The New Sykes-Picot: Imperial Geographies, Economic Violence and the Occupation of Northern and Eastern Syria
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 23 February 2021

The New Sykes-Picot: Imperial Geographies, Economic Violence and the Occupation of Northern and Eastern Syria

Charles A. Sills

American University of Beirut, Lebanon

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.04.01.258

Pages: 125-136

Keywords: Syria, Occupation, Imperialism, Orientalism, Liberal-Interventionism

Abstract

This article quantifies the socio-economic impact of Syria’s territorial fragmentation, framing western efforts to partition Syria against the backdrop of a broader campaign designed to achieve regime change using economic violence. While some have attempted to quantify the impact of sanctions and trade restrictions on Syrian civilians, much of the extant literature fails to address the illegal occupation of Syrian territory north and east of the Euphrates River. Critically, the direct seizure of geographic space through the occupation of Syrian territory facilitates economic violence far more effectively than sanctions alone. In western capitals, the tacit embrace of such methods indicates a re-discovery of old-line traditional territorial imperialism and the rhetorical devices needed to promote it: advocating the illegal seizure of Syrian territory demands a reinvigorated orientalist public discourse designed to promote western saviorism and the moral necessity of western interventionism. Using a hybridized research methodology incorporating qualitative and quantitative analysis, this study appraises the tangible consequences of Syria’s territorial fragmentation as experienced by Syrians while simultaneously appraising the role of orientalist, liberal-interventionist discourse in the promotion of empire.

References

  1. Adesnik, David. “New Sanctions on Assad Aim to Prevent Atrocities,” (War on the Rocks, 2020). Accessed June 29, 2020.

  2. Ahmado, Nisan. “Kurdish Officials Fear Looming US Sanctions on Syria Could Hinder IS Fight,” (Voice of America, 2020). Accessed July 2, 2020.

  3. Alam, Kamal. “Caesar Act Sanctions are Crippling Syria's Beleaguered Health Sector,” (Middle East Eye, 2020). Accessed July 31, 2020.

  4. Baldor, Lolita. “Trump OKs Wider Syria Oil Mission, Raising Legal Questions,” (Associated Press, 2019). Accessed June 19, 2020.

  5. Barfi, Barak. “Managing Washington's Flawed Partners in Eastern Syria,” (The Washington Institute, 2017). Accessed August 7, 2020.

  6. Blumi, Isa. Chaos in Yemen: Societal Collapse and the New Authoritarianism (New York: Routledge, 2011), p. 13.

  7. Butter, David. “Syria’s Economy: Picking Up the Pieces,” (Chatham House, 2015), p. 15. Accessed June 2020.

  8. Christou, Will. “Damascus Struggles to Secure Wheat Supply Amidst Coronavirus Crisis,” (Syria Direct, 2020). Accessed July 2, 2020.

  9. CIA World Fact Book: Syria (Updated June 2020). Accessed August 14, 2020.

  10. Cummings, Lindsey Elizabeth. “Economic Warfare and the Evolution of the Allied Blockade of the Eastern Mediterranean: August 1914-April 1917,” (Washington D.C.: Georgetown University-Graduate School of Arts & Sciences, 2015), p. iii.

  11. Cummings, Lindsey Elizabeth. “Economic Warfare and the Evolution of the Allied Blockade of the Eastern Mediterranean: August 1914-April 1917,” p. 89.

  12. Dabashi, Hamid. Brown Skin, White Masks, (New York: Pluto Press, 2011), p. 36. Accessed June 25, 2020.

  13. Diab, Youssef & Hajjar, Abboud. “Electricity in War-Torn Aleppo: A New Form of Urban Management,” (Metro Politics.org, 2018). Accessed July 21, 2020.

  14. Diwan, Roger. “Opinion: Why Syria’s Oil Matters,” (National Public Radio, 2019). Accessed June 25, 2020.

  15. Cox, Elizabeth. “Voices from Syria: A Pastoral Visit to Damascus, Saidnaya, Maaloula, Homs and Aleppo,” (Humanitarian Aid Relief Trust, Syria Visit Report, 2018), p. 13.

  16. Enab Biladi. “US Strike Hits Syrian Regime Position Near Al-Tanf,” (2018). Accessed June 20, 2020.

  17. Esber, Fadi. “Syria-Iraq trade stymied by US border presence,” (Asia Times, 2019). Accessed July 29, 2020.

  18. Faidhi, Karwan. “2 SDF Killed in Clashes with Armed Tribes in Eastern Syria: Commander,” (Rudaw, 2020). Accessed August 10, 2020.

  19. Al-Faisal, Waleed et. al. “Syria: Effects of Conflict and Sanctions on Public Health,” (Journal of Public Health, Volume 35, Issue 2, June 2013), pp. 195–199.

  20. Finnegan, Connor. “'We're keeping the oil' in Syria, Trump says, but it's considered a war crime,” (ABC News, 2019). Accessed May 13, 2020.

  21. Fleischer, Corinne. “World Food Programme: Syria Country Brief,” (World Food Programme, 2020). Accessed July 2, 2020.

  22. Forte, Maximillian. Slouching Towards Sirte: NATO’s War on Libya and Africa, (Montreal: Baraka Books, 2012), p. 20.

  23. France24. “In Syria's Breadbasket, Kurds and Regime Battle for Wheat,” (2019). Accessed July 2, 2020.

  24. Hamidi, Ibrahim. “Conflict over Syria’s Wheat Crops,” (Asharq al-Awsat, 2020). Accessed July 31, 2020.

  25. International Committee of the Red Cross. “The Law of Armed Conflict: Belligerent Occupation,” (United for Relations with Armed and Security Forces, 2002), p. 5. Accessed August 19, 2020.

