Effectivity of Communication General Election Commission Tangerang City in Socialization About “Kotak Kosong”
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Journal of Social and Political

Sciences

ISSN 2615-3718 (Online)

ISSN 2621-5675 (Print)

asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
asia insitute of research, journal of social and political sciences, jsp, aior, journal publication, humanities journal, social journa
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 15 April 2019

Effectivity of Communication General Election Commission Tangerang City in Socialization About “Kotak Kosong”

Nawiroh Vera, Khaerul Azmi

Universitas Budi Luhur, Indonesia

journal of social and political sciences
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1991.02.02.67

Pages: 260-268

Keywords: Effectiveness, Socialization, General Election Commission (KPU), Empty Box

Abstract

In June 2018 Indonesia conducted the general election of the regional head (pilkada) simultaneously. The interesting thing about pilkada this time is the emergence of the phenomenon of a single candidate in some area. One area that has a single candidate in the city of Tangerang. Voter ballots where there is only a single candidate, the partner is an empty box. Not all societies understand what an empty box is, so socialization is needed for the community to understand. The purpose of this research is to know and analyze the effectiveness of socialization about "empty box" conducted by the General Election Commission (KPU) Tangerang City in Tangerang mayoral election in 2018. This research approach is quantitative. The methods that were used is the survey method with descriptive type. The technique of data retrieval is done through questionnaires distributed to the respondents selected by purposive. The subjects of this study are the people of Tangerang City who have the right to vote which is categorized based on age that is 17 years old until 60 years old. Based on the result of the preliminary survey, it is known that the socialization conducted by KPU-Tangerang has not been effective yet, from 100 respondents obtained 50% result know about the existence of ‘kotak kosong' (empty box) while 50% others do not know. Of the respondents who knew about the empty box, 89% were obtained from the Network of Empty Boxes, not from the KPU.

References

  1. Andre, Hardjana (2000). Audit Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek, Jakarta: Grasindo

  2. Ardianto, Elvinaro (2010). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Public Relations Kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

  3. Aw, Suranto (2005). Komunikasi Perkantoran, (Prinsip Komunikasi Meningkatkan Kinerja Perkantoran). Yogyakata: Media Wacana

  4. Cakra Arbas. (2012). Jalan Terjal Calon Independen pada Pemilukada di Provinsi Aceh. Jakarta: Sofmedia.

  5. Jalaludin Rakhmat (2009).  Metode Penelitian Komunikasi,dilengkapi contoh analisis statistik. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

  6. Kartika, Titiek. (2016). Penyelenggaraan Pilkada gubernur Bengkulu 2015. Jakarta: Yayasan pustaka Obor Indonesia.

  7. Maran, Rafael Raga (2001). Pengantar Sosiologi Politik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

  8. Mulyana, Deddy (2000). Human Communication Prinsip-prinsip Dasar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

  9. Rachmat Kriyantono (2010). Teknis Praktis Riset Komunikasi: Disertai Contoh Praktis Riset Media, Public Relations, Advertising,Komunikasi Organisasi,Komunikasi Pemasaran, Cetakan ke-5.Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.

  10. Sugiyono (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan KualitatifR&D.Bandung: Alfabeta.

  11. Mandagi, Stevani et al. 2009. Efektivitas Sosialisasi Pemberian dan Penghitungan Suara Pada Pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Legislatif (PILEG) Tahun 2009 di Kecamatan Tomohon Utara Kota Tomohon”.

  12. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/992-ID-efektivitas-sosialisasi-pemberian-dan-penghitungan-suara-pada-pelaksanaan-pemili.pdf.

  13. http://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/62315/Chapter II.pdf;jsessionid=32787 (Arbas 2012).

  14. https://hukamnas.com/pengertian-pilkada-serentak.

  15. https://www.kajianpustaka.com/2016/11/pemilihan-kepala-daerah-pilkada.htm.

  16. https://www.academia.edu/13157558/BAB_I_Pengantar_Psikologi_Komunikasi.

  17. http://proaksi.co.id/2018/06/26/kenapa-harus-kotak-kosong/

  18. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/02/20/13275281/partai-politik-yang-bertarung-di-pemilu-dari-masa-ke-masa.

bottom of page