top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Engineering and Technology Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2622-9374

Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.21 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.06 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.12 PM.png
Screen Shot 2018-08-15 at 7.28.27 PM.png
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 21 December 2024

Optimizing Materials and Building Design for the Circular Economy in Bali: A Case Study of Architectural Projects

Ngakan Ketut Acwin Dwijendra, Desak Ayu Krystina Winastri K, Dewa Ngakan Made Bagus Krishna K, Ni Komang Prasiani, I Kadek Pranajaya, Ni Made Emmi Nutrisia Dewi, Freddy Hendrawan

University of Udayana (Indonesia), Institut Desain dan Bisnis Bali (Indonesia)

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.5281/zenodo.14533614

Pages: 41-48

Keywords: Circular Economy, Environmentally Friendly Materials, Modular Design, Sustainable Architecture, Bali, Waste Reduction, Resource Efficiency

Abstract

Through case studies of architectural projects, this article explores how Bali's circular economy is supported by the optimization of building materials and design. The circular economy seeks to increase resource reuse and reduce waste. This study examines architectural projects that incorporate circular economy concepts, like eco-friendly materials and adaptable modular design, using a case study methodology. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and analysis of project documents. The results show that recycled bamboo reduces carbon emissions by up to 40% and new materials by up to 50%, while recycled concrete reduces carbon emissions by 30% and new aggregates by 35%. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that flexible modular designs increase resource efficiency by 25% and decrease construction waste by up to 30%. Collaboration between governments, developers, and local communities is essential in supporting the successful implementation of circular economy principles. These findings guide architectural and engineering professionals to apply the circular economy concept, creating more sustainable and efficient buildings.

References

  1. Blengini, G. A., & Di Carlo, T. (2010). The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings. Energy and Buildings, 42(6). doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.009

  2. Djamba, Y. K., & Neuman, W. L. (2002). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Teaching Sociology, 30(3). doi: 10.2307/3211488

  3. Garusinghe, G. D. A. U., Perera, B. A. K. S., & Weerapperuma, U. S. (2023). Integrating Circular Economy Principles in Modular Construction to Enhance Sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(15). doi: 10.3390/su151511730

  4. Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4). doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.141942

  5. Jayawardana, J., Sandanayake, M., Kulatunga, A. K., Jayasinghe, J. A. S. C., Zhang, G., & Osadith, S. A. U. (2023). Evaluating the Circular Economy Potential of Modular Construction in Developing Economies—A Life Cycle Assessment. Sustainability, 15(23). doi: 10.3390/su152316336

  6. Li, J., Andersen, L. V., & Hudert, M. M. (2023). The Potential Contribution of Modular Volumetric Timber Buildings to Circular Construction: A State-of-the-Art Review Based on Literature and 60 Case Studies. Sustainability, 15(23). doi: 10.3390/su152316203

  7. MacKenbach, S., Zeller, J. C., & Osebold, R. (2020). A Roadmap towards Circularity - Modular Construction as a Tool for Circular Economy in the Built Environment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588(5). doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/588/5/052027

  8. Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3). doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2

  9. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. In Pearson Education.

  10. Pacheco-Torgal, F. (2014). Eco-efficient construction and building materials research under the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020. In Construction and Building Materials (Vol. 51). doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.058

  11. Sharma, B., Gatóo, A., Bock, M., & Ramage, M. (2015). Engineered bamboo for structural applications. Construction and Building Materials, 81. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.077

  12. Skarbek, D. (2020). Qualitative research methods for institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, 16(4). doi: 10.1017/S174413741900078X

  13. Toloie-eshlaghy, A., Chitsaz, S., Karimian, L., & Clarkhchi, R. (2011). A classification of qualitative research methods. Research Journal of International Studies, 20(20).

  14. Turner, C., Oyekan, J., & Stergioulas, L. K. (2021). Distributed manufacturing: A new digital framework for sustainable modular construction. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3). doi: 10.3390/su13031515

  15. Welch, J. K., & Patton, M. Q. (1992). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. The Modern Language Journal, 76(4). doi: 10.2307/330063

  16. Zhuang, G. L., Shih, S. G., & Wagiri, F. (2023). Circular economy and sustainable development goals: Exploring the potentials of reusable modular components in circular economy business model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137503

bottom of page