Economics and Business
Quarterly Reviews
ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)
Published: 13 December 2024
Research Trends and Networks in Sustainability Reporting: A Bibliometric Approach
Afif Yoga Perdana, Ari Kuncara Widagdo, Rahmawati, Siti Rochmah Ika
Universitas Sebelas Maret (Indonesia), Universitas Janabadra (Indonesia)
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1992.07.04.638
Pages: 292-300
Keywords: Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability Reporting
Abstract
This study uses a bibliometric analysis method to examine the development and trends in sustainability reporting (SR) research from 2014 to 2024. Increased awareness of sustainability and the development of international regulations and standards have driven the importance of sustainability reporting, which includes reporting information on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects, in the modern business world. We conducted this analysis using data from the Scopus database and VOSviewer software for network visualization and statistical analysis. The results show that SR topics are often associated with corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance, with the geographical distribution of research dominated by developed countries such as the UK, Italy, and the US. In addition, the author's network visualization reveals clustering by research topic, which facilitates the analysis of linkages and collaboration among authors. This research provides useful guidance for researchers and practitioners in understanding the sustainability research landscape and strategically directing future studies, as well as helping policymakers design more effective policies to encourage sustainability reporting.
References
Agyei-Mensah, B. K. (2019). The effect of audit committee effectiveness and audit quality on corporate voluntary disclosure quality. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 10(1), 17–31.
Al Lawati, H., Hussainey, K., & Sagitova, R. (2021). Disclosure quality vis-à-vis disclosure quantity: does audit committee matter in Omani financial institutions? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 57(2), 557–594.
Amorelli, M., & García‐Sánchez, I. (2021). Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 537–554.
Benameur, K. B., Mostafa, M. M., Hassanein, A., Shariff, M. Z., & Al-Shattarat, W. (2024). Sustainability reporting scholarly research: a bibliometric review and a future research agenda. Management Review Quarterly, 74(2), 823–866.
Bosi, M. K., Lajuni, N., Wellfren, A. C., & Lim, T. S. (2022). Sustainability reporting through environmental, social, and governance: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 14(19), 12071.
De Micco, P., Rinaldi, L., Vitale, G., Cupertino, S., & Maraghini, M. P. (2021). The challenges of sustainability reporting and their management: the case of Estra. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 430–448.
Di Vaio, A., Syriopoulos, T., Alvino, F., & Palladino, R. (2021). “Integrated thinking and reporting” towards sustainable business models: A concise bibliometric analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(4), 691–719.
Diwan, H., & Amarayil Sreeraman, B. (2024). From financial reporting to ESG reporting: a bibliometric analysis of the evolution in corporate sustainability disclosures. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 13769–13805.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.
Haque, F., & Jones, M. J. (2020). European firms’ corporate biodiversity disclosures and board gender diversity from 2002 to 2016. The British Accounting Review, 52(2), 100893.
Hongming, X., Ahmed, B., Hussain, A., Rehman, A., Ullah, I., & Khan, F. U. (2020). Sustainability reporting and firm performance: The demonstration of Pakistani firms. Sage Open, 10(3), 2158244020953180.
Khemakhem, H., Arroyo, P., & Montecinos, J. (2023). Gender diversity on board committees and ESG disclosure: evidence from Canada. Journal of Management and Governance, 27(4), 1397–1422.
Mahmood, Z., Blaber, Z. N., & Khan, M. (2024). Institutionalisation of sustainability reporting in Pakistan: the role of field-configuring events and situational context. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 21(2), 219–251.
Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2017-0024
Moodaley, W., & Telukdarie, A. (2023). Greenwashing, sustainability reporting, and artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(2), 1481.
Murdayanti, Y., & Khan, M. N. A. A. (2021). The development of internet financial reporting publications: A concise of bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 7(12).
Rinaldi, L. (2020). Integrated thinking for stakeholder engagement: A processing model for judgments and choice in situations of cognitive complexity. In The Routledge handbook of integrated reporting (pp. 280–292). Routledge.
Rochmah Ika, S., & Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2012). Audit committee effectiveness and timeliness of reporting: Indonesian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(4), 403–424.
Santos, C., Coelho, A., & Marques, A. (2024). The greenwashing effects on corporate reputation and brand hate, through environmental performance and green perceived risk. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16(3), 655–676.