top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 16 December 2024

Effects of Financial Pressures to Business Performance: The Case of a Social Enterprise in Lanao del Sur, Philippines

Mary Joy F. Celeste, Pamela F. Resurreccion

MSU-Iligan Institute of Technology, Philippines

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.07.04.535

Pages: 166-174

Keywords: Social Entrepreneurship, Financial Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals, Financial Performance, Social Performance

Abstract

Social enterprises play a crucial role in addressing the challenges of inclusive growth, particularly in areas with volatile economies marked by disasters and conflicts, such as Lanao del Sur, Philippines. Social enterprises are unique due to their dual-centric mission, which pursues both social impact and economic goals. Anchored on Resource Dependence Theory and Institutional Theory, this study investigated the impact of financial pressures on the social and financial performance of a social enterprise in Lanao del Sur. A qualitative approach was employed, utilizing in-depth interviews and thematic analysis to uncover patterns, themes, and narratives related to financial pressures and balancing dual missions (Braun & Clarke, 2006). The findings revealed that financial pressures stemming from income instability, cash flow shortages, liquidity crises, and financial strains significantly impair operational capabilities, hindering both the social and financial performance of the social enterprise. Furthermore, the study highlighted the vital role of government and non-government organizations in aiding the social enterprise. Grants, mentorship, networks, and collaborations helped the business survive and thrive amidst financial challenges. However, while these different types of support ensure implementation of social goals, they also indirectly exert pressure on the social enterprise to prioritize financial goals, potentially compromising their social performance. Thus, the study underscored the importance of balancing the dual mission, offering valuable information for social enterprises and other stakeholders in crafting effective programs, strategies, and initiatives that facilitate the achievement of both the social and financial goals of social enterprises while contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by fostering inclusive growth.

References

  1. Ahlgren, J., & Se, J.-S. L. (2018). Master Programme in Innovation and Spatial Dynamics Social Impact and Its Challenges in Social Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation-A Case Study of Social Impact in Sweden. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. www.ehl.lu.se

  2. Agafonow, A. (2014). Social Entrepreneurship: A Pathway to Economic Development in Africa? Journal of African Business, 15(1-2), 25-33.

  3. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307

  4. Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In Search of the Hybrid Ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 51-57.

  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

  6. British Council (2017). Social Enterprise in the Philippines: A Mapping Study. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.ph/sites/default/files/social_enterprise_in_the_philippines_a_mapping_study.pdf

  7. Bugg-Levine, A., Kogut, B., Kulatilaka, N., & Rashid, M. (2012). A New Approach to Funding Social Enterprises. Harvard Business Review, 90(6), 118-123.

  8. Chaturvedi, R., & Karri, A. (2022). Entrepreneurship in the Times of Pandemic: Barriers and Strategies. FIIB Business Review, 11(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211043799

  9. Chinakidzwa, S., & Phiri, M. (2020). The Role of Human Resource Management Practices in Social Enterprises: A Systematic Review. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 301-321.

  10. Costanzo, L. A., Vurro, C., Foster, D., Servato, F., & Perrini, F. (2014). Dual‐Mission Management in Social Entrepreneurship: Qualitative Evidence from Social Firms in the United Kingdom. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(4), 655-677.

  11. Darko, A., & Koranteng, A. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in Ghana: A review of concepts, theories, and empirical evidence. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 139-163.

  12. Defourney, O., & Nyssens, M. (2006). Defining social enterprise. Social Enterprise Journal, 2(1), 1-22.

  13. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417-436.

  14. Dono, G., Buttinelli, R., & Cortignani, R. (2022). Financial Performance of Connected Agribusiness Activities in Italian Agriculture. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 11(2), 147-169. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-12211

  15. Duan, H., & Yang, Y. (2024). Mission Statement Components and Social Enterprise Sustainability: Findings from a Mixed-Method Approach. Sustainability, 16(9), 3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093758

  16. El Ebrashi, R. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship: Definition and Boundaries. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 9(3), 5-28.

