Unlocking the Potential of Visionary Leadership: A Study on Shared Vision, Teamwork and Team Performance
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 01 May 2024

Unlocking the Potential of Visionary Leadership: A Study on Shared Vision, Teamwork and Team Performance

Pauline P. L. Chin

Meragang Sixth Form College

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.07.02.578

Pages: 77-95

Keywords: Visionary Leadership, Shared Vision, Teamwork, Team Performance

Abstract

This study investigates the intricate dynamics of visionary leadership within educational institutions. Two key research questions guide the investigation, and through thematic analysis, the study extracts valuable insights from educators' responses regarding the role of leaders in fostering a conducive learning environment. The findings underscore the critical role of visionary leadership in enhancing team performance by fostering a sense of belonging, commitment and unity. Actively engaging the team in shaping a shared vision is revealed as a catalyst for promoting open communication, inclusivity, and empowerment. The study emphasises the importance of visionary leaders in cultivating a positive organisational culture by aligning individual and collective efforts with ambitious, unattainable visions, thereby contributing to a culture of continuous improvement and excellence. Moreover, the study sheds light on the impact of a leader's focus on teamwork and a shared vision. It highlights the significance of aligning individual and collective efforts with a shared vision, serving as a guiding force for fostering a collective sense of direction and purpose. By prioritising teamwork and core values, leaders contribute to a positive organisational culture, underscoring the importance of balancing adaptability with a steadfast commitment to the organisational vision. The study advocates a holistic approach to leadership that integrates visionary principles, transparent communication and adaptability. Fostering a positive organisational culture, prioritising teacher motivation and nurturing creativity collectively create a dynamic and thriving educational environment. The study also recognises limitations related to diverse organisational contexts and leadership styles, social desirability and the need for a cautious interpretation of results. The insights generated offer practical guidance for educational leaders seeking to enhance team effectiveness and success, emphasising the pivotal role of visionary leadership in shaping organisational performance and culture.

References

  1. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behaviour. Psychological Review. 64 (6, Pt.1). 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445

  2. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: London: Free Press; Collier Macmillan

  3. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095

  4. Benjamin, G.C. (2020). Visionary leadership, visionary goals: American Journal of Public Health. 110 (4). 427-428. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305501

  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). What can ‘‘thematic analysis’’ offer health and well-being researchers? International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. 9. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.26152

  6. Chen, H.-H., & Yuan, Y.-H. (2021). The study of the relationships of teacher’s creative teaching, imagination, and principal’s visionary leadership. SAGE Open. 11 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211029932

  7. Dawkins, S., Martin, A., Scott, J., Sanderson, K., & Schuz, B. (2021). A cross-level model of team-level psychological capital and individual-and team-level outcomes. Journal of Management and Organisation. 27 (2). 397 – 416. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.27

  8. Day, D. V. (2014). The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. Oxford University Press.

  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. Springer New York: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.

  11. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of science. Annual review of organizational psychology and organisational behaviour. 4. 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108

  12. Eccles, J. S., Roeser, R., Vida, M., Fredricks, J., & Wigfield, A. (2006). Motivational and Achievement Pathways Through Middle Childhood. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.). Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues. 325–355. Psychology Press.

  13. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology. 53 (1). 109 – 132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

  14. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 61. 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859

  15. Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development. 3. 1017–1095. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  16. Jovanovic, D., & Ciric, M. (2016). Benefits of Transformational Leadership in the Context of Education. In A. Sandu, T. Ciulei, & A. Frunza (Eds.) Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty. European proceedings of social and behavioural sciences 15. 496 – 503. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2016.09.64

  17. Lancefield, D., & Rangen, C. (2021). 4 Actions transformational leaders take. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/05/4-actions-transformational-leaders-take

  18. Martela, F., & Tapani, J. J. (2018). Autonomy, competence, relatedness and beneficence: A multicultural comparison of the four pathways to meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01157

  19. Parker, M. (2012). Super flat: Hierarchy, culture and dimensions of organizing. In Diefenbach, T and Todnem By, R (Ed). Reinventing Hierarchy and Bureaucracy – from the Bureau to Network Organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organization. 35. 229 – 247. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000035011

  20. Peterson, C., Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1993). Learned helplessness: A theory for the age of personal control. Oxford University Press. https://archive.org/details/learnedhelplessn00chri

  21. Proudfoot, K. (2023). Inductive/Deductive Hybrid Thematic Analysis in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 17 (3). 308 – 326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816

  22. Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., and Eccles, J. S. (2019). “Expectancy-value theory and its relevance for student motivation and learning,” in The Cambridge handbook of motivation and learning, eds K. A. Renninger and S. E. Hidi. 617–644. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823279.026

  23. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 61. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

  24. Sashkin, M., & Sashkin, M. G. (2003). Leadership that matters: The critical factors for making a difference in people’s lives and organizations’ success. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. https://www.leadershipnow.com/leadershop/5193-7.html

  25. Taylor C. M., Cornelius C. J., & Colvin K. (2014). Visionary leadership and its relationship to organizational effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 35 (6). 566 -583.  https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2012-0130

  26. Wallace R. C. Jr., Engel D. E., & Mooney J. E. (1997). The learning school: A guide to vision-based leadership. Corwin Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED413664

  27. Weinstein, N., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2012). Motivation, meaning, and wellness: a self-determination perspective on the creation and internalization of personal meanings and life goals. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.) The human quest for meaning: Theories, research, and applications. 81 – 106. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

  28. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review. 12. 265-310. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P

bottom of page