top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 14 September 2023

Enhancing Student Engagement in Legal and Criminological Modules: An Andragogical Approach in Higher Education

Nephat Shumba, Sayed Reza Hussaini

University of Hertfordshire, UK

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.06.03.773

Pages: 181-201

Keywords: Andragogical, Criminological, Legal, Self-directing, Problem-Solving, Self-reflection, Student Engagement

Abstract

This research examines the application of andragogical learning and teaching methods in legal and criminologi-cal modules in higher education to enhance students’ engagement. The study is an online survey that includes both students and lecturers at Hertfordshire Law School (HLS). The research identifies strengths and areas for improvement from both staff and students’ insights. Some of the strengths include peer learning and group work, collaboration, problem-solving and critical thinking within HLS modules. In the same vein, areas for improvement include emphasis on individual problem-solving, learners’ experience, self-directing scholarship, and guidance of students on research skills. Recommendations offered include balancing individual and group activities, incorporating visual aids, and aligning assessments with problem-solving skills and tactics. Foster-ing self-reflection and collaborative learning can empower students significantly. Implementing andragogical principles can enhance learning strategies and promote effective scholarship in legal and criminological studies.

References

  1. Alam, A. (2021, November). Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education. In 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA) (pp. 1-8). IEEE, DOI: 10.1109/ICCICA52458.2021.9697272.

  2. Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Ebook: Teaching for Quality Learning at University 5e. McGraw-hill education (UK), https://tinyurl.com/5yensamh.

  3. Blaschke, L. M. (2016). Strategies for implementing self-determined learning (heutagogy) within education: A comparison of three institutions (Australia, South Africa, and Israel). Unpublished master’s thesis). Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany, https://tinyurl.com/mudtstvz.

  4. Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating twenty-first-century self-determined learners. The future of ubiquitous learning: Learning designs for emerging pedagogies, 25-40,  https://tinyurl.com/26ba4knu.

  5. Bloch, F. S. (1982). Andragogical Basis of Clinical Legal Education, The. Vand. L. Rev., 35, 321, https://tinyurl.com/5d5akuy6.

  6. Bolton, F. C. (2006). Rubrics and adult learners: Andragogy and assessment. Assessment Update, 18(3), 5-6, https://doi.org/10.1002/au.183

  7. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in higher education, 38(6), 698-712, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.

  8. Bouton, M. E. (2007). Learning and behavior: A contemporary synthesis, Sinauer Associates. https://tinyurl.com/mrxxke6j.

  9. Brown, H. W. (1985). Lateral Thinking and Andragogy: Improving Problem Solving in Adulthood. Lifelong learning, 8(7), 22, https://tinyurl.com/3yn9vfy3.

  10. Brown, G. A., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (2013). Assessing student learning in higher education. Routledge.

  11. Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310, https://tinyurl.com/5fuwpcpc.

  12. Canning, N. (2010). Playing with heutagogy: Exploring strategies to empower mature learners in higher education. Journal of further and Higher Education, 34(1), 59-71, https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770903477102.

  13. Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71-82, https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903500069.

  14. Carless, D. (2015). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69, 963-976, https://tinyurl.com/2kpcwwjb.

  15. Carter, A. (2020). Developing critical thinking skills in the ESL classroom. TESL Ontario. CONTACT Magazine, 11, 43-52, https://tinyurl.com/zpz5vrzc.

  16. Chan, S. (2010). Applications of andragogy in multi-disciplined teaching and learning. Journal of adult education, 39(2), 25-35, https://tinyurl.com/33upscjz.

  17. Chin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2006). Problem‐based learning: Using ill‐structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90(1), 44-67, https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20097.

  18. Chrysidis, S., Turner, M. J., & Wood, A. G. (2020). The effects of REBT on irrational beliefs, self-determined motivation, and self-efficacy in American Football. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(19), 2215-2224, https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1776924.

  19. Cottrell, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection (Vol. 100). Bloomsbury Publishing, https://tinyurl.com/bdenm9u4.

  20. Daniel, N. B. (2021). Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning A Question of Self-Determined Practices in Post-Secondary Education (Doctoral dissertation, Mid-America Baptist Theological Seminary), https://tinyurl.com/mt536r77.

  21. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied developmental science, 24(2), 97-140, https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.

