Economics and Business
Quarterly Reviews
ISSN 2775-9237 (Online)
Published: 31 October 2024
Literature Review of Measuring Operational Efficiency of Commercial Banks using DEA Model
Huyen Ngo Khanh
Thang Long University, Vietnam
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1992.07.04.620
Pages: 68-74
Keywords: DEA Model, Commercial Bank, Operational Efficiency, Bibliometrics
Abstract
This paper examines the operational efficiency of commercial banks through the lens of the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model, highlighting its significance in assessing banking performance in a rapidly evolving financial landscape. By analyzing key literature and trends, the study identifies critical factors influencing bank efficiency, including technological advancements, sustainability, and regulatory frameworks. It also explores the impact of digital transformation on traditional banking operations and emphasizes the importance of customer-centric approaches in enhancing service efficiency. Furthermore, the paper discusses future research directions, such as the integration of artificial intelligence and big data analytics, cross-country comparisons, and the relationship between operational efficiency and risk management. Ultimately, this study aims to provide insights for scholars and practitioners seeking to enhance the competitiveness and resilience of commercial banks in an increasingly complex global environment.
References
Asmild, M., Paradi, J. C., Aggarwal, V., & Schaffnit, C. (2004). Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 67-89. [DOI: 10.1023/B .0000012453.91326.ec]
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092. [DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078]
Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175-212. [DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00342-6]
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. [DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8]
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Springer Science & Business Media. [ISBN: 978-90-277-1924-0]
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA, 295(1), 90-93.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research(pp. 257-276). Springer.
Li, K., Rollins, J., & Yan, E. (2018). Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics, 115(1), 1-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2622-5
Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Springer Science & Business Media.
Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270-1288. [DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270]
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.