Teaching in the Aftermath of a Pandemic: Must an Employer Provide an Accommodation for Commuting for a Disabled Employee?
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 27 August 2021

Teaching in the Aftermath of a Pandemic: Must an Employer Provide an Accommodation for Commuting for a Disabled Employee?

Richard J. Hunter, Jr., Hector R. Lozada, John H. Shannon

Seton Hall University

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.338

Pages: 271-289

Keywords: Americans with Disability Act, Accommodation, Undue Burden, Commuting, Essential Function, Online and Hybrid Teaching

Abstract

Part I of the paper discusses the Americans with Disabilities Act or ADA, its requirements, and various protections for persons who suffer from a recognized disability which impacts their ability to work under certain circumstances and conditions. The context of this study is American higher education. Part II will discuss the obligation of an employer to offer a “reasonable accommodation” of the nature sought by an employee which would permit the employee to continue teaching while otherwise meeting all of the obligations imposed on faculty members under appropriate university policies. Specifically, the research question considered in Part II relates to whether “commuting” is a covered activity under the ADA which would trigger the responsibility of providing the employee with a reasonable accommodation, allowing an employee to teach in the employee’s preferred combination of online and hybrid modalities.

References

Aldousari, A., Alghamdi, A., & Alwadei, H. (2021). The 1991 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards for accessible design. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(1): 59-62.

Aoun, E.G. & Appelbaum, P.S. (2019). Ten years after the ADA Amendment Act (2008): the relationship between ADA employment discrimination and substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services, 79(7): 596-603.

Barancik, A. (1989). Determining reasonable accommodations under the ADA: why courts should require employers to participate in an interactive process. Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal, 30(3): 513-549.

Barry, K. (2010). 2008 can and can’t do for disability rights. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 31: 203-283.

Batiste, L.C. (2021). Accommodations related to commuting to and from work. Job Accommodation Network: Consultants Corner, 8(1). Available: https://askjan.org/publications/consultants-corner/vol08iss01.cfm

Brooks, W. (2019). The application of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act to employment discrimination: why the circuits have gotten it wrong. Touro Law Review, 35(1): 73-100.

Burgdorf, R.L. (1991). Equal access to public accommodations. The Milbank Quarterly, 69(1/2): 183-213.

Chamusco. B.G. (2017). Revitalizing the law that “preceded the movement.” The University of Chicago Law Review, 84(3): 1285-1324.

Colker, R. (2004). The ADA’s journey through Congress. Wake Forest Law Review, 39: 1-48.

Congressional Digest Corporation (1989). Should the Senate approve the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1989? Congressional Digest (December 1989): 208.

Cox, J. (2019). Disability law and gender identity discrimination. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 81: 315-348.

Dunn, P.L. (2018). A review and history of Supreme Court rulings related to Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Rehabilitation Professional, 26(1): 19-27.

Eichhorn, L.A. (1999). Major litigation activities regarding major life activities: the failure of the disability definition in the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. North Carolina Law Review, 77: 1405-1478.

Eichhorn, L.A. (2002). Hostile environment actions, Title VII, and the ADA: the limits of the copy-and-paste function. Washington Law Review, 77: 575-638.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1995). EEOC releases new ADA guidance defining “disability.” EEOC.gov (March 15, 1995). Available: https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-releases-new-ada-guidance-defining-disability-0 (last visited July 26, 2021).

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2008). Applying performance and conduct standards to employees with disabilities. EEOC.gov (September 3, 2008). Available: https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/applying-performance-and-conduct-standards-employees-disabilities (last visited July 26, 2021).

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2011). Regulations to implement the equal employment provisions of the Americans with Disability Act, as amended. Govinfo.gov (March 25, 2011). Available: https://www.govinfo/content/pkg/FR-2011-03-25/pdf/2011-6056.pdf (last visited July 26, 2021).

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2021). Small business and reasonable accommodations. Notice concerning the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008 (effective March 25, 2011). EEOC.gov. Available: https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/notice-concerning-americans-disabilities-act-ada-amendments-act-2008 (last accessed July 28, 2021).

Feinberg, R. (2021). Overcoming obstacles-fight for your rights. Section 4: struggles of the movement. Push Magazine. Available: https://disabilitymovement.weebly.com/section-5-overcoming-obstacles.html

Feldblum, C.R., Barry, K., & Benfer, E.A. (2008). The ADA Amendments Act of 2008. Texas Journal on Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, 13(2): 187-199.

