Situational Interest and Its Sources: A Comparison Between Expressed and Observed Situational Interest about Heat Transfer
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 30 April 2021

Situational Interest and Its Sources: A Comparison Between Expressed and Observed Situational Interest about Heat Transfer

Umit Duruk

Adiyaman University, Turkey

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.04.02.277

Pages: 676-690

Keywords: Science Education, Observed Situational Interest, Expressed Situational Interest, Heat Transfer, Middle School Students

Abstract

Latest studies on situational interest (SI) point out that the expressed situational interest (ESI) and observed situational interest (OSI) of students that emerge during science courses differentiate from each other. However, the studies aiming to determine this difference are rare. Accordingly, the purpose of this qualitative case study is to compare the ESI and OSI of middle school students emerging during a science course and determine what type of sources these students show in relation to their SI changes. Turkish six-graders (N= 30, age 11–12 years) participated in a heat transfer course, and this course was video-recorded. The SI of the students was measured repeatedly in different sequences and periods of the course and examined by combining student self-evaluations and observations from the video recordings. As a result of the study, it was observed that although the SI of the students increased especially during hands-on activities, it decreased in general towards the end of the course, ESI and OSI differentiated with time, and the prominent sources included novelty, personal relevance, concreteness and engagement.

References

  1. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545

  2. Ayotte-Beaudet, J. P., Potvin, P., & Riopel, M. (2019). Factors related to middle-school students’ situational interest in science in outdoor lessons in their schools’ immediate surroundings. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 14(1), 13-32.

  3. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544-559.

  4. Blankenburg, J. S., Höffler, T. N., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Fostering today what is needed tomorrow: Investigating students’ interest in science. Science Education, 100(2), 364-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21204

  5. Bølling, M., Hartmeyer, R., & Bentsen, P. (2019). Seven place-conscious methods to stimulate situational interest in science teaching in urban environments. Education 3-13, 47(2), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2017.1420096

  6. Dierks, P. O., Höffler, T. N., Blankenburg, J. S., Peters, H., & Parchmann, I. (2016). Interest in science: A RIASEC-based analysis of students’ interests. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 238-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1138337

  7. Dohn, N. B. (2011). Situational interest of high school students who visit an aquarium. Science Education, 95(2), 337-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20425

  8. Dohn, N. B. (2013). Upper secondary students’ situational interest: A case study of the role of a zoo visit in a biology class. International Journal of Science Education, 35(16), 2732-2751. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.628712

  9. Dohn, N. B., Madsen, P. T., & Malte, H. (2009). The situational interest of undergraduate students in zoophysiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 33(3), 196-201. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00038.2009

  10. Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.597

  11. Duruk, U. (2020). Investigating students’ scientific creativity and metacognitive awareness level according to RIASEC Interest Inventory. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(5), 1-20. 10.5281/zenodo.3831123

  12. Duruk, U., Akgün, A., & Güngörmez, H. G. (2021). Exploring the impact of common knowledge construction model on students’ understandings of heat transfer. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(1), 114-136.

  13. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316.

  14. Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001

  15. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

  16. Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743-757. 10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0

  17. Kang, H., Scharmann, L. C., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(4), 483–405.

  18. Knogler, M., Harackiewicz, J. M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Lewalter, D. (2015). How situational is situational interest? Investigating the longitudinal structure of situational interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.004

  19. Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 383-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1

  20. Lin, H. S., Hong, Z. R., & Chen, Y. C. (2013). Exploring the development of college students' situational interest in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2152-2173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.818261

  21. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 647-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355699

  22. Logtenberg, A., Van Boxtel, C., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2011). Stimulating situational interest and student questioning through three types of historical introductory texts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(2), 179-198. 10.1007/s10212-010-0041-6

  23. Loukomies, A., Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2015). Investigating situational interest in primary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 37(18), 3015-3037. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1119909

  24. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

  25. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications.

  26. Palmer, D. (2004). Situational interest and the attitudes towards science of primary teacher education students. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 895-908. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000177262

  27. Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20263

  28. Palmer, D. H., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2016). Identifying underlying causes of situational interest in a science course for preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 100(6), 1039-1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21244

  29. Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173-195). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50009-7

  30. Renninger, K. A., & Su, S. (2012). Interest and its development. In R. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 167 – 187). New York: Oxford University Press.

  31. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: A measure for students' general motivational beliefs and learning strategies?. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (De La Salle University Manila), 19(2).

  32. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.002

  33. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2017). Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.02.003

  34. Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2018). How individual interest influences situational interest and how both are related to knowledge acquisition: A microanalytical investigation. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(5), 530-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1310710

  35. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.

  36. Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. T. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.175

  37. Schraw, G., Flowerday, T., & Lehman, S. (2001). Increasing situational interest in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 211-224.

  38. Silvia, P. J. (2008). Interest—The curious emotion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00548.x

  39. Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British journal of educational technology, 43(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x

  40. Tapola, A., Veermans, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Predictors and outcomes of situational interest during a science learning task. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1047-1064. 10.1007/s11251-013-9273-6

  41. Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Cripps Clark, J. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.

  42. Vongkulluksn, V. W., Matewos, A. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Marsh, J. A. (2018). Motivational factors in makerspaces: A mixed methods study of elementary school students’ situational interest, self-efficacy, and achievement emotions. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0129-0

bottom of page