top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 30 November 2023

Student Responses to Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka Regarding Learning Loss When Experiences Outside Campus

Suyono, Agus Purnomo, Nevy Farista Aristin

Universitas Negeri Malang, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.06.04.790

Pages: 114-120

Keywords: MBKM, Curriculum, Learning, Responses

Abstract

The Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) has entered its fourth year in 2023. During its implementation, there was dynamic resistance from departments or students regarding changes in learning patterns and mobility policies for a maximum of 3 semesters. This research used a survey method on 357 active students of the MBKM program, Universitas Negeri Malang Indonesia. The survey covers two main parameters: program suitability with graduate learning outcomes and partner alignment with program objectives. The survey results show that MBKM has provided positive changes at the institutional level. Empirical studies and survey results show that student-centered learning through various learning activities provides a more meaningful understanding of content. Referring to increasingly complex programs, it is recommended to form a special team to accompany the MBKM in managing and developing the program so that the existing unit can focus on academic administration services.

References

  1. Archer, L. (2007). Diversity, equality and higher education: A critical reflection on the ab/uses of equity discourse within widening participation. Teach. High. Educ., 12(5–6), pp. 635–653, doi: 10.1080/13562510701595325.

  2. Askham, P. (2008). Context and identity: Exploring adult learners’ experiences of higher education. J. Furth. High. Educ., 32(1), pp. 85–97, doi: 10.1080/03098770701781481.

  3. Bakhshi, H. and J. Mateos-Garcia (2016), “New Data for Innovation Policy”, NESTA

  4. Baxter, S., & Gray, C. (2001). The application of student centered learning approaches to clinical education. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders: Supplement, 36, 396-400.

  5. Brown, J. K. (2008). Student-centered instruction: Involving students in their education. Music Educators Journal, 94(5), 30-35.

  6. Carnell, E. (2007). Conceptions of effective teaching in higher education: Extending the boundaries. Teach. High. Educ., 12(1), pp. 25–40, doi: 10.1080/13562510601102081.

  7. Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G., and Merritt, A. (2014). Connecting Student Learning at University with Professional Practice Using Rich Media in Practice-Based Curricula. in Gosper, Maree. and Ifenthaler, Dirk. Curriculum Design for the Twenty-First Century: Using Learning Technologies in Higher Education. Springer link

  8. Earl, L. and H. Timperley (2015), “Evaluative thinking for successful educational innovation”,

  9. Grove, N., & Bretz, S. L. (2007). CHEMX: An instrument to assess students’ cognitive expectations for learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(9), 1524-1529

  10. Halili, S. H. (2019). Technological advancements in education 4.0. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 63–69. https://tojdel.net/journals/tojdel/volumes/tojdelvolume07-i01.pdf#page=70

  11. Hani, R., & Richardus, E. I. (2021). Guru milenial dan tantangan society 5.0 [Millenial teachers and the challenges of society 5.0] (M. Kika (ed.)). Andi.

  12. Hockings, C., Cooke, S., & Bowl, M. (2007). Academic engagement’ within a widening participation context - A 3D analysis. Teach. High. Educ.,12(5-6), doi: 10.1080/13562510701596323.

  13. Huett, J.B., Kalinowski, K.E., Moller, L., & Huett, K.C. (2008). Improving the motivation and retention of online students through arcs-based e-mails. Int. J. Phytoremediation, 21(1), pp. 159–176, 2008, doi: 10.1080/08923640802224451.

  14. Iannelli, C. (2007). Inequalities in Entry to Higher Education: a Comparison Over Time between Scotland and England and Wales. High. Educ. Q., 61(3), pp. 306–333, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00357.x.

  15. Isikoglu, N., Basturk, R., & Karaca, F. (2009). Assessing in-service teachers' instructional beliefs about student-centered education: A Turkish perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 350-356.

  16. Ismail, A., Hassan, W. A. S. W., Ahmad, F., Affan, Z., & Harun, M. I. (2020). Students’ readiness in facing industrial revolution 4.0 among students of technical teacher’s education. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(8), 300–305. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/aug2020/Students-Readiness-In-Facing-IndustrialRevolution-40-Among-Students-Of-Technical-Teachers-Education.pdf

  17. Jeffries, P. R., Rew, S., & Cramer, J. M. (2002). A comparison of student-centered versus traditional methods of teaching basic nursing skills in a learning laboratory. Nursing Education Perspectives, 23(1), 14-19.

  18. Kilic, A. (2010). Learner-centered micro teaching in teacher education. International Journal of Instruction, 3(1), 77-100.

  19. Lowe, H., & Cook, A. (2003). Mind the Gap: Are students prepared for higher education?. J. Furth. High. Educ., 27(1), pp. 53–76, doi: 10.1080/03098770305629.

  20. Makridakis, S. (2017). The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures, 90, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006

  21. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 122, OECD Publishing, Paris

  22. Shu-Hui, H. C., & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of interaction in a learner- centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 407-426

  23. Sugiarto, S. (2019). Kesiapan kepala madrasah aliyah swasta menyelenggarakan pendidikan pada era revolusi industri 4.0 di Kabupaten Sumbawa Besar [Readiness of heads of madrasah Aliyah to provide education in the era of industrial revolution 4.0 in Sumbawa Besar Regency]. Jurnal Kependidikan, 4(1), 37–45. http://www.e-journallppmunsa.ac.id/index.php/kependidikan/article/view/14

  24. Susanti, E., Rifa’atul Maulidah, & Yanti Sofi Makiyah. (2019). Peran guru fisika di era revolusi industri 4.0 [The role of physics teachers in the era of industrial revolution 4.0]. Diffraction : Journal for Physics Education and Applied Physics, 1(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.37058/diffraction.v1i1.810

  25. Talaviya, T., Shah, D., Patel, N., Yagnik, H., & Shah, M. (2020). Implementation of artificial intelligence in agriculture for optimisation of irrigation and application of pesticides and herbicides. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 4, 58-73.

  26. Tärnvik, A. (2007). Revival of the case method: A way to retain student-centered learning in a post-PBL era. Medical Teacher, 29(1), 32-36

  27. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

  28. Yuliati, Y., & Saputra, D. S. (2019). Pembelajaran sains di era revolusi industri 4.0 [Science learning in the era of industrial revolution 4.0]. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 5(2), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v5i2.1389.

bottom of page