Education Quarterly Reviews
ISSN 2621-5799
Published: 20 February 2025
Evolution of Program Evaluation: A Historical Analysis of Leading Theorists’ Views and Influences
Metin Kuş
Hitit University, Turkey
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1993.08.01.561
Pages: 142-155
Keywords: Program Evaluation, Historical Analysis, Theorists, Evaluation Models
Abstract
Program evaluation has undergone significant evolution, shaped by diverse theoretical perspectives and influential scholars. This study provides a historical analysis of leading theorists’ views and their impact on the field, tracing key developments from early accountability-focused models to contemporary, context-sensitive approaches. Beginning with foundational contributions from figures such as Tyler and Scriven, the analysis explores how theorists like Stake, Patton, and Stufflebeam have expanded the scope of evaluation through responsive, utilization-focused, and CIPP. The study highlights shifts from positivist, objective-oriented models to more participatory and stakeholder-centered frameworks, reflecting broader changes in educational and social science research paradigms. By examining the intellectual tradition and methodological shifts, this study provides insights into how program evaluation has adapted to evolving societal, institutional, and policy demands. Understanding these historical influences offers valuable perspectives for future advancements in evaluation practice and theory.
References
AEA (1994). Guiding Principles For Evaluators.
Alkin, M.C. (2013). Evaluation Roots A Wider Perspective of Theorists’ Views and Influences. 2nd Edition. SAGE.University of California, Los Angeles.
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (8th ed.). Pearson.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.DOI:10.3316/QRJ0902027
Cronbach, L. J., & Suppes, P. (1969). The evaluation of educational programs. In L. J. Cronbach & P. Suppes (Eds.), Research for tomorrow's schools: Disciplined inquiry for education. Macmillan.
Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. Jossey-Bass.
Eguchi, A. (2014). Educational Robotics for Promoting 21st Century Skills. Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, 8(1), 5–11. DOI:10.14313/JAMRIS_1-2014/1
Fetterman, D.M. (1994). Empowerment Evaluation. Evaluation Practice 15(1),1-15 DOI:10.1016/0886-1633(94)90055-8
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson.
Hood, S., Hopson, R., Kirkhart, K.E. (2016). Culturally Responsive Evaluation. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. DOI:10.1002/9781119171386.ch12
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. SAGE Publications.
Jacob, S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Evaluation: From Augmented to Automated Evaluation. Digital Government: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696009
Jamieson, V., & Azzam, T. (2012). The Use of Technology in Evaluation Practice. Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation, 8(18), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v8i18.340
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson.
McLeish, T., & Strang, V. (2016). Evaluating interdisciplinary research: the elephant in the peer-reviewers’ room. Palgrave Commun 2, https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.55
Nagel, S. S. (1990). Bridging theory and practice in policy/program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning,13(3),275-283.
Patton, M. Q. (1997). Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. SAGE Publications.
Preskill, H., & Torres, R. T. (1999). Evaluative Inquiry for Learning in Organizations. Sage Publications.
Rao, V. & Woolcock, M. (2011). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Program Evaluation.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2019). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Rand McNally.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. SAGE Publications.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Polity Press.
Stake, R. E. (1975). The countenance of evaluation. In R. E. Stake (Ed.), Handbook of evaluation research. SAGE Publications.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. Jossey-Bass.
Tosh, J. (2015). The Pursuit of History: Aims, Methods, and New Directions in the Study of History. London: Routledge.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies. Prentice Hall.
Vo, T. K. A. (2018). Evaluation models in educational programs: Strengths and weaknesses. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34 (2), 140-150.