Probing High School Students’ Understanding of Einstein’s Theory of Gravity Using Thought Experiments and Analogy
top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 28 December 2020

Probing High School Students’ Understanding of Einstein’s Theory of Gravity Using Thought Experiments and Analogy

Yohanes Sudarmo Dua, Rambu Ririnsia HarraHau, Agustina Elizabeth

Nusa Nipa University, Indonesia

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.03.04.164

Pages: 587-597

Keywords: Einstein’s Theory of Gravity, Thought Experiments, Analogy, Students’ Understanding

Abstract

In this study, we probed high school students’ understanding of Einstein’s theory of gravity by implementing an approach which mainly consists of two steps: firstly, exposing students to TEs describing the Equivalence Principle; secondly, applying the analogy of parallel lines on a curved surface with the path of two falling balls in a real gravitational field to help students deduce the idea of gravity as the spacetime curvature. A total of 12 high school students voluntarily participated in this study where data regarding their understanding were measured by means of an identical pen-and-paper test and interviews. Even though none of the students could explain what the Einstein’s version of gravity is in the pre-test, their responses in the post-test indicated that the approach we applied could help them understand the Einstein’s theory of gravity. Not only could they recall what the gravity is, most of them managed to provide related analogy they have learnt to explain their thoughts. Apart from its easily comprehensible steps, the study suggested that the approach is worth adopting to teach Einstein’s theory of gravity as it reflects the similar path ever taken by Einstein when starting to formulate his theory of gravity.

References

  1. Baldy, E. (2007). A New Educational Perspective for Teaching Gravity. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (14), 1767–1788.

  2. Choudhary, R., Kraus, U., Kersting, M., Blair, D., Zahn, C., & Zadnik, M. (2019). Einsteinian Physics in the Classroom: Integrating Physical and Digital Learning Resources in the Context of an International Research Collaboration. The Physics Educator, 1 (4).

  3. Dua, Y. S., Blair, D., Kaur, T., & Choudhary, R. (2020). Can Einstein's Theory of General Relativity be Taught to Indonesian High School Students? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 50-58.

  4. Einstein, A. (2005). RELATIVITY: The Special and General Theory, Translated by Robert W Lawson, Introduction by Roger Penrose, Commentary by Robert Geroch, with a Historical Essay by David C. Cassidy. New York: Pi Press.

  5. Foppoli, A., Choudhary, R., Blair, D., Kaur, T., Moschilla, J., & Zadnik, M. (2018). Public and teacher response to Einsteinian physics in schools. Physics Education.

  6. Galili, I. (2009). Thought Experiments: Determining Their Meaning. Science & Education, 1-23.

  7. Janis, A. I. (2018). On Mass, Spacetime Curvature, and Gravity. Phys. Teach. , 12-13.

  8. Kaur, T., Blair, D., Moschilla, J., Stannard, W., & Zadnik, M. (2017). Teaching Einsteinian physics at schools: part 1, models and analogies for relativity. Physics Education.

  9. Kaur, T., Blair, D., Stannard, W., Treagust, D., Venville, G., Zadnik, M., et al. (2018). Determining the Intelligibility of Einsteinian Concepts with Middle School Students. Research in Science Education.

  10. Kersting, M. (2019). Free fall in curved spacetime- how to visualise gravity in general relativity. Physics Education.

  11. Kersting, M., & Steier, R. (2018). Understanding Curved Spacetime: The Role of the Rubber Sheet Analogy in Learning General Relativity. Science and Education.

  12. Kersting, M., Bøe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., & Angell, K. (2018). General relativity in upper secondary school: Design and evaluation of an online learning environment using the model of educational reconstruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research.

  13. Kraus, U., & Zahn, C. (2019). Teaching General Relativity with sector models: the field equations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series .

  14. Nobili, A., Lucchesi, D., Crosta, M., Shao, M., Turyshev, S., Peron, R., et al. (2013). On the universality of free fall, the equivalence principle, and the gravitational redshift. American Journal of Physics.

  15. Pitts, M., Venville, G., Blair, D., & Zadnik, M. (2013). An Exploratory Study to Investigate the Impact of an Enrichment Program on Aspects of EinsteinianPhysics on Year 6 Students. Research in Science Education(RISE).

  16. Pössel, M. (2005). Gravity: from weightlessness to curvature. Retrieved July 24, 2020, from Einstein Online: https://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlight/geometry_force/

  17. Pössel, M. (2018). Relatively complicated? Using models to teach general relativity at different levels.arXiv:1812.11589v1.

  18. Pössel, M. (2005). The elevator, the rocket, and gravity: the equivalence principle. Retrieved July 13, 2020, from Einstein Online: https://www.einstein-online.info/en/spotlight/equivalence_principle/

  19. Price, R. H. (2016). Spatial curvature, spacetime curvature, and gravity. American Journal of Physics.

  20. Schutz, B. (2003). Gravity from the ground up  New York Cambridge University Press.

  21. Silva, C. C. (2006). The Role of Models and Analogies in theElectromagnetic Theory: A Historical Case Study. Science & Education

  22. Stannard, W., Blair, D., Zadnik, M., & Kaur, T. (2016). Why did the apple fall? A new model to explain Einstein's gravity. European Journal of Physics, 38 (1).

  23. Stinner, A., & Metz, D. (2006). Thought Experiment, Einstein, and Physics Education. Phys.Can, 62 (6), 361–372.

  24. Taylor, E. F., & Wheeler, A. J. (2000). Exploring Black Holes, Introduction to General Relativity. New York City: Addison Wesley Longman.

  25. Taylor, E. F., & Wheeler, A. J. (1991). SPACETIME PHYSICS, Introduction to Special Relativity. New York City: W . H. Freeman and Company.

  26. Thorne, K. S. (1994). Black Holes & Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy. New York City: ‎W. W. Norton & Company.

  27. Treagust, D., & Duit, R. (2012). Conceptual Change Learning and Teaching. In the art of Teaching Science for middle and secondary school (pp. 41-59). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

  28. Velentzas, A., & Halkia, K. (2013). The Use of Thought Experiments in Teaching Physics to Upper Secondary-Level Students: Two Examples from the Theory of Relativity. International Journal of Science Education  35(18).

  29. Velentzas, A., Halkia, K., & Skordoulis, C. (2007). Thought Experiments in the Theory of Relativity and in Quantum Mechanics: Their Presence in Textbooks and in Popular Science Books. Science & Education 16 (3).

  30. Wheeler, J. A. (1990). A Journey into Gravity and Spacetime .W.H.Freeman & Co Ltd.

  31. Zahn, C., & Kraus, U. (2014). Sector models—A toolkit for teaching general relativity: I. Curved spaces and spacetimes. European Journal of Physics  35 (5).

  32. Zahn, C., & Kraus, U. (2018). Sector models—a toolkit for teaching general relativity: II. Geodesics. European Journal of Physics ,40 (1).

bottom of page