top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 08 July 2022

CIPP Evaluation Model for Vocational Education: A Critical Review

Gede Ratnaya, Retno Indriaswuri, Desak Gede Chandra Widayanthi, I Made Purwa Dana Atmaja, A.A. Gede Putra K.P. Dalem

Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Indonesia), Politeknik Pariwisata Bali (Indonesia)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.03.519

Pages: 1-8

Keywords: CIPP, Evaluation, Vocational Education

Abstract

The CIPP model has been widely used in the evaluation of vocational education. However, there has been no research that examines the suitability of CIPP in evaluating vocational education. Therefore, this study examined the suitability of CIPP in evaluating vocational education through a literature review. This research was a literature review using the narrative review method. Based on the results and discussion, it was concluded that the CIPP model could provide a real picture of the conditions that occur in programs implemented in vocational education and could be the basis for providing recommendations for solutions given to the constraints found in the four dimensions contained in the models. However, weaknesses were found in the evaluators who had not been able to provide in-depth analysis of the problems that needed to be improved and given solutions so that the evaluation stage was still on the surface of the program being implemented. As a recommendation, it was suggested that the implementation of evaluation activities could not only be emphasized on the model used but also on who was doing the evaluation (evaluator) and the accuracy of the program with the subject that was used as a source of information in determining the success of a program.

References

  1. ________, Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards. Thousand Oaks: CA: Press.

  2. Aferi and Waskito. EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE PROGRAM (PRAKERIN) IN CLASS XI DEPARTMENT OF FISHING SHIP ENGINEERING AT SMK NEGERI 10 PADANG. https://jurnal.ranahresearch.com/index.php/R2J/article/view/128

  3. Ardiani and Ridwan. (2020). EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF INDUSTRIAL WORK PRACTICE PROGRAM (PRAKERIN). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIPP/article/view/25300.

  4. Ardiani, L. (2020). Evaluation of the Implementation of the Industrial Job Training Program (Prakerin). Scientific Journal of Education and Learning, 4(2), 194-200.

  5. Areli, A.J., Lian, B., & Kristiawan, M. (2020). Evaluation of Implementation Industrial Work Practice Programs in Vocational School. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad-Kristiawan/publication/342870679_An_Evaluation_of_Implementation_Industrial_Work_Practice_Programs_in_Vocational_School/links/5f09e99745851550509c8f-program-work-ofdus

  6. Billet, S. (2011). Vocational Education Purposes, Traditions, and Prospects. London: Springer Science+Business Media

  7. Budiyanto, B., and Suyanto, W. (2020). the evaluation of competency certification program through the LSP P-1 at vocational high school. Journal of Vocational Education, 10(1), 44-55.

  8. Clarke, L. and Winch, C. (2008). Vocational Education: International Approaches, Developments, and Systems. London & New York: Routledge.

  9. Demiris, G., Oliver, D.P., and Washington, K.T. (2019). Defining and Analyzing The Problem in Behavioral Intervention Research in Hospice and Palliative Care. London: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-814449-7.00003-X.

  10. Fitzpatrick, J.L. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

  11. Hadley, R.G., and Mitchell, L.K. (1995). Counseling Research and Program Evaluation. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

  12. Irwanti, Y.D., and Sudira, P. (2014). Evaluation of Student Competency Test for Multimedia Skills in Vocational High Schools Throughout The City of Yogyakarta. Journal of Vocational Education, 4(3).

  13. Lynch, B.K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and Practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen GmbH.

  14. Lynch, R.L. and Harnish, D. (1998). Preparing pre-service teachers’ education students housework-based strategies to improve instruction. In Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing teachers to enhance student success in the workplace and beyond (pp. 127-158). Columbus: OH : ERIC Dearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education

  15. Mardiana, C.F. (2017). 63% of Indonesians Work Not According to Major. detikFinance. https://finance.detik.com/berita Ekonomi-bisnis/d-3620313/63-orang-indonesia-berkerja-tak-dalam-jurusan

  16. Mardiyah, S.U.K., & Supriyadi, E. (2013). Evaluation of industrial work practices for the competence of marketing skills at SMKN 1 Pengasih, Kulon Progo. Journal of vocational education, 3(3).

