Importance of Cultural Heritage in a Post-Disaster Setting: Perspectives from the Kathmandu Valley
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 20 June 2019

Importance of Cultural Heritage in a Post-Disaster Setting: Perspectives from the Kathmandu Valley

Chandani KC, Sadasivam Karuppannan, Alpana Sivam

The University of South Australia, Australia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.02.02.82

Pages: 429-442

Keywords: Natural Disaster, Cultural Heritage, Historic Cities, Developing Countries, Intangible, Kathmandu Valley

Abstract

This paper explores the role of cultural heritage in a post-disaster setting and its importance in maintaining the social and cultural values in the redevelopment of areas damaged by an earthquake. It uses a case study method with the Kathmandu Valley in Nepal as the case study site. Intangible heritage in the valley such as daily rituals, festivals, and processions helped people to overcome the traumatic experiences of the disaster and helped communities reconnect with each other. Findings from the research show that cultural heritage plays an important role in helping people readjust their lives after major disasters such as the 2015 Nepal earthquake. It argues for recognition of cultural heritage in the post-disaster recovery and redevelopment process.

References

  1. Baer, N.S. (1991). Assessment and management of risks to cultural property. In N.S. Baer, C. Sabbioni & A.I. Sors (Eds.), Science, Technology and European Cultural Heritage (pp. 27-36). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

  2. Bhandari, R.B. (2014). Social capital in disaster risk management; a case study of social capital mobilization following the 1934 Kathmandu Valley earthquake in Nepal. Disaster Prevention and Management, 23(4), 314-328.

  3. Bhandari, R.B., Okada N. and Knottnerus, J.D. (2011). Urban ritual events and coping with disaster risk a case study of Lalitpur, Nepal. Journal of Applied Social Science, 5(2), 13-32.

  4. Donaldson, M.W. (1998). The first ten days emergency response and protection strategies for the Preservation of historic structure. In D.H.R. Spennemann and D.W. Look (Eds.), Disaster Management Programs for Historic Sites  (pp. 25-30).. San Francisco, California: U.S. National Park Service, Western Chapter of the Association for Preservaion Technology and Charles Sturt University.

  5. Eyre, A. (1999). In remembrance: post-disaster rituals and symbols. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 14(3), 23.

  6. Fields, B., Wagner, J. and Frisch, M. (2014).  Placemaking and disaster recovery: targeting place for recovery in post-Katrina New Orleans, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(1), 38-56.

  7. Government of Nepal, World Heritage Centre and UNESCO-Kathmandu Office (2007). Integrated Management Framework. Kathmandu, Nepal.

  8. Government of Nepal (2015). Post Disaster Needs Assessment, Vol. B: Sector Reports.  Kathmandu.

  9. Hollow R. and  Spennemann, D.H.R. (2001). Managing sites of human atrocity. Cultural Resource Management, 24(8), 35-36.

  10. ICIMOD, UNEP and Government of Nepal (2007). Kathmandu Valley Environment Outlook. Kathmandu, Nepal: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development. Retrieved 9 June, 2018, from http://www.unep.org/pdf/KathmanduValleyOutlook.pdf

  11. Kathmandu Valley Development Authority (2016). Vision 2035 and Beyond 20 Years Strategic Development Master Plan (2015 - 2035) for Kathmandu Valley. Kathmandu, Nepal.

  12. Langenbach R. (2001). A rich heritage host: the Bhuj, India earthquake. Cultural Resource Management, 24(8), 30-35.

  13. Mackee, J., Haugen, H.A. and Askew, L. (2014). Recovering cultural built heritage after natural disasters. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(2), 202-212.

  14. Maio, R., Ferreira, T.M and. Vicente, R. (2017). A critical discussion on the earthquake risk mitigation of urban cultural heritage assets. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 27, 239-247.

  15. Nelson, C.L. (1991). Protecting the Past from Natural Disasters. Washington DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation.

  16. Shrestha, B. (2011). Street typology in Kathmandu and street transformation. Urbani Izziv, 22(2), 107-121.

  17. Silva, K. (2015). The spirit of place of Bhaktapur, Nepal. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(8), 820-841.

  18. Spennemann, D. (1999).  Cultural heritage conservation during emergency management: luxury or necessity? International Journal of Public Administration, 22(6), 745.

  19. Spennemann, D.H.R and Graham, K. (2007). The importance of heritage preservation in natural  disaster situations. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 7(6/7).

  20. Stovel, H. (1998). Risk Preparedness: A Management manual for World Cultural Heritage, Rome, Italy: International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Property.

  21. Suri, K. (2018). Understanding historical, cultural and religious frameworks of mountain communities and disasters in Nubra valley of Ladakh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31, 504-513.

  22. Thapa, R.B., Murayama Y. and Ale S. (2008). Kathmandu. Cities, 25(1), 45-57.

  23. Thornburg, P.A., Knottnerus J.D. and G.R. Webb (2007). Disaster and deritualization: A re-interpretation of findings from early disaster research. The Social Science Journal, 44(1), 161-166.

  24. Toffin, G. (1990).  Mythical and symbolic origins of the city - the case of the Kathmandu valley. Diogenes, 152, 101-123.

  25. UNESCO (1990). Third medium term plan 1990-1995. Retrieved 15 July, 2017, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0008/000825/082539eb.pdf

  26. UNESCO (2015a). Tangible cultural heritage. Retrieved 4 February, 2016, from  http://www.unesco.org/new/en/cairo/culture/tangible-cultural-heritage

  27. UNESCO (2015b). Intangible cultural heritage. Retreived 2 February, 2016, fromhttp://www.unesco.org/new/en/cairo/culture/intangible-cultural-heriatge

  28. UNESCO (2016). The Kathmandu valley. Retreived 2 March, 2016, from http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/121/,2016

  29. UNISDR (2009). UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. Geneva, Switzerland: United National International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR). 

  30. Weise, K. (2014). Management of living urban world heritage: Kathmandu Valley. Context, 10(2), 125-134.

  31. Wenger D.E. and Weller, J.M. (1973). Disaster subcultures: the cultural residues of community disaster. Retreived 12 April, 2017, from http://udspace.udel.edu/bitstream/handle/19716/399/PP9.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y

  32. Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research : design and methods. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.

bottom of page