Gissen, D. (2019). Disability and preservation. Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism, 16(1): iii-xii.

Goodall, B., Pottinger, G., Dixon, T., & Russell, H. (2005). Access to historic environments for tourists with disabilities: a compromise? Tourism Review International, 8(3): 177-194.

Griffin, F. (2020). Covid-19 and the Americans with Disabilities Act: balancing fear, safety, and risk as America goes back to work. Seton Hall Law Review, 51: 383-430.

Hilton, E. (1987). Private clubs and employment discrimination: does federal law apply? Fordham Urban Law Journal, 16(4): 615-645.

Hunter, R.J., & Brown, T.E. (2015). Transgender athlete rights under Title IX and NCAA policy: inadequacy and unevenness of treatment demands equal protection and at least intermediate scrutiny analysis. International Journal of Sport Studies, 5(7): 752-764.

Hutchison, K. (2020). Accommodations for commuting to work and driving jobs. Accessibility.com (October 16, 2020). Available: https://www.accessibility.com,/blog//accommodations-for-commuting-and-driving-jobs

Jeter, M.J. (2016). “No handicapped people allowed”: the need for objective accessibility standards under the Fair Housing Act. Washington Law Review, 91: 325-359.

Johnson, E.P. (1995). Employment discrimination and private clubs: what is a bona fide private membership club? Labor Law Journal (Chicago), 46(10): 632-635.

Kennedy, L.C. (2019). Does ADA cover accommodations for transgender workers? Law 360 (January 16, 2019). Available: https://www.eckertseamans.com/app/uploads/KennedyLaw360-011619.pdf

Lawton, K.A. (1990). Americans with Disabilities Act explained. Christianity Today (October 8, 1990), 34(14): 71.

Lederman, D. (2009). The hyflex option for instruction if campuses open this fall. Inside Higher Ed (May 13, 2029). Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2020/05/13/one-option-delivering-instruction-if-campuses-open-fall-hyflex

Levi, J.L. & Barry, K.M. (2021). Embracing the ADA: transgender people of disability rights. Harvard Law Review Blog (February 22, 2021). Available: https://blog.harvardlawreview.org/embracing-the-ada-transgender-people-and-disability-rights/

Livergood, J.L. (2001). Riding into tomorrow: Olinger v. United States Golf Association. DePaul Law Review, 51: 125-181.

Mandel, S. (1990). Disabling the GOP. The National Review (November 6, 1990), 42(11): 23–24.

Mayerson, A. (1992). The history of the Americans with Disabilities Act: a movement perspective. Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund. Available: https://dredf.org/about-us/the-history-of-the-ada/

Merley, D.J. (2019). Court refuses to order employer to accommodate commuting anxiety. The Employment Law Report (February 4, 2009). Available: https://www.felhaber.com/wp-content/plugins/kalins-pdf-creation-station/kalins_pdf_create.php?singlepost=po_12486

Miller, K.E. (2017). Mediating the interactive process. The Colorado Lawyer (May 2017): 35-38.

Millman, B. & Kabir, N. (2011). Federal appeals court holds that employers may be obligated under the ADA to accommodate commuting work. Littler Insight (October 24, 2011). Available: https://www.littler.com/federal-appeals-court-holds-employers-may-be-obligated-under-ada-accommodate-commuting-work

National Center for Transgender Equality. (2017). Breakthrough: Americans with Disability Act can’t exclude gender dysphoria. Transgender Equality.org (May 22, 2017). Available:  https://transequality.org/blog/breakthrough-americans-with-disabilities-act-can-t-exclude-gender-dysphoria

National Council on Disability. (2021). Available: ndc.gov (last accessed July 25, 2021).

National Network. (2021). How many people in the United States have a disability? ADA National Network.org. Available: https://adata.org/faq/how-many-people-united-states-have-disability(last visited July 26, 2021).

Parry, J.W. (1992). Public accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act: nondiscrimination on the basis of disability. Mental and Physical Law Reporter, 16(1): 92-100.

Parry, J.W. & Allbright, A.L. (2008). The ADA Amendments Act of 2008: analysis and commentary. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 32(5): 695-697.

Payne, J. (2021). The American church and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Religion and Society, 23: 1-6.

Perkins, B. (2018). The ADA and the fight against employment discrimination. University of Illinois Chicago John Marshall Law Review, 52(1): 51-81.

Porter, N.B. (2019). A new look at the ADA’s undue hardship defense. Missouri Law Review, 84: 121-176.

