Education Quarterly Reviews
ISSN 2621-5799
Published: 16 August 2021
The Effect of Social Studies Courses on Digital Self Formation in Turkey
Erol KOÇOĞLU
The University of Inonu, Turkey
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.337
Pages: 261-270
Keywords: Digitization, Digital Self, Social Studies, Teacher, Perception
Abstract
The world, which includes all living things from the first human to the present, is based on the process of change and transformation with all its dimensions. It can be stated that this process of change and transformation affects the lives of many living things on earth, as well as remarkable effects on human life. In particular, the digital world, which is one of the important results of technology-based development, can be said to be effective in shaping human life cognitively, psychomotorically and emotionally. This shaping process takes place in educational institutions with the achievements transferred through various fields of study and disciplines. This study, in which the effect of social studies courses on the formation and development process of the digital self-concept, which is based on the cognitive effects of digitalization, was evaluated in line with the perceptions of teachers in Turkey, was designed according to the phenomenological approach, one of the qualitative research methods. The research data were analyzed with the descriptive analysis technique and thematic codes were created based on the findings. A semi-structured interview form prepared by the researchers was used to collect data. The research data, the answers to the questions in the interview form, were collected through online interviews with social studies teachers due to the Covid-19 epidemic in the world and in Turkey. In the study supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of İnönü University with the Normal Research Project coded SBA-2019-1755, the data obtained were analyzed and the findings were presented in tables and figures. Considering the findings of the study, it can be said that the social studies teachers who make up the study group have different and remarkable perceptions about the effects of social studies lessons on digital self-creation.
References
Allport, G. (1950). The individual and his religion: A psychological interpretation. England: Macmillan: Oxford.
Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Yıldırım, E., & Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2001). Research Methods in Social Sciences. Sakarya: Sakarya Bookstore.
Armağan, A.(2013). Investigation of formative variables in the effect of self-esteem on body image in obese women. Okan University Social Sciences University Unpublished Master Thesis.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches: Sage publications.
Gray-Little, B., Williams, V.S.L., & Hancock, T. D. (1997). An item response theory analysis of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 443-451.
Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology. A Constructivist Perspective, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Merrill.
Mead, G. H. (1972). Mind, Self, and Society. C. W. Morris (Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Morva, O. (2014). Goffman's dramaturgical approach and identity design in digital environment: A review on the Social Network Facebook. In N. Timisi, & S. Çakır (Dr.), Media and Design (pp. 231-253). Istanbul: Urzeni Publishing.
Morva, O. (2016). Me, myself and my digital self: On Self-Conceptualization in the Age of Digital Communication. Digital Concepts, Possibilities, Experiences. Istanbul: Kalkedon Publications.
Nokelainen, P. (2006). An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (2), 178-197.
Okcebe, Y.(2019). The change of digital selves according to digital scenes in social media. Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences Unpublished Master Thesis.
Özen, Y., & Gül, A. (2007). The universe-sample problem in social and educational sciences research. Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 15, 394-422.
Patchin, J.W., & Hinduja, S.(2017). Digital self-harm among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61,761-766.
Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. London: Sage Publication.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing House.
Yılmaz Aslan, H.(2016). A compilation: Some approaches and definitions of the self-concept. Journal of Social Sciences, 48 (8), 82- 95.