top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 17 August 2024

A Resonant Learning (RL) Framework

Charles White, Lawrence Wilde

University of Erfurt, University of Siegen

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.07.03.597

Pages: 76-96

Keywords: Education, Resonant Learning, Creativity, Teacher Training, Laptop Orchestra, ICT, CIE

Abstract

This paper introduces the Resonant Learning (RL) framework, building on Hartmut Rosa's sociological theory of resonance and Graham Wallas' theory of the creative process. The RL framework aims to contribute to teacher education by delineating resonant learning spaces in an increasingly digitally-mediated post-digital educational landscape. This paper suggests that the RL framework has potential to enhance teaching and learning by integrating principles of resonance, second-order resonance and creativity. The research aligns with the growing need to focus on Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (CIE) and Maker Education (ME) with the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in education. The laptop orchestra (LO) is discussed as a model resonant learning space that facilitates CIE & ME. This study highlights the significance of RL in supporting pre-service teacher training by fostering ICT efficacy, agency, creativity, and digital competencies essential for future-oriented pedagogy.

References

  1. Amabile, T. (2011). Componential Theory of Creativity (pp. 538–559). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

  2. Barneva, R. P., Kanev, K., Shapiro, S. B., & Walters, L. M. (2021). Enhancing music industry curriculum with digital technologies: A case study. Education Sciences, 11(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020052.

  3. Bernhard, H. C. (2016). Investigating burnout among elementary and secondary school music educators: A replication. Contributions to Music Education, 41, 145–156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24711133.

  4. Bischoff, J., Gold, R., & Horton, J. (1978). Music for an interactive network of microcomputers. Computer Music Journal, 2(3), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/3679453.

  5. Bishop, L. (2018). Collaborative musical creativity: How ensembles coordinate spontaneity. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01285.

  6. Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind Myths and Mechanisms. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Creative-Mind-Myths-and-Mechanisms/Boden/p/book/9780415314534.

  7. Booth, S. (2023). Teacher wellbeing hits five-year low, survey finds. https://schoolsweek.co.uk/working-in-schools-unsustainably-demanding-as-teacher-wellbeing-hits-five-year-low/.

  8. Carvalho, L., & Freeman, C. G. (2023). Materials and places for learning: Experiences of doctoral students in and around university spaces. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(3), 730–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00328-x.

  9. Carvalho, L., Goodyear, P., & de Laat, M. (Eds.). (2017). Place-based spaces for networked learning. New York: Routledge.

  10. Carvalho, L., & Lamb, J. (2023). Postdigital learning spaces. In P. Jandrić (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Postdigital Science and Education (pp. 1–5). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_13-1.

  11. Chen, I.-S. (2017). Computer self-efficacy, learning performance, and the mediating role of learning engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.059.

  12. Crawford, R. (2017). Rethinking teaching and learning pedagogy for education in the twenty-first century: Blended learning in music education. Music Education Research, 19(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2016.1202223.

  13. De Bruin, L., & Merrick, B. (2022). Creative pedagogies with technology: Future proofing teaching training in music. In D. Henriksen & P. Mishra (Eds.), Creative Provocations: Speculations on the Future of Creativity, Technology & Learning (Vol. 7, pp. 143–157). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14549-0_10.

  14. Ding, O. (2023). D as diagramming: The path of creative life. CALL4. https://medium.com/call4/d-as-diagramming-the-path-of-creative-life-8bec548f5ef0

  15. Edmund, D., Reed-Fuglestad, D., & Neddermeyer, J. (2022, August 31). Music teacher burnout and work-life balance: Perspectives from Minnesota – minnesota music educators association. https://mmea.org/music-teacher-burnout-and-work-life-balance-perspectives-from-minnesota/.

  16. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki-Gitai, R.-L. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press.

  17. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.1078255.

  18. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.

  19. Fanni, F., Rega, I. & Cantoni, L. (2013). Using Self-Efficacy to measure primary school teachers' perception of ICT: results from two studies. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 9(1), 100-111. Open Campus, The University of the West Indies, West Indies. Retrieved June 7, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/111898/.

  20. Fawns, T. (2019). Postdigital education in design and practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0021-8.

  21. Ghory, S., & Ghafory, H. (2021). The impact of modern technology in the teaching and learning process. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 4(3), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v4i3.73.

  22. Griffith University, & Eyles, A. M. (2018). Teachers' perspectives about implementing ICT in music education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n5.8

  23. Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x.

  24. Guilford, J.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.

  25. Haning, M. (2024). Introduction: The Need for Disruption. Routledge & CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/Points-of-Disruption-in-the-Music-Education-Curriculum-Volume-1-Systemic-Changes/Haning-Stevens-Weidner/p/book/9781032515472.

