top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 24 October 2022

Needs Analysis for the Development of Mathematics Statistics I-Module Based on Schematic Representation

Rahmad Bustanul Anwar, Dwi Rahmawati

Muhammadiyah University of Metro

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.575

Pages: 96-100

Keywords: E-Module, Mathematical Statistics I, Schematic Representation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the need to develop a teaching material needed in mathematics statistics lectures I. This study used a qualitative descriptive method oriented to the development of a product. The subjects of this study were fourth semester mathematics education students who were taking mathematics statistics course I and lecturers of the mathematics education study program at the Muhammadiyah University of Metro. The research instrument used a questionnaire distributed using a google form. Data analysis was carried out with the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results obtained in this study are: 1) 61.5% of respondents stated that in mathematics statistics I lectures the lecturers have not used e-modules.

References

  1. Amorapanth, P., Kranjec, A., Bromberger, B., Lehet, M., Widick, P., Woods, A.J., Kimberg, D.Y., Chatterjee, A. (2011). Language, Perception, and the Schematic Representation of Spatial Relations. Brain Lang. 120, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.09.007

  2. Anderson, R. H. (1987). Pemilihan dan Pengembangan Media untuk Pembelajaran [Selection and Development of Media for Learning]. Jakarta.

  3. Anwar, R.B., Rahmawati, D. (2017). Symbolic and Verbal Representation Process of Student in Solving Mathematics Problem Based Polya’s Stages. Int. Educ. Stud. 10, 20.

  4. Anwar, B.R. Rahmawati, D., & Widjajanti, K. (2019). Schematic Representation: How Students Creating It?. Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 1-21.

  5. As’ari, A., R. (2016). Tantangan Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru dalam Rangka Membelajarkan Matematika di Abad-21 dan Membangun Karakter Peserta Didik [The Challenge of Developing Teacher Professionalism in the Context of Teaching Mathematics in the 21st Century and Building Students' Character]. Proceedings of the National Seminar. 43-56.

  6. Bal, A.P. (2014). The Examination of Representations used by Classroom Teacher Candidates in Solving Mathematical Problems. Educ. Sci. Theory Pract. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.6.2189

  7. Boonen, A. J. H., van Wesel, F., Jolles, J., van der Schoot, M. (2014). The Role of Visual Representation Type, Spatial Ability, and Reading Comprehension in Word Problem Solving: An Item-Level Analysis in Elementary School Children. Int. J. Educ. Res. 68, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.08.001

  8. Diezmann, C. M., English, L. D. (2001). Promoting the Use of Diagrams as Tools for Thinking, in: Cuoco, A.A. (Ed.), 2001 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook: The Role of Representation in School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 77–89.

  9. Dirto. (2021). Modul dan Buku Cetak, Apa Perbedaannya? [Modules and Printed Books, What's the Difference?].  https://pusdiklat.perpusnas.go.id/berita/read/71/modul-dan-buku-cetak-apa-perbedaannya

  10. Fagnant, A., & Vlassis, J. (2013). Schematic Representations in Arithmetical Problem Solving: Analysis of Their Impact on Grade 4 Students. Educational Studies in Mathematics 84:149–168 DOI 10.1007/s10649-013-9476-4.

  11. Flevares, L. M., Perry, M. (2001). How Many Do You See? The Use of Nonspoken Representations in First-Grade Mathematics Lessons. J. Educ. Psychol. 93, 330–45.

  12. Ghavifekr, S., Athirah, W., & Rosdy, W. (2015). Teaching and Learning with Technology: Effectiveness of ICT Integration in School. International Journal of Research in Education and Scince (IJRES) International Journal of Research in Education and Science E, 1(2), 175-191.

  13. Goldin, G. A., (1998). Representational Systems, Learning, and Problem Solving in Mathematics. J. Math. Behav., Representations and the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Part II 17, 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80056-1

  14. Hegarty, M. & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of Visual-Spatial Representations and Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 1999, Vol. 91, No. 4,684-689.

  15. Istiyanto (2021). Pengertian dan Karakteristik Modul dalam Pembelajaran [Understanding and Characteristics of Modules in Learning]. http://istiyanto.com/pengertian-dan-karakteristik-modul-dalam-pembelajaran/

  16. Lesh, R., Post, T., Behr, M. (1987). Representations and Translations among Representations in Mathematics Learning and Problem Solving. In C. Janvier, (Ed.), Problems of Representations in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. URL http://www.cehd.umn.edu/ci/rationalnumberproject/87_5.html (accessed 3.12.18).

  17. Miura, I., T. (2001). The Influence of Language on Mathematical Representations. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The Roles of Representation in School Mathematics (pp. 1-23). Reston, VA: NCTM.

  18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (Ed.), (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA

  19. Putra, K. W. B., Wirawan, I. M. A., & Pradnyana, G. A. (2017). Pengembangan E Modul Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Pada Mata Pelajaran “Sistem Komputer” Untuk Siswa Kelas X Multimedia SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja [Development of E-Module Based on Discovery Learning Learning Model on “Computer Systems” Subject for Class X Multimedia Students at SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja]. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. 14 (1), 40. 58- 72.

  20. Prasetiyowati, Y., & Tandyonomanu, D. (2015). Pengembangan Modul Elektronik pada Mata Pelajaran Animasi 3 Dimensi Materi Pokok Pemodelan Objek 3D Kelas XI Multimedia untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar di SMK Negeri 1 Magetan [Development of Electronic Modules in 3 Dimensional Animation Subjects 3D Object Modeling for Class XI Multimedia to Improve Learning Outcomes at SMK Negeri 1 Magetan]. Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan, Vol. 6, No. 2.

  21. Prastowo, A. (2012). Pengembangan Sumber Belajar [Learning Resources Development]. Yogyakarta: Pedagogia

  22. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. MIT Press.

  23. Thevenot, C., & Barrouillet, P., (2015). Arithmetic Word Problem Solving and Mental Representations. Oxf. Handb. Numer. Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.04.

  24. Salkind, G. M. (2007). Mathematical representations. George Mason University EDCI 857

  25. VandenBos, G. R. (Ed.), (2015). APA Dictionary of Psychology (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association, Washington. https://doi.org/10.1037/14646-000

  26. Villegas, J. L., Castro, E., Gutierrez, J. (2009). Representations in Problem Solving: A Case Study with Optimization Problems. Electron. J. Res. Educ. Psychol. 7, 279–308.

  27. Zahner, D., Corter, J. E. (2010). The Process of Probability Problem Solving: Use of External Visual Representations. Math. Think. Learn. 12, 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986061003654240

bottom of page