  17. Felden, C., & Wenzel, L. (2019). The Role of Case Study Research in Understanding Complex Phenomena. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 14(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-04-2018-1632

  18. Haigh, N., & Hoffmann, S. (2014). Hybrid Organizations: Origins, Strategies, Impacts, and Implications. California Management Review, 56(3), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.3.5

  19. Harsanto, B., Mulyana, A., Faisal, Y. A., Shandy, V. M., & Alam, M. (2022). A Systematic Review on Sustainability-Oriented Innovation in the Social Enterprises. Sustainability, 14(22), 14771. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214771

  20. Gregory, A., Ngo, L. V., & Karavdic, M. (2019). Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship Research and Theory: A Bibliometric Analysis from 1991 to 2018. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(4), 427-452.

  21. Haugh, H., & Talwar, A. (2016). Understanding and Combating Mission Drift in Social Enterprises. California Management Review, 58(3), 116-133.

  22. Hulgård, L., & Andersen, L. B. (2013). How Community Ventures Mobilise Resources Developing Resource Dependence and Embeddedness. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 303-321.

  23. Ibrahim, A., & Hemavathi, S. (2020). Why Mission Drift Happens Within Social Enterprises. [Master's thesis, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies]. Uppsala University DiVA Portal. https://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1449002/ATTACHMENT01.pdf

  24. Isenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. The Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, Wellesley College.

  25. Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2020). The Role of Social Enterprises in the Sustainable Development Goals: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(5), 1739-1755.

  26. Kwong, C. K., Wong, K. F., & Wong, C. H. (2017). Balancing Financial and Social Performance: The Role of Social Enterprises in the Community. Social Enterprise Journal, 13(1), 2-20.

  27. Liu, Y., & Li, Y. (2017). The Effect of Entrepreneurial Passion and Political Behavior on Entrepreneurial Identity: Based on Resource Dependence Theory. Journal of Business and Economics, 8(6), 385-391.

  28. Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. R. (2015). Getting Beyond Better: How Social Entrepreneurship Works. [iPad version]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

  29. Moss, T. W., Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Dual Identities in Social Ventures: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 1-17.

  30. Noor, A. A. M., Isa, M. F. M., & Manaf, A. (2018). Employees with Disabilities: Malaysian Employers’ Reflections. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i12/3610

  31. Nowell, L., Norris, J. M., White, D., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

  32. Omorede, A. (2014). Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 299-316.

  33. Oliński, M., & Mioduszewski, J. (2022). Determinants of Development of Social Enterprises According to the Theory of Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 14(23), 15679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315679

  34. Peoples, H., Nissen, N., Brandt, Å., & Cour, K. L. (2020). Perceptions of Quality of Life by People with Advanced Cancer Who Live at Home. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 84(11), 723-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022620976839

  35. Rabi, A. R. J. (2017). How Social Enterprises Manage Mission Drift: A Systematic Review (Autumn Semester, 2016). (910210). 69 pages. DiVA Portal. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1076297/FULLTEXT01.pdf

  36. Ramus, C., & Vaccaro, A. (2014). The Role of Social Enterprises in the Development of the Social Economy: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(4), 651-663

  37. Santos, F., Pache, A. C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making Hybrids Work: Aligning Business Models and Organizational Design for Social Enterprises. California Management Review, 57(3), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.3.36

  38. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016). Business Models for Sustainability: A Co-Evolutionary Analysis of Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264-289.

  39. Seda, A., & Ismail, M. (2020). Challenges Facing Social Entrepreneurship: The Implications for Government Policy in Egypt. Review of Economics and Political Science, 5(2), 162-182. https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-03-2019-0036

  40. Tanimoto, K. (2012). The Emergent Process of Social Innovation: Multi-Stakeholders Perspective. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 4(3/4), 267–280.

  41. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

bottom of page