  17. Pratiwi, M., Ridwan, R., and Waskito, W. (2019). Evaluation of the CIPP Teaching Factory Model. Scientific Journal of Education and Learning, 3(3), 414-421.

  18. Qolik, A., and Marsono, M. (2021). Evaluation of CIPP Teaching Factory for Student Development and Quality Assurance. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Learning, 4(2), 91-96.

  19. REF. (2022). Airlangga Calls Vocational Program a Solution to the Need for Skilled Manpower [Web page]. Accessed from https://www.beritasatu.com/economy/905237/airlangga-sebut-program-vocation-solution-needs-labor-terampil

  20. Sa'adah, H. D., Huriah, T., & Afandi, M. (2017). EVALUASI MATA KULIAH KEPERAWATAN MEDIKAL BEDAH MENGGUNAKAN APLIKASI MODEL CIPP (Context Input Process And Product) DI POLTEKKES RS dr. SOEPRAOEN MALANG [EVALUATION OF MEDICAL SURGICAL NURSING COURSES USING CIPP MODEL APPLICATION (Context Input Process And Product) AT POLTEKKES RS dr. SOEPRAOEN MALANG]. The Shine Cahaya Dunia Ners, 2(2).

  21. Salam, R., & Soenarto, S. (2013). Evaluation of the implementation of the remote class SMK program at MAN Karanganyar. Journal of Vocational Education, 3(2).

  22. Samidjo, S. (2017). The Effectiveness of Implementing Industrial Internships for Students of the Mechanical Engineering Education Study Program. Journal of Vocational Gardens, 5(2), 246-254.

  23. Scriven, M. (1991). Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 12(1), 55-62.

  24. Stake, R.E. (1983). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 287-310). Springer, Dordrecht.

  25. Stufflebeam, D.L., Coryn, and Chris L.S. (2014). Evaluation: Theory, Models, & Application (Second Edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  26. Stufflebeam, D.L., Madaus, G.F., Scriven, M.S. (1983). Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Service Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

  27. Stufflebeam, D.L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models (pp. 279-317). Springer, Dordrecht.

  28. Sunnah, A., & Sukoco, S. (2014). Evaluation of the implementation of the Seamolec program at the Yogyakarta Special Vocational School. Journal of Vocational Education, 4(2).

  29. Supriyantoko, I., Jaya, A., Kurnia, V., & Habiba, P.G.S. (2020). Evaluation of the implementation of the teaching factory policy with the CIPP evaluation model at the DKI Jakarta State Vocational School. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education (JVTE), 2(2), 1-10.

  30. Surawan, S., & Andriani, I. (2022, March). EVALUASI MODEL CIPP PROGRAM PEMBINAAN PAI DI MCI PALANGKA RAYA [EVALUATION OF THE CIPP MODEL OF PAI DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AT MCI PALANGKA RAYA]. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan 2022.

  31. Suwarno, S.M., & Ismanto, B. (2020). Evaluation of Automotive Technician Competency Test Sites in Quality Improvement of Vocational High School Graduates. Manage: Journal of Educational Management, 7(1), 98-109.

  32. Tyler, R.W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago press.

  33. United Nations Development Programme. Evaluation Office. (2002). Handbook on monitoring and evaluating for results. Evaluation Office.

  34. Widoyoko, E..P (2014). Evaluation of Learning Programs. Yogyakarta: Student Library.

  35. Winarni, L., Judistianti, T., Husin, F., Sutedja, E., Herawati, D., & Idrajinata, P. (2014). Penggunaan Model CIPP dalam Evaluasi Kurikulum Inti Pendidikan D-III Kebidanan [The Use of the CIPP Model in the Evaluation of the Core Curriculum of Midwifery Education D-III]. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pelayanan Kebidanan Indonesia, 1(1), 8-15.

  36. Wisanti, Tifa. (2016). EVALUATION OF PRACTICE IMPLEMENTATION WITH MODELCONTEXT, INPUT, PROCESS, AND PRODUCT (CIPP) ON MARKETING EXPERTISE COMPETENCY AT ISLAMIC VOCATIONAL SCHOOL OF BUSTANUL ULUM PAKUSARI JEMBER. UNEJ thesis.http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/77799

bottom of page