  26. Hatlevik, I. K. R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers' ict self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ict in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935.

  27. Hee-Jeong Seo, H.-J. S., & Lee, J.-Y. (2018). Analysis of future education trends using semantic network analysis. Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 24(4), 649–678. https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.24.4.649.

  28. Howard, M. C., Follmer, K. B., Smith, M. B., Tucker, R. P., & Van Zandt, E. C. (2022). Work and suicide: An interdisciplinary systematic literature review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(2), 260–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2519.

  29. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y.

  30. Inc., G. (2022). K-12 workers have highest burnout rate in u. S. Gallup.Com. https://news.gallup.com/poll/393500/workers-highest-burnout-rate.aspx.

  31. Inspections deemed 'not fit for purpose' by teachers and education staff as they battle loneliness, stress and burnout. (n.d.). Retrieved 12 May 2024, from https://www.educationsupport.org.uk/news-and-events/news/inspections-deemed-not-fit-for-purpose-by-teachers-and-education-staff-as-they-battle-loneliness-stress-and-burnout/

  32. Jopling, M. (2023). The postdigital school. In P. Jandrić (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Postdigital Science and Education (pp. 1–6). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35469-4_24-2.

  33. Kåhre, J. (2002). The mathematical theory of information. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4615-0975-2.

  34. Kang, E. S., & Yoon, H. J. (2017a). Theoretical background of the maker education. In I. Kang, H. J. Yoon, & J. W. Hwang (Eds.), Maker education (pp. 19–52). Naeha.

  35. Kang, I., & Yoon, H. J. (2017b). Exploring the evaluation framework of maker education. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(11), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.11.541.

  36. Kharkhurin, A. V. (2014). Creativity. 4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929424.

  37. Kim, J.-Y., Seo, J. S., & Kim, K. (2022). Development of novel-engineering-based maker education instructional model. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 7327–7371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10841-4.

  38. King, A., Himonides, E., & Ruthmann, S. A. (2017). The Routledge companion to music, technology, and education. Routledge.

  39. Knoblauch, H. (2014). Projection, imagination, and novelty: Towards a theory of creative action based on schutz. In M. Barber & J. Dreher (Eds.), The Interrelation of Phenomenology, Social Sciences and the Arts (Vol. 69, pp. 31–49). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01390-9_4.

  40. Lamb, J., Carvalho, L., Gallagher, M., & Knox, J. (2022). The postdigital learning spaces of higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00279-9.

  41. Leong, S. (2017). Professional development for music teachers. In A. King, E. Himonides & S. A. Ruthmann (Eds.), The Routledge companion to music, technology, and education (pp. 355–370). Routledge.

  42. Lind, J., Pelger, S., & Jakobsson, A. (2022). Students' knowledge of emerging technology and sustainability through a design activity in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09604-y.

  43. Marken, S., & Agrawal, S. (2022). K-12 workers have highest burnout rate in u. S. Gallup.Com. https://news.gallup.com/poll/393500/workers-highest-burnout-rate.aspx

  44. Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1099.

  45. Matthews, W., & Koner, K. (2017). A survey of elementary and secondary music educators' professional background, teaching responsibilities and job satisfaction in the united states. Research & Issues in Music Education, 13(1). https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/rime/vol13/iss1/2.

  46. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (1st ed., pp. 449–460). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.024.

  47. Merrick, B. (2017). Popular music and technology in the secondary school. In A. King, E. Himonides & S. A. Ruthmann (Eds.), The Routledge companion to music, technology, and education (pp. 171–180). Routledge.

  48. Merrick, B., & Joseph, D. (2023). ICT and music technology during COVID-19: Australian music educator perspectives. Research Studies in Music Education, 45(1), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1321103X221092927

  49. Onwuegbuzie, A., & Collins, K. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 281–316. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638

  50. Ouyang, M. (2023). Employing mobile learning in music education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5241–5257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11353-5.

  51. Partti, H. (2017). Building a broad view of technology in music teacher education. In R. Mantie & A. Ruthman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of technology and music education (pp. 123–128). Oxford University Press.

  52. Partti, H., & Westerlund, H. (2013). Envisioning collaborative composing in music education: Learning and negotiation of meaning in operabyyou. com. British Journal of Music Education, 30(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051713000119.

  53. Palpable, adj. & adv. (2023). In Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/1148646749.

  54. Palpable, adj. & adv. Meanings, etymology and more | oxford english dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved 30 May 2024, from https://www.oed.com/dictionary/palpable_adj

  55. Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Towards a school-based 'critical data education'. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(3), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1747527.

  56. Papageorgiou, K., & Kokshagina, O. (2022). Envisioning the future of learning for creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. In Envisioning the Future of Learning for Creativity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110752205/html?lang=en.

