top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 10 December 2024

The Fields of Pragmatic Discourse Analysis

Ayten Rahimli Muzaffar

Baku State University, Azerbaijan

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.07.04.540

Pages: 244-250

Keywords: Linguistics, Language, Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics, Text, The Methods, Science

Abstract

The article is devoted to the fields of pragmatic discourse analysis. Pragmatic approach to the discourse takes into account all the aspects of communication including both linguistic and extra-linguistic units, and provides efficient tools for affecting an addressee. The article has been written on the basis of synchronic descriptive method in the study of the English language. It is noted in this article that discourse analysis (discourse analysis) is a set of methods and techniques for interpreting various types of texts or statements as products of speech activity. The pragmatic approach to discourse involves analyzing it from the standpoint of speech acts, which allows us to consider pragmatics as one of the areas of discursive research. It is also stated that some definitions of pragmatics are almost identical to some definitions of discourse analysis, which may lead us to think that both fields of study are the same.

References

  1. Benveniste E. (1971) Problems in General Linguistics. Front Cover. University of Miami Press, - Language Arts & Disciplines - 317 pages.

  2. Chafe, William (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 21—51.

  3. Chudinov A. (2007) Political linguistics: a tutorial. Moscow, Pp. 7–8.

  4. Guillaume J. Maldidier D. (1999) On new methods of interpretation, or the problem of meaning from the point of view of discourse analysis // Quadrature of meaning. Moscow, pp. 124-136.

  5. Hoffman V. (1983) The language of the symbolists // LN, M., 1937, vol. 27-28.  Greimas A.J. Courtet J.(1982) Semiotics. Explanatory dictionary of the theory of language // Semiotics. M., pp. 481-550.

  6. Kobozeva I.( 2003). Intentional and cognitive aspects of semantic utterance: diss. Doctor of Philological Sciences. Moscow, Page 112.

  7. Katz I. J., Fodor J. A. (1963.) The structure of a semantic theory. Language. Baltimore.pp. 170-210.

  8. Leech G. N. (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. 265 p.

  9. L. de Saussure, (2007). Procedural Pragmatics and the Study of Discourse. Universite de Neuchatel. Pp 139-158.

  10. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. (2001) Third edition with New Words supplement. Б.м., s. 30.

  11. Morris C.W. (2001) Foundations of the theory of signs // Semiotics: Anthology. Moscow, , pp. 45-97

  12. Morris C. (1983) Foundations of the theory of signs // Semiotics. Moscow, Page 63.

  13. Ozhegov S. (1997) Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language / edited by N. Yu. Shvedova. 4th ed., suppl.

  14. M., P. 689. Serio P. (1999) How texts are read in France // The quadrature of meaning. Moscow, pp. 12-53.

  15. Searle J.R. (1986) Classification of illocutionary acts // New in foreign linguistics. Issue 17. Moscow, pp. 170-194.

  16. Searle, J. (1968) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.203.

  17. Van Dijk T.A. (2012) Editor’s Introduction: The Study of Discourse : An Introduction. The Emergence of a New CrossDiscipline. 14 p. URL:  http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/The%20study%20of%20discourse.pd

  18. Van Dijk T. A. (1998). Towards a definition of discourse. [www-document] URL  http://www.nsu.ru/psych/internet/bits/vandijk2.htm

bottom of page