. Mankiw, N.G.; Romer, D. and Weil, D.N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 407–437.

  27. Mosca, G. (1939). The Ruling Class: Elementi di Scienza Politica. New York: Free Press (Original Work Published in 1896).

  28. Mujeri, M.K. and Sen, B. (2003). A Quiet Transition: Some aspects of the history of economic growth in Bangladesh 1970-2000, Bangladesh Country Paper, Global Research Project, World Bank.

  29. North, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  30. O’Donnell, G and Schmitter, P.C. (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies.Baltimore; Johns Hopkins University Press.

  31. Odhikar. (2010). Human Rights Monitoring Report, Dhaka

  32. Odhikar. (2012). Statistics: Political Violence, Retrieved from http//: www.odhikar.org/Upload%20statistics/Political.pdf. Accessed on February 20, 2015

  33. Quamrun Nahar, M. (2017). The Role of Political Parties in Democracy: Bangladesh Perspective, Social Science Journal, No.21, 2017, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh, ISSN-1728-1474

  34. Rahman, Md. Saidur, (2010). “Institutionalization of Democracy in the Political Parties in Bangladesh”; Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, North South University, Bangladesh

  35. Rahman, M, (2008). Democracy in Crisis; Dhaka: The University Press Ltd.

  36. Siddiqui, Mustafizur Rahman, (2013). Democratization in Bangladesh; Dhaka: A.H. Developing House.

  37. Tasnim, F. (2007). Civil Society in Bangladesh: Vibrant but Vigilant, Japan: University of Tsukuba.

  38. The Daily Star, (2007). “Practice of Democracy and Our Political Parties”, The Daily Star, February 6.

  39. Zakaria, F. (2012). In Middle East, Democracy Deficit Has Roots in History. Time Magazine, April 16, 2012, retrieved from http: www.time./time/magazine/article/09171,211124800.html on 10/03/2015

  40. Zakaria, S. M. (2013). Democratic Consolidation in Bangladesh: A Reality Check, Institute of Governance Studies, IGS Working Paper series No. 16/2013, BRAC University, Dhaka

bottom of page