  57. Rosa, H. (2019). Resonanz: Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung (1. Auflage). Suhrkamp.

  58. Rosa, H., & Rüpke, J. (2024). Second Order Resonance: A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Rituals [Unpublished – under review]. Max Weber Centre.

  59. Ruthmann, S. A., & Mantie, R. (Eds.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of technology and music education. Oxford University Press.

  60. Savage, J. (2007). Reconstructing music education through ict. Research in Education, 78(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.78.6.

  61. Schuetz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 533. https://doi.org/10.2307/2102818.

  62. Schuetz, A. (1951). Choosing among projects of action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 12(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2103478.

  63. Schuetz, A. (1932). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-7091-3108-4.

  64. ScienceDirect (2020) Encyclopedia of Creativity. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com:5070/referencework/9780128156155/encyclopedia-of-creativity.

  65. Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2020). The datafication of higher education: Discussing the promises and problems. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1689388

  66. Selwyn, N., Pangrazio, L., Nemorin, S., & Perrotta, C. (2020). What might the school of 2030 be like? An exercise in social science fiction. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1694944.

  67. Simmons, G. F. (1983). Introduction to topology and modern analysis. Malabar, Fla. : R.E. Krieger Pub. Co. http://archive.org/details/introduction-to-topology-and-modern-analysis-simmons.

  68. Strang, G. (2011). Linear algebra and its applications (4th ed., India ed., 13th reprint). Cengage.

  69. The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. (n.d.). Routledge & CRC Press. Retrieved 10 May 2024, from https://www.routledge.com/The-Creative-Mind-Myths-and-Mechanisms/Boden/p/book/9780415314534.

  70. Trueman, D. (2007). Why a laptop orchestra? Organised Sound, 12(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135577180700180X.

  71. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2021). Information and communication technologies (Ict). Institute for Statistics. https://uis.unesco.org/en/glossary-term/information-and-communication-technologies-ict.

  72. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and Learning: Insights and Recommendations. Office of Educational Technology. https://www2.ed.gov/documents/ai-report/ai-report.pdf.

  73. Wallas, G. (2018). The art of thought (Hardback edition). Solis Press.

  74. Wang, G., Trueman, D., Smallwood, S., & Cook, P. R. (2008). The laptop orchestra as classroom. Computer Music Journal, 32(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1162/comj.2008.32.1.26.

  75. Wang, H., Ye, Y., Liao, X., Li, Z., & Liang, Y. (2022). A study on maker teaching activity design in senior high school general technology course for creativity cultivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886051.

  76. Whaley, J., Sloboda, J., & Gabrielsson, A. (2012). Peak experiences in music (S. Hallam, I. Cross, & M. Thaut, Eds.; Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199298457.013.0042.

  77. White, C. (2024). ­Embodied Resonance in Technology-Mediated Group Music-Making [Unpublished – under review]. Max Weber Centre.

  78. White, C., & Wilde, L. (2024a). Resonant learning phases. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.25999534.

  79. White, C., & Wilde, L. (2024b). Resonant learning (v1. 0). https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.25999639.

  80. White, C., & Wilde, L. (2024c). Second-order resonance with learning phases. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.25999618.

  81. White, C., & Wilde, L. (2024d). The creative process and resonance—Four-set venn diagram of the resonant learning concept. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.25999603.

  82. White, C., & Wilde, L. (2024e). Phases of Resonant Learning - Resonance & The Creative Process (v1. 0). Gif. 54615466 Bytes. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.26003509.

  83. White, C., & Wilde, L. (2024f). Visualizing Resonance (v1. 0).gif. 35606965 Bytes. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.25999657.

  84. White, C., & Wilde, L. (2024g). Visualizing resonant learning(v1. 0). 78819678 Bytes. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.26003800.

  85. White, C., & Wilde, L. (2024h). Visualizing Second-Order Resonance (v1. 0). [Media]. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25999855.

  86. Williamson, B. (2017). Learning in the 'platform society': Disassembling an educational data assemblage. Research in Education, 98(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523717723389.

  87. Wise, S. (2016). Secondary school teachers' approaches to teaching composition using digital technology. British Journal of Music Education, 33(3), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051716000309

  88. Wise, S., Greenwood, J., & Davis, N. (2011). Teachers' use of digital technology in secondary music education: Illustrations of changing classrooms. British Journal of Music Education, 28(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051711000039.

  89. Young, J. G. (1985). What is creativity? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(2): 77–87.

  90. Zhan, Z., Fong, P. S. W., Lin, K.-Y., Zhong, B., & Yang, H. H. (2022). Editorial: Creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: The learning science toward higher order abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1063370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063370.

bottom of page