Determination of Psychological Counsellor Candidates’ Competency Levels and Educational Needs in terms of Therapeutic Conditions in the Process of Individual Counselling
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 27 September 2021

Determination of Psychological Counsellor Candidates’ Competency Levels and Educational Needs in terms of Therapeutic Conditions in the Process of Individual Counselling

Hafız Bek, Hakan Gülveren

Usak University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.364

Pages: 606-616

Keywords: Psychological Counsellor, Educational Needs, Therapeutic Conditions

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to enhance the quality of psychological counselling education by identifying needs and competencies in the field. The lack of specific studies on therapeutic conditions in psychological counseling education on a national scale has led us to conduct the current study. The study group consists of 20 students (12 female, 8 male) taking Individual Counselling course during spring term in 2019- 2020 academic year. According to the audio recordings, the participants were seen to be unable to behave at expected level under the title of concreteness of therapeutic conditions. In addition, they were observed not to provide necessary conditions under the title of transparency. However, it has been revealed that they managed to develop empathy. Moreover, they were seen to be unable to fulfill here and now principle at expected level. Finally, they were found to perform respect conditions.

References

  1. Aladağ, M. (2004, Haziran 4-5). Süpervizyon teknikleri dersinin uzmanlara kazandırdıkları [The supervision techniques course brings to the experts] [Sözlü bildiri]. IX. YÖKREP Sempozyumu, YÖRET, PDR Hizmetlerinde Gözetim (Süpervizyon), Başkent Üniversitesi, Ankara, Ankara, Turkey.

  2. Aladağ, M., & Kemer, G. (2017). Psikolojik danışman eğitiminde bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulamasının ve süpervizyonunun incelenmesi [Investigation of individual counseling practicum and supervision in counselor education] . Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi Sonuç Raporu. Proje No: 12 EGF 003.

  3. Atik, G. (2012). Lisans Düzeyindeki Psikolojik Danışman Eğitiminde Süpervizyon Süreci: Ankara Üniversitesi Örneği [[Supervision process in the education of undergraduate students of counseling: A case of Ankara University]. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Bülteni, 3(23).

  4. Barbazette, J. (2006). Training needs assassment methods, tools and techniques. Pfeiffer.

  5. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3th ed.). Pearson.

  6. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: Introduction and methods. Allyn and Bacon.

  7. Büyükgöze-Kavas, A. (2011). Bireysel ve grupla psikolojik danışma uygulamalarına yönelik bir değerlendirme [An evaluation of individual and group counseling practices]. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(2), 411-432.

  8. Campbell, J. M. (2000). Becoming an effective supervisor: A workbook for counselor and psychotherapist. Routledge.

  9. Corey, G. (1991). Theory and the practice of counseling and psychotherapy (4th ed.). Brooks/Cole.

  10. DiMino, J. L., & Risler, R. (2012). Group supervision of supervision: A relational approach for training supervisors. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 26(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2012.633050

  11. Dye, H. A., & Borders, L. D. (1990). Counseling supervisors: Standards for preparation and practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69(1), 27-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb01449.x

  12. Ercan, L. (2001). Ergenlik döneminde rehberlik ve psikolojik danişma hizmetleri [Guidance and psychological counseling services during adolescence]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 9(2), 47-58.

  13. Eryılmaz A., & Bek, H. (2019). Danışanların beklentilerine göre etkili psikolojik danişmanlarin 15 özelliği [The 15 qualities of effective counselors to expectations of clients]. Kalem Eğitim ve İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 273-294. https://doi.org/10.23863 / kalem.2018.106

  14. Eryılmaz, A. & Mutlu-Süral, T. (2014). Kuramdan uygulamaya bireyle psikolojik danışma [Individual counseling from theory to practice]. Anı.

  15. Eryılmaz, A. (2013). Using of positive psychology on psychological counseling and guidance context on character strength and preventive services. The Journal of Happiness and Well-Being, 1 (1), 1-22.

  16. Gerard, E. (1997). Psikolojik danışmaya giriş: Kişilerarası ilişkiler kurmada ve kişisel yardım hizmetini vermede sistematik bir model [The skilled helper : a model for systematic helping and interpersonal relating]. (Çev. F. Akkoyun). Form Ofset.

  17. Gupta, K., Sleezer, C.M., & Russ-Eft, D.F. (2007). A practical guide to needs assessment (2nd ed). Pfeiffer.

  18. Ivey, A. E. (1988). Intentional interviewing and counseling (2nd edition). Pacific Grove.

  19. McGoldrick, B. & Tobey, D.D. (2016). Needs assessment basics(2nd ed). ATD Press.

  20. Meydan, B. (2014). Psikolojik danışma uygulamalarına yönelik bir süpervizyon modeli: Mikro beceri süpervizyon modeli [A supervision model for counseling practicum: microcounseling supervision model]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 15(2), 358-374.

  21. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and Interaction. Sage.

  22. Siviş-Çetinkaya, R. & Karaırmak, Ö. (2012). Psikolojik danışman eğitiminde süpervizyon [Supervision in counselor education]. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4 (37), 107-121.

  23. Sönmez, V., Alacapınar, F. G., Zeybek, G., & Yıldızlı, H. (2019). Eğitimde örnekleriyle gereksinim analizi [Needs analysis with examples in education]. Anı.

  24. Taylor, P.J., O’Driscoll, M.P., & Binning, J.F. (2006). A new integrated framework for training needs analysis. Human Resource Management Journal, 8(2):29 – 50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.1998.tb00165.x

  25. Voltan-Acar, N. (2008). Yeniden terapötik iletişim: Kişiler arası ilişkiler [Re-Therapeutic communication - interpersonal relations] (5. Baskı). Nobel.

  26. Walcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis and interpretation. Sage.

bottom of page