top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 12 April 2021

Examining the Roles and Competencies of Principals of Project Schools in Terms of Accountability

Fikriye Usul, Ibrahim Kocabas

MoNE (Turkey), Yildiz Technical University (Turkey)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.199

Pages: 81-90

Keywords: Accountability, Project Schools, Roles of School Principals

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the roles and competencies of school principals working in project schools in terms of accountability, based on the views of school principals. This is a qualitative research which is based on the phenomenology design. The working group is chosen among the most well-known project schools in Istanbul using the maximum variation sampling method. Interviews were held with 12 school principals working at the Science High School, Anatolian High School, Social Sciences High School and Anatolian Religious High Schools in the 2019-2020 academic year. The data obtained from the interviews are coded using content analysis method and different 3 themes such as supervision, the functioning of education and integrity are obtained. In this context, it is indicated that project school principals felt themselves accountable most since they have a right to determine the managers and teachers they want to work with. It came to the conclusion that school principals cooperate with their internal and external stakeholders in all matters for the development of their schools.

References

  1. Aydin, I. (2016). Supervision in teaching. (6th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Press.

  2. Basar, H. (1988). Evaluation of teachers. Education and Science. 12(70).

  3. Cirit, H. & Gunday, R. (2019). The background and project school applications of secondary educational institutions applying a specific program and project based curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences in Turkish Cultural Geography. 4(2), 144-151.

  4. Col, G. (2004). The comparison of empowerment concept with similar management concepts. Work, Power, The Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources. 6(2).

  5. Francom, J. A. (2016). Roles high school principals play in establishing a successful character education initiative. Journal of Character Education. 12(1), 17-34.

  6. Fuhrman, S. H. (1999). The new accountability. CPRE Policy Briefs.

  7. Gunduz, Y. & Goker, S. D. (2017). Accountability and transparency practices in the educational supervision process. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty. 36(1), 89-93. doi:10.7822/omuefd.327390

  8. Ilhan, S. (2005). Business ethics: a theorical approach. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences. 7(2), 258-275.

  9. Karakose, T., & Kocabas, I. (2006). The effect of teachers’ expectations on job satisfaction and motivation in private and public schools. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 2(1), 3-14.

  10. Karakose, T., Kocabas, I., & Yesilyurt, H. (2014). A quantitative study of school administrators’ work–life balance and job satisfaction in public schools. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 30, 1231-1241.

  11. Kayikci, K., Canturk, G. & Yilmaz, O. (2014). General assessment and attitude of the school principals regarding clinical supervision. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. 20(2), 217-249.

  12. Kocabas, I. & Karakose, T. (2009). Ethics in school administration. African Journal of Business Management. 3(4), 126-130.

  13. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace.

  14. Ladd, H. F. (2012). School Accountability: To What Ends and With What Effects? In Keynote address for Conference on Improving Education through Accountability and Evaluation: Lessons from Around the World, Rome, Italy. Retrieved from https://fds.duke.edu/db/attachment/2050

  15. Minister of National Education of Turkish Republic [MoNE] (2018). 2023 Vision of education.
    Retrived from http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf

  16. Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.

  17. Summak, M. S. & Karadag, N. (2009). The roles of principals be assigned in school based management processes. Adiyaman University Journal of Social Sciences. 3(3), 130-140.

  18. Yolcu, H. (2007). Evaluating the finance of primary education in Turkey. (Unpublished doctoral dissertion) Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

bottom of page