Ramey, M.A. (2007). The Americans with Disability Act: a history of rights. Journal of Philosophy and History of Education, 57: 128-135.

Rosenthal, L.D. (2005). Reasonable accommodations for individuals regarded as having disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act? Why “no” should not be the answer. Seton Hall Law Review, 36: 895-969.

Roth, J.A. (2018). Your presence is required: employee unable to travel to job site was not “qualified” within the meaning of the ADA. Disability, Leave & Health Management Blog (August 12, 2018). Available: https://www.disabilityleavelaw.com/2018/08/articles/ada/your-presence-is-required-employee-unable-to-travel-to-job-site-was-not-qualified-within-the-meaning-of-the-ada/

Rothstein, L.F. (2000). Celebrating the tenth anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Houston Law Review, 37: 978-986.

Sepper, E. (2016). The role of religion in state public accommodations laws. St. Louis Law Journal, 60: 631-670.

Shinn, J. (2016). “Reasonable accommodations” and “undue hardship” defenses—it comes down to money. Michigan Employment Law Advisor (January 25, 2016). Available: https://www.michiganemploymentlawadvisor.com/americans-with-disabilities-act-ada/reasonable-accommodations-and-undue-hardship-defenses-it-comes-down-to-money/

Social Security Administration. (2020). ADA at 30: the Americans with Disability Act and working from home. SSA.gov (June 2, 2020). Available: https://choosework.ssa.gov/blog/2020-06-02-ada-at-30-the-americans-with-disabilities-act-and-working-from-home

Stapleton, D.C. & Burkhauser, R.V. (2004). Review: Has the Americans with Disabilities Act reduced employment for people with disabilities? Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 25(2): 527-563.

Stowe, M.A. (2000). Interpreting “place of public accommodation” under Title III of the ADA: a technical determination with potentially broad civil rights implications. Duke Law Journal, 50: 297-329.

Travis, M.A. (2021). A post-pandemic antidiscrimination approach to workplace flexibility. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, 64: 203-230.

Westergard, C. (2020). Unfit to be seen: customer preferences and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law, 34: 179-215.


Statutes


ADA Amendments Act of 2008. Public Law 110-325 (2008).

Americans with Disabilities Act. Public Law 101-336 (2000).

Civil Rights Act of 1964. Public Law 88-352 (1964).

Code of Federal Regulations. 28 C.F.R., Part 36, Appendix A (2021).

Communications Act of 1934. Public Law 73-416 (1934).

Federal Housing Amendments Act [Fair Housing Act]. Public Law 90-284 (1984).

Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Public Law 93-112 (1973).

Telecommunications Act of 1996. Public Law 104-104 (1996).

Television Decoder Circuitry Act of 1990. Public Law 101-431 (1990).


Cases


Blatt v. Cabela’s Retail, Inc. (2017). 2017 U.S. District LEXIS 75665 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania).

Colwell v. Rite Aid Corp. (2010). 602 F.3d 495 (United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit).

DeRosa v. Nat’l Envelope Corp. (2010). 595 F.3d 99 (2010) (United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit).

Dunn v. Faithful & Gould, Inc. (2018). U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194026 (United States District Court for the District of South Carolina).

Humphrey v. Memorial Hospital Ass’n. (2001). 239 F.3d 1128 (United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit).

Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Office of the Courts (2015). 780 F.3d 562 (United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit).

Jacques v. Clean-Up Group, Inc. (1996). 96 F.3d 506 (United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit).

Katz v. City Metal Co. (1994). 87 F.3d 20 (United States Circuit Court for the First Circuit).

Nixon-Tinkelman v. N.Y. City Dep’t of Health & Mental Hygiene (2011). 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit).

Olinger v. United States Golf Association (2000). 205 F.3d 1001 (United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit).

Searls v. Johns Hopkins Hospital. (2016). 15 F. Supp. 427 (United States District Court for the District of Maryland).

Smith v. Ameritech (2000). 129 F.3d 857 (United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit).

Toyota Motors Mfg., Ky. v. Williams (2002). 534 U.S. 184 (United States Supreme Court).

Tyndall v. Nat’l Educ. Ctrs., Inc. (1994). 31 F.3d 209 (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit).

Trautman v. Time-Warner Cable Texas, LLC (2018). 756 Fed. Appx 421 (United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit).

U.S. Airways, Inc. v. Barnett (2002). 535 U.S. 391 (United States Supreme Court).

Vande Zande v. Wisconsin (1995). 44 F.3d 538 (United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit).

bottom of page