  22. Ekoto, C. E., & Gaikwad, P. (2015). The impact of andragogy on learning satisfaction of graduate students. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(11), 1378-1386,DOI:10.12691/education-3-11-6.

  23. Entwistle, N. (2017). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Bloomsbury Publishing, https://tinyurl.com/mrymrc25.

  24. Ferguson, S., Thornley, C., & Gibb, F. (2016). Beyond codes of ethics: how library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 543-556, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.012.

  25. Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (revised). New York: Continuum, 356, 357-358, https://tinyurl.com/3xsd54da.

  26. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001.

  27. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons, https://tinyurl.com/yexf3923.

  28. Gharti, L. (2019). Self-directed learning for learner autonomy: Teachers' and Students' perceptions. Journal of NELTA Gandaki, 1, 62-73, https://tinyurl.com/3h3c7n5y.

  29. Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active learning in higher education, 5(1), 87-100, https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404040463.

  30. Gitterman, A. (2004). Interactive andragogy: Principles, methods, and skills. Journal of teaching in social work, 24(3-4), 95-112, https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v24n03_07.

  31. Glassman, M., & Kang, M. J. (2016). Teaching and learning through open source educative processes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 281-290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.09.002.

  32. Grace, A. P. (1996). Striking a critical pose: andragogy‐‐missing links, missing values. International journal of lifelong education, 15(5), 382-392, https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137960150506.

  33. Jaakkola, M. (2015). Teacher heutagogy in the network society: A framework for critical reflection. Critical learning in digital networks, 163-178, https://tinyurl.com/yc7wtf46.

  34. Jonassen, D. H. (2010). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. Routledge, https://tinyurl.com/87wczu6t.

  35. Hagen, M., & Park, S. (2016). We knew it all along! Using cognitive science to explain how andragogy works. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(3), 171-190, https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2015-0081.

  36. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112, https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.

  37. Hidayat, D. (2018). Social entrepreneurship andragogy-based for community empowerment. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 42, p. 00102). EDP Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200102

  38. Hirsch, P. D., Brosius, J. P., & Gagnon, P. (2013). Navigating complex trade-offs in conservation and development: an integrative framework. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, https://tinyurl.com/bdeypdrn.

  39. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16, 235-266, https://tinyurl.com/3m3cpeb9.

  40. Huxley-Binns, R. (2016). Tripping over thresholds: a reflection on legal andragogy. The Law Teacher, 50(1), 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2016.1147310.

  41. Kasper, A., & Laurits, E. (2016). Challenges in collecting digital evidence: a legal perspective. The future of law and eTechnologies, 195-233, https://tinyurl.com/3kwvjnyt.

  42. Kenner, C., & Weinerman, J. (2011). Adult learning theory: Applications to non-traditional college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), 87-96, https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2011.10850344.

  43. Kicken, W., Brand‐Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2008). Scaffolding advice on task selection: a safe path toward self‐directed learning in on‐demand education. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 60(3), 223-239, https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820802305561.

  44. Knowles, M. S. (1980). From pedagogy to andragogy. Religious Education, https://tinyurl.com/4924savh.

  45. Krutka, D. G., Carpenter, J. P., & Trust, T. (2016). Elements of engagement: A model of teacher interactions via professional learning networks. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(4), 150-158, https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1206492

  46. Liedtka, J., King, A., & Bennett, K. (2013). Solving problems with design thinking: Ten stories of what works. Columbia University Press.

  47. Long, J. D. (2022). The intersection of andragogy and dissertation writing: How andragogy can improve the process. In Research Anthology on Doctoral Student Professional Development (pp. 88-109). IGI Global, https://tinyurl.com/4r2wwrvc.

  48. Luckin, R. (2018). Enhancing Learning and Teaching with Technology: What the Research Says. UCL IOE Press. UCL Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL.

  49. Maharg, P. (2016). Transforming legal education: learning and teaching the law in the early twenty-first century. Routledge.

  50. Maze Jr, R. G. (2020). Understanding Non-traditional Online Doctoral Socialization Experiences and the Decision to Persist in the Dissertation Phase (Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University), https://tinyurl.com/thuk6kxn.

  51. McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 10(2), 209-220, https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121289.

  52. McCallum, S., & Milner, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of formative assessment: student views and staff reflections. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761.

