Non-Linear Effect of Government Spending on Private Consumption in Cambodia: Markov-Switching Autoregressive Model
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Economics and Business

Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, managemet journal
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 30 March 2020

Non-Linear Effect of Government Spending on Private Consumption in Cambodia: Markov-Switching Autoregressive Model

Leanghak Hok

University of Miskolc (Hungary), Prek Leap National Institute of Agriculture (Cambodia)

asian institute research, jeb, journal of economics and business, economics journal, accunting journal, business journal, management journal

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1992.03.01.210

Pages: 438-449

Keywords: Private Consumption, Government Investment, Government Consumption, Markov-Switching Autoregressive Model, Cambodia

Abstract

The influence of government expenditure on private consumption has been debated among scholars. Some studies have found a positive linkage between the two while some others have found a negative one. In this study, the Markov-Switching Autoregressive (MSAR) model was used to investigate the non-linear impact of government spending on private consumption in Cambodia. The result based on Cambodia’s annual data from 1987 to 2015 shows that private consumption responds positively to a rise in disposable income or a decline in saving interest rates. Inflation is statistically insignificant. The impact of government purchases on private consumption is linear, negative, and asymmetric. A non-linear effect of government investment on household consumption occurs in Cambodia during certain periods—times of political instability, which are 1994-1995, 1997-1998, and 2004-2006. This non-Keynesian effect during the period 2010-2015 occurs because of raising the present value of taxes. The contribution of the study is that an increase in the present value of taxes and political instability can prevent the efficacy of government spending on private consumption.

References

  1. Aarle, B. Van, & Garretsen, H. (2003). Keynesian , non-Keynesian or no effects of fiscal policy changes ? The EMU case. Journal of Macroeconomics, 25, 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-0704(03)00026-0
  2. Ahmed, S. (1986). Temporary and permanent government spending in an open economy: Some evidence for the United Kingdom. Journal of Monetary Economics, 17(2), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(86)90028-0
  3. Alesina, A., & Ardagna, S. (1998). Tales of fiscal adjustment. Economic Policy, 13(27), 487–545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00039
  4. Amano, R. A., & Wirjanto, T. S. (1997). Intratemporal substitution and government spending. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397557187
  5. Amano, R. A., & Wirjanto, T. S. (1998). Government Expenditures and the Permanent-Income Model *. Review of Economic Dynamics, 1(3), 719–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1998.0021
  6. Ambler, S., Bouakez, H., & Cardia, E. (2017). Does the crowding-in effect of public spending on private consumption undermine neoclassical models? Research in Economics, 71(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2017.04.004
  7. Aschauer, D. A. (1985). Fiscal policy and aggregate demand. American Economic Review, 75(1), 117–127.
  8. Bailey, M. J. (1971). National Income and the Price Level : A Study in Macroeconomic Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  9. Barro, R. J. (1981). Output effects of government purchases. Journal of Political Economy, 89(6), 1086–1121.
  10. Baxter, M., & King, R. G. (1993). Fiscal Policy in General. The American Economic Review, 83(3), 315–334.
  11. Bertola, G., & Drazen, A. (1993). Trigger points and budget cuts: Explaining the effects of fiscal austerity. American Economic Review, 89(9), 11–26.
  12. Blanchard, O. J. (1990). [Can Severe Fiscal Contractions Be Expansionary? Tales of Two Small European Countries]: Comment. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 5, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585134
  13. Boehm, C. E. (2019). Government consumption and investment: Does the composition of purchases affect the multiplier? Journal of Monetary Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.05.003
  14. Bouakez, H., & Rebei, N. (2007). Why does private consumption rise after a government spending shock? Canadian Journal of Economics, 40(3), 954–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00438.x
  15. Chang, Y., Choi, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2017). A new approach to model regime switching. Journal of Econometrics, 196(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.09.005
  16. Cour, P., Dubois, E., Mahfouz, S., & Pisani-Ferry, J. (1996). The Cost of Fiscal Retrenchment Revisited : How Strong is the Evidence ? (No. 1996–16). Paris.
  17. Dawood, T. C., & Francois, J. N. (2018). Substitution between private and government consumption in African economies. Economic Modelling, 73(May 2017), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.03.012
  18. Devereux, M. B., Head, A. C., & Lapham, B. J. (1996). Monopolistic competition , increasing returns , and the effects of government spending. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 28(2), 233–254.
  19. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348
  20. Giavazzi, F., & Pagano, M. (1990). Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? Tales of two small European countries. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 5, 75–111.
  21. Giavazzi, F., & Pagano, M. (1996). Non-Keynesian effects of fiscal policy changes: International evidence and the Swedish experience. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 3(1), 67–103.
  22. Graham, F. C. (1993). Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Demand : Comment. The American Economic Review, 83(3), 659–666.
  23. Hajamini, M., & Falahi, M. A. (2018). Economic growth and government size in developed European countries: A panel threshold approach. Economic Analysis and Policy, 58, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.12.002
  24. Hamilton, J. D. (1989). A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica, 57(2), 357–384.
  25. Ho, T. W. (2001). The government spending and private consumption: A panel cointegration analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance, 10(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-0560(00)00073-3
  26. Höppner, F., & Wesche, K. (2000). Non-linear effects of fiscal policy in Germany: A Markov-switching approach (No. 9/2000). Bonn.
  27. Jahan, S., Mahmud, A. S., & Papageorgiou, C. (2014, September). What is Keynesian economics? Finance & Development, IMF, 51(3), 53–54.
  28. Jha, S., Mallick, S. K., Park, D., & Quising, P. F. (2014). Effectiveness of countercyclical fiscal policy: Evidence from developing Asia. Journal of Macroeconomics, 40, 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.02.006
  29. Kamps, C. (2001). Fiscal consolidation in Europe: Pre- and post-Maastricht (No. 1028). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.753008
  30. Karras, G. (1994). Government Spending and Private Consumption: Some International Evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 26(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/2078031
  31. Kirchgässner, G., Wolters, J., & Hassler, U. (2013). Introduction to Modern Time Series Analysis (2nd ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  32. Kormendi, R. C. (1983). Government debt , government spending , and private sector behavior. The American Economic Review, 73(5), 994–1010. https://doi.org/10.2307/1814667
  33. Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477
  34. McDermott, J., & Wescott, R. F. (1996). An empirical analysis of fiscal adjustments. IMF Staff Papers, 43(4), 725–753.
  35. Perotti, R. (1999). Fiscal Policy in Good Times and Bad. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1399–1436. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556304
  36. Phelps, E. (1961). The golden rule of accumulation: A fable for growthmen. American Economic Review, 51(4), 638–643.
  37. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the Dimension of a Model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
  38. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
  39. Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
  40. Sulekha, A., Mary, R. F. P., & Tharmalingam. (2019). Impact of inflation of the household spending power. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(5), 8–11.
  41. Varlamova, J., & Larionova, N. (2015). Macroeconomic and Demographic Determinants of Household Expenditures in OECD Countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24(July), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00686-3
  42. Wang, L., & Gao, W. (2011). Nonlinear Effects of Fiscal Policy on Private Consumption: Evidence from China. China & World Economy, 19(2), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2011.01235.x
bottom of page