top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Health and Medical Sciences

ISSN 2622-7258

Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.09 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.24.02 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.57 AM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-12 at 1.23.52 AM.png
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 21 January 2023

Study of Functional Outcome of Cervical Laminoplasty with Fixation Versus Cervical Laminoplasty without Fixation for Multiple Levels for Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score

Abdullah Alzahrani, Mohammad Abdullah Alhasani, Fahad Al Jeaid

Taif University, Saudi Arabia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1994.06.01.252

Pages: 1-4

Keywords: Cervical Laminoplasty, Fixation, Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, Orthopedic Association Score

Abstract

Objective: To determine functional outcome of cervical laminoplasty with fixation versus without fixation for multiple levels of cervical spondylitis myelopathy. Cervical laminectomy is the standard operation for multiple cervical stenosis, which need decompressive surgery, however it is associated with significant number of recurrence and instability if it is not associated with posterior cervical fixation , usually the disease happens as a result go aging in old people mainly and most of the patients are old and fixation need times and expert, this makes the development of laminoplasty which lead to less instability which if it done in proper way it will not need fixation, in this study I review the outcome in patient have laminoplasty and fixation with patient who did not have associated fixation. Materials and Methods: 50 diagnosed cases of multiple level cervical myelopathy at king Abdulazaiz Hospital in Taif between 2012—2013 were retrospectively analyzed at, 1-year using MJOA. Results: 25 patients underwent 4 levels cervical laminoplasty with posterior lateral mass fixation compared to the same number of patients have 4 level cervical laminoplasty without fixation. The correlation between Duration of Symptoms to Preoperative and postoperative MJOA was statistically significant. We noted statistically significant improvement in symptoms of axial neck pain, radicular arm pain, and gait disturbances post operatively at one year in both groups. No difference between the group who had fixation with the group who did not regarding the improvement of symptoms and functional improvement. Conclusion: Functional outcomes in operated patients at 1-year follow up are the same after laminoplasty with or without fixation. But using fixation increases time of surgery. Symptoms of axial neck pain; radicular arm pain, clumsy hand and gait disturbances show significant improvement at one year follow up. While bladder and bowel involvement showed the least recovery. Significant improvement in function occurs 1 year postoperatively.

References

  1. Basu S, Sreeramalingam R 2012 Adjacent level spondylodiscitis after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Indian J Orthop., 46: 360-363.

  2. Bernard TN Jr, Whitecloud TS 3rd 1987 Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. Anterior decompression and stabilization with autogenous fibula strut graft. ClinOrthopRelatRes., 149-160.

  3. Burkhardt JK, Mannion AF, Marbacher S, Dolp PA, Fekete TF, et al. 2013. A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated and radiographic outcome after 2 types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy. Neurosurg Focus, 35: E4.

  4. Burkhardt JK, Mannion AF, Marbacher S, Dolp PA, Fekete TF, et al. 2013 A comparative effectiveness study of patient-rated and radiographic outcome after 2 types of decompression with fusion for spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervical discectomy versus corpectomy. Neurosurg Focus., 35: E4.

  5. Chagas H, Domingues F, Aversa A, Vidal Fonseca AL, de Souza JM 2005. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. SurgNeurol., 64 Suppl 1: S1:30-35.

  6. Ding C, Hong Y, Liu H, and Shi R, Song Y, et al. 2013. Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. ActaOrthopBelg., 79: 338-346.

  7. Ebersold MJ, Pare MC, Quast LM 1995. Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. J Neurosurg., 82: 745-751.

  8. G Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata M, Shichikawa K, Shimomura Y. 1985. Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br., 67: 609-615.

  9. LaRocca H. 1988. Cervicalspondylotic myelopathy: natural history. Spine Phila Pa., 1976 13: 854-855.

  10. Lin Q, Zhou X, Wang X, Cao P, Tsai N, et al. 2012 A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J., 21: 474-481.

  11. Liu X, Min S, Zhang H, Zhou Z, Wang H, et al. 2014. Anteriorcorpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J., 23: 362-372.

  12. Song KJ, Lee KB, Song JH 2012 Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J., 21: 1551-1557.

  13. Wen ZQ, Du JY, Ling ZH, Xu HD, Lin XJ 2015. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: systematic review and a meta-analysis. TherClin Risk Manag., 11:161-170.

  14. Yan D, Wang Z, Deng S, Li J, Soo C 2011 Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with titanium mesh cage and dynamic cervical plate for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly osteoporosis patients. ArchOrthop Trauma Surg., 131:1369-1374.

bottom of page