  53. McNaught, K., & Benson, S. (2015). Increasing student performance by changing the assessment practices within an academic writing unit in an Enabling Program. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 6(1), https://fyhejournal.com/article/viewFile/249/266.

  54. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New directions for adult and continuing education, 2001(89), 3, https://tinyurl.com/52av7jzj.

  55. Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2013). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons.

  56. Michael, J. (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works?. Advances in physiology education, https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006.

  57. Miflin, B. (2004). Adult learning, self‐directed learning and problem‐based learning: deconstructing the connections. Teaching in higher education, 9(1), 43-53, https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000155821.

  58. Mitchell, T. M., Utgoff, P. E., & Banerji, R. (1983). Learning by experimentation: Acquiring and refining problem-solving heuristics. Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach, 163-190, https://tinyurl.com/yj2n8hdj.

  59. Moore, K. (2010). The three-part harmony of adult learning, critical thinking, and decision-making. Journal of Adult Education, 39(1), 1-10, https://tinyurl.com/4445uce8.

  60. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. John Wiley & Sons.

  61. Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British journal of educational psychology, 46(2), 128-148, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02305.x.

  62. Persada, A. G., & Lutfi, H. (2020, October). Attract Students Attention using Gamification. In 2020 6th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED) (pp. 1-6). IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED51276.2020.9415860.

  63. Pew, S. (2007). Andragogy and pedagogy as foundational theory for student motivation in higher education. InSight: a collection of faculty scholarship, 2, 14-25, https://tinyurl.com/mt3rkh62.

  64. Reno, J. (1999). Lawyers as Problem-Solvers: Keynote Address to the AALS. Journal of Legal Education, 49(1), 5-13, https://www.jstor.org/stable/42893578.

  65. Salmon, G. (2012). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. Routledge.

  66. Samson, P. L. (2015). Fostering student engagement: Creative problem-solving in small group facilitations. Collected essays on learning and teaching, 8, 153-164, https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v8i0.4227.

  67. Schneider, J. (2021). What's on the Docket?: Applying Universal Design to Support Student Success in Law-Related Coursework. In Handbook of Research on Applying Universal Design for Learning Across Disciplines: Concepts, Case Studies, and Practical Implementation (pp. 279-299). IGI Global.

  68. Takano, K., & Tanno, Y. (2009). Self-rumination, self-reflection, and depression: Self-rumination counteracts the adaptive effect of self-reflection. Behaviour research and therapy, 47(3), 260-264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.12.008.

  69. Taylor, B., & Kroth, M. (2009). Andragogy's transition into the future: Meta-analysis of andragogy and its search for a measurable instrument. Journal of adult education, 38(1), 1-11, https://tinyurl.com/4dkyxwj8.

  70. Taylor, P. (2017). Learning about professional growth through listening to teachers. Professional development in education, 43(1), 87-105, https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1030035.

  71. Tomczyk, Ł., Vanek, B., Pavlov, I., Karikova, S., Biresova, B., & Kryston, M. (2018). Critical thinking, problem-solving strategies and individual development assessment among NEETs–research conducted in Slovakia, Poland and Estonia. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37(6), 701-718, https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2018.1550446.

  72. Trigwell, K., & Shale, S. (2004). Student learning and the scholarship of university teaching. Studies in higher education, 29(4), 523-536, https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236407.

  73. Voyles, E. C., Bailey, S. F., & Durik, A. M. (2015). New pieces of the jigsaw classroom: increasing accountability to reduce social loafing in student group projects. The new school psychology bulletin, 13(1), 11-20, https://tinyurl.com/3jv35wjf.

  74. Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354-369, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008.

  75. Wilson, L. H. (2009). Practical teaching: A guide to PTLLS & DTLLS. Cengage Learning.

  76. Wozniak, K. (2020). Personalized learning for adults: An emerging andragogy. Emerging technologies and pedagogies in the curriculum, 185-198, https://tinyurl.com/t8z5dejw.

  77. Yorke, M., & Knight, P. T. (2006). Embedding employability into the curriculum (Vol. 3). York: Higher Education Academy, http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/185821.

  78. Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 749-768). Academic Press.

  79. Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active learning in higher education, 11(3), 167-177, https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680.

  80. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.

bottom of page