  26. International Crisis Group. “U.S. Sanctions on Syria: What Comes Next?” (2020). Accessed July 30, 2020.

  27. Al-Jazeera. “Syria, Russia Condemn US-led Strike on pro-Assad Forces,” (2017). Accessed June 20, 2020.

  28. Khalel, Sheren. “'Wise diplomacy': How will Biden tackle US foreign policy towards Syria?” (Middle East Eye, 2021). Accessed February 9, 2021.

  29. Kherallah, Mazen et al. “Health care in Syria Before and During the Crisis,” (Avicenna Journal of Medicine, vol. 2, 3, 2012), pp. 51-53.

  30. Kinzer, Stephen. “End Human Rights Imperialism Now,” (Guardian, 2010). Accessed June 22, 2020.

  31. Lister, Charles. “Is Assad About to Fall,” (Politico, 2020). Accessed June 29, 2020.

  32. Massad, Joseph. “Secular Liberals Destroyed the Arab Uprisings. Don’t Let it Happen Again,” (Middle East Eye, 2021).

  33. McElroy, Damien. “Stark Warning of Dangers of Syrian Famine from UN food Programme Chief,” (The National, 2020). Accessed July 3, 2020.

  34. Nehme, Dahlia. “Syria Sanctions Indirectly Hit Children's Cancer Treatment,” (Reuters, 2017). Accessed July 22, 2020.

  35. Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights. “UN expert says unilateral coercive measures exacerbate humanitarian crisis in Syria,” (United Nations, 2018). Accessed July 21, 2020.

  36. Office of the United Nations Resident Coordinator in the Syrian Arab Republic. “Study on Humanitarian Impact of Syria Related Unilateral Restrictive Measures,” p. 20. (2016). Accessed August 2, 2020.

  37. Petti, Matthew. “Take the Oil? American Oil Company Finally Gets a Syrian Oil Deal,” (The National Interest, 2020). Accessed July 31, 2020.

  38. Pew Research Center. “Americans divided over decision to withdraw from Syria,” (2019). Accessed May 27, 2020.

  39. Regional Food Security Analysis Network. “Syria Agricultural Production and Cross-Border Trade Study: Roundtable Policy Discussions Report,” (Regional Food Security Analysis Network, 2016), p. 6. Accessed July 26, 2020.

  40. Rym, Ghazal. “Lebanon’s Dark Days of Hunger: The Great Famine of 1915-18,” (The National, 2015). Accessed June 28, 2020.

  41. Sills, Charles A., and Al-Kassimi, Khaled. “Sanctioning Arabia through the Caesar Act: Economic Violence & Imperial Anxieties in the ‘Middle East.’” Asian Institute of Research, Journal of Social and Political Sciences, Vol.3, No.3 (2020), p. 790.

  42. Sliney, Samantha Arrington. “Right to Act: United States Legal Basis Under the Law of Armed Conflict to Pursue the Islamic State in Syria,” University of Miami National Security & Armed Conflict Law Review, pp. 13, 23.

  43. Stocker, Joanne. “US May Leave Troops to Protect Eastern Syria Oil Fields, Esper says,” (The Defense Post, 2019). Accessed June 23, 2020.

  44. Spyer, Jonathan. “Trump’s Syria Policy Is Working,” (Foreign Policy, 2020). Accessed July 2, 2020.

  45. “Syria - Review on the Impact of Rising Food Prices, Food Security Update: March 2020,” (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, 2020). Accessed July 4, 2020.

  46. Al-Tamimi, Aymenn Jawad. “The People's Municipal Office of al-Basira: Interview,” Accessed July 5, 2020.

  47. Al-Tamimi, Aymenn Jawad. “The People's Municipal Office of Dhiban: Interview,” (Aymenn Jawad al-Tamimi’s Blog, 2020). Accessed July 5, 2020.

  48. Al-Tamimi, Aymenn Jawad. “The People's Municipal Office in Gharanij: Interview,” (Aymenn Jawad al-Tamimi’s Blog, 2020). Accessed July 5, 2020.

  49. Thompson, Elizabeth. Colonial Citizens: Republican Rights, Paternal Privilege, and Gender in French Syria and Lebanon, (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000), p. 21.

  50. Thompson, Elizabeth. Colonial Citizens, p. 20-22.

  51. U.N. Human Rights Council. “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights on his mission to the Syrian Arab Republic,” (Human Rights Council, Thirty-sixth session, 10–28 September 2018, Agenda item 3). Accessed May 28, 2020.

  52. Thirty-sixth session, 10–28 September 2018, Agenda item 3). Accessed May 28, 2020.

  53. United States Department of Agriculture. “Syria: Wheat Production,” (United States Department of Agriculture: International Productive Assessment Division, 2016). Accessed July 2, 2020.

  54. United States Department of Defense. “Defense Budget Overview: United States Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Overview,” (Office of the Under Secretary of Defense/Comptroller/Chief Financial Officer, 2019). Accessed June 19, 2020.

  55. United States Department of State. “Country Summary, Syria,” (August 2004). https://2009-2017.state.gov/outofdate/bgn/syria/47567.htm, Accessed August 2, 2020.

  56. World Bank. “Syrian Arab Republic: Electricity Sector Strategy Note,” (Sustainable Development Department, Middle East and North Africa Region, Report No. 49923-SY). Accessed July 21, 2020.

  57. Zinn, Howard. A People’s History of the United States, (New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2003), p. 359.

bottom of page