Enhancing Oral English Communication Ability of Thai EFL Undergraduates via Interactive Reading Comprehension Teaching (IRCT)
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 04 March 2021

Enhancing Oral English Communication Ability of Thai EFL Undergraduates via Interactive Reading Comprehension Teaching (IRCT)

Yaruingam Phungshok Shimray, Usa Intharaksa, Patson Jaihow, Kemtong Sinwongsuwat

Prince of Songkla University, Thailand

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.01.179

Pages: 122-129

Keywords: Interactive Reading Comprehension Teaching Methods, Oral English Communication, Self-Study Reading Assignment, Small-Group Peer Teaching Project

Abstract

This paper reports on the effectiveness of Interactive Reading Comprehension Teaching (IRCT) in improving the oral English communication ability of Prince of Songkla University (PSU) undergraduates. It is based on a pre- and post-test quasi-experimental study employing IRCT, composed of self–study reading assignments and a structured peer-teaching project. The participants who were purposively sampled to partake in the study included 105 second- and third-year undergraduates from various faculties who were enrolled in a functional reading course, of which 46 was assigned to the control group and 49 was treated as the experimental group. One-on-one and group oral assessments were administered to both groups at the end of the course after IRCT implementation. The results showed IRCT had a very positive effect on the oral communication skills of the students in the experimental group, significantly improving their confidence and motivation toward speaking English. The students’ opinions from a questionnaire also revealed high speaking improvement, reinforced by evidence from close observations, interviews, and student work samples. IRCT was, therefore recommended as a reading-based approach to improving students’ oral English communication.

References

  1. Akbar, F. (2014). The role of reading in improving speaking skill in the context of teaching English as a foreign language. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 2(4), 92-98.

  2. Aksaranukroh, S. (1989). Teaching language skills and culture. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

  3. Arias, I. (2007). Selecting Reading Materials Wisely. LETRAS, 1(41), 131-151.

  4. Awais, S., & Ameen, P. (2013). The reading preferences of primary school children in Lahore. Pakistan Journal of Information Management, 14, 38–43.

  5. Bright, J. A., & McGregor, G. P. (1978). Teaching English as a second language. London: Longman.

  6. Boonpattanaporn, P. (2017). Grammar and communicative English language teaching in the Thai educational context. University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 37(2), 152-169. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/utccjournalhs/article/view/165589

  7. Chang, Y., Taylor, J., Rastle, K., & Monaghan, P. (2020). The relationships between oral language and reading instruction: Evidence from a computational model of reading. Cognitive Psychology, 1-20. Retrieved from

  8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028520300657

  9. Choomthong, D. (2014) Preparing Thai students’ English for the ASEAN economic community: Some pedagogical implications and trends. Language Education and Acquisition Research Network (LEARN) Journal, 7(1), 45-57.

  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum  Associates, Publishers.

  11. Davies, P., & Pearse, E. (2002). Success in English teaching. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

  12. Douglas, D., & Myers, R. (2000). Assessing the communication skills of veterinary students: Whose criteria? In

  13. Fairness and validation in language assessment: Selected papers from the 19th Language Testing Research Colloquium, Orlando, Florida (pp. 60-81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  14. EF EPI. (2017). English proficiency index. Retrieved from https://www.ef.co.th/epi/regions/asia/thailand

  15. EF Education First. (2019). The world's largest ranking of countries and regions by English skills Retrieved from https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/

  16. Foto, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25(4), 605-628.

  17. Folse, K. S. (2004). Myths about teaching and learning second language vocabulary: What recent research says. TESL Reporter, 37(2), 1-13.

  18. Garcia, G. E. (2000). Bilingual children’s reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Volume 3) (pp. 813- 834). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

  19. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education.

  20. Hedge, T. (1985). Using readers in language teaching. London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

  21. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in a Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  22. Hill, W. R. (1979). Secondary school reading: Process, program, procedure. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

  23. Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., Hsu, J. L., Huang, Y. M., Hsu, G. L., & Lin, Y. C. (2016). Effects of storytelling to facilitate EFL speaking using web-based multimedia system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 215-241.

  24. Krashen, S. D, & Terrel, T. D. (2005). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Prentice Hall Macmillan: New York.

  25. Laufer, B. (1997). What is in a world that makes it hard to easy: Some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. In N. Schmitt & M. Maccarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  26. Mart, C.T. (2012). Developing speaking skills through reading. International Journal of EnglishLinguistics, 2(6), 91-96.

  27. McCarthy, M. (1990). Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  28. Murcia, M. C., Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A.  (4thed.). (2013). Teaching English as second or foreign language.

  29. New York Boston: Harper Collins Cengage Learning.

  30. Oya, T., Manalo, E., & Greenwood, J. (2009). The influence of language contact and vocabulary knowledge on the speaking performance of Japanese students of English. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 2, 11-21.

  31. Prapphal, K. (2003). English proficiency of Thai learners and directions of English teaching and learning in Thailand. Journal of English Language Studies, 1(1), 6-12.

  32. Punthumasen, P. (2007). International program for teacher education: An approach to tackling problems of English education in Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.worldreform.com/pub/paperies 13dec07.pdf

  33. Remache, A. (2016). Developing students’ communicative competence in university English language programs. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308898013_DEVELOPING_STUDENTS'_COMMUNICATIVE_COMPETENCE_IN_UNIVERSITY_ENGLISH_LANGUAGE_PROGRAMS

  34. Saezhong. K. (2005). The effects of participating in oral presentations on the. English speaking abilities of fourth-year English majors (Master's thesis). Retrieved from http://thesis.swu.ac.th/swuthesis/Tea_Eng_For_Lan(M.A.)/Komet_S.pdf

  35. Shakibaei, G., & Keivan, S. (2014). The correlational analysis between speaking and listening, reading and writing, and reading and speaking mean band IELTS scores achieved by 2011 from the top 41 countries (Academic). The Iranian EFL Journal, 10(1), 338-348.

  36. Wongrak, C. (2017). The role of L1 in the instruction of L2: Perspectives of Thai EFL teachers. Paper presented at The Asian Conference on Education & International Development: Educating for Change, Nagoya, Japan.

  37. Zhang, Y. (2009). Reading to speak: Integrating oral communication skills. English Teaching Forum, 1, 32-34.

bottom of page