Education Quarterly Reviews
ISSN 2621-5799
Published: 16 October 2024
Academic Administration to Develop Proactive Learning Management for Teachers in Sarasas Affiliated Schools
Patthana Rotrut, Anusorn Nampradit
Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology
Download Full-Text Pdf
10.31014/aior.1993.07.04.526
Pages: 83-95
Keywords: Academic Administration, Proactive Learning Management
Abstract
This research aimed to: 1) study the current state, desired state, and necessary needs in academic administration to develop proactive learning management for teachers in Sarasas affiliated schools, and 2) explore approaches to academic administration for enhancing proactive learning management among teachers in Sarasas schools. The sample group consisted of 159 Sarasas school administrators. The research tools included questionnaires, interviews, and content analysis. The reliability of the current state assessment was 0.975, and the desired state assessment was 0.959. Data was analyzed using basic statistics such as percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The assessment of necessary needs in academic administration to develop proactive learning management for teachers in Sarasas-affiliated schools was conducted using the Modified Priority Needs Index (PNImodified) to rank needs. The current state of academic administration to develop proactive learning management for teachers in Sarasas affiliated schools was generally at a high level. When considering individual aspects, the highest average score was in evaluation and assessment, while the lowest was in curriculum development. The desired state of academic administration to develop proactive learning management for teachers in Sarasas-affiliated schools was also at a high level. The aspect with the highest average score was teaching and learning management, and the lowest was curriculum development. The ranking of necessary needs for academic administration to develop proactive learning management for teachers in Sarasas affiliated schools, from most to least needed, was curriculum development, teaching and learning management, and evaluation and assessment. The approaches to academic administration to develop proactive learning management for teachers in Sarasas affiliated schools included: for curriculum development, establishing a curriculum committee, analyzing the school context, setting goals to adjust the curriculum structure, studying theories, promoting competence development for future readiness, adding courses that align with local arts, culture, and community needs, conduct research to improve efficiency, and monitor teaching outcomes; for teaching and learning management, understand student needs, adjust teaching according to different groups, encourage diverse activities, create a confident learning environment, stimulate thinking through questions and experiments, provide feedback, and evaluate progress; for evaluation and assessment, develop assessment tools, conduct continuous evaluations, use feedback to improve transparency, and enhance teachers' skills.
References
Anusit Phanklam & Team. (2017). Learner-Centered Teaching Management (Master of Education). Mahidol University.
Anusit Phanklam & Team. (2017). Results of Using Active Learning to Enhance English Speaking Skills for Teacher Professional Students. Proceedings of the 4th National Academic Conference. Research Institute, Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University.
Anusorn Nampadit. (2023). Innovative Leadership Theories and Practices for Developing School Administrators in the Sarasas Affiliated Schools. Journal of Mahamakut Buddhist University Lanna Campus.
Brickner, D. R., & Etter, E. R. (2008). Strategies for promoting active learning in a Principles of Accounting course. Journal of Accounting and Finance.
Jamais Cascio (2020). The BANI World: A new lens for understanding a changing world. Institute for the Future. Retrieved from IFTN.org.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Documentation of the Meeting on Planning for the 2023 Academic Year. (2023). Sarasas School Network Archive.
IBM Corp. (2021). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. IBM Corp.
Janyarak Kunphuang, & Team. (2016). Designing Learning Outcome Assessments to Improve Educational Quality. In National Conference on Educational Management Aligned with Educational Policies. Bangkok: National University.
Jarunee Kaeo-eian. (2014). Techniques for Academic Administration in Educational Institutions: Strategies and Guidelines for Professional Administrators. Songkhla: Suburban Printing.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Kwankaow Choomkasornkulkit. (2017). Academic Administration Guidelines for Enhancing Students' Analytical Thinking Skills in Schools Under the Pathum Thani Primary Education Service Area Office 1 (Master of Education). Chulalongkorn University.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology.
Maneerat Saengaroon. (2021). Quantitative and Qualitative Research in Educational Research. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.
Ministry of Education. (2004). National Education Act of 1999 (4th ed.). Bangkok: Government Printing Office.
Ministry of Education. (2004). Research Report on the Development of Lifelong Education. Bangkok: Educational Printing House.
Ministry of Education. (2022). Guidelines for Educational Development to Enhance 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.th/
National Education Act. (2008). Basic Education Core Curriculum. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2018). Policies for enhancing educational quality in Thailand. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2018). Guidelines for Proactive Learning Management. Bangkok: Office of the Basic Education Commission.
Phitchaya Chanta. (2020). School Curriculum Development (Master of Education). Kasetsart University.
Pipat Kaewbua. (2021). Using the STEAM Design Process in Teaching and Learning Development. Educational Research Journal, 22(3), 112-125.
Pongsak Phakamart & Darunee Panjarattanakorn. (2023). Guidelines for Competency-Based Education Assessment for Enhancing Educational Quality in 21st Century Thailand. Journal of International Creative Entrepreneurs College Rattanakosin, Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin, 2(1).
Pramez Charoenuch. (2022). Exploring proactive learning management strategies in schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(4), 245-259.
Promes Chroynuch. (2022). Academic Administration in Schools for Educational Quality Improvement. Basic Education Journal.
Promes Chroynuch. (2022). Learner-Centered Learning Management (Master of Education). Chiang Mai University.
Smith, J. (2021). Modified Priority Needs Index (PNImodified): A tool for educational assessment. Educational Research Publishing.
Sukanya Chaemchoi. (2022). Academic Administration in Schools (Master of Education). Thammasat University.
Suwimon Wongwanich. (2015). Assessing and Ranking the Necessary Needs for Curriculum Development. Educational Journal.
Thanatta Khunsuk. (2022). Effective Assessment in Education (Master of Education). Bangkok University.
Thepprasit Lertkiatseree. (2019). Teaching Management for Developing Students' Analytical Thinking Skills. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press.
Turner, R. C., & Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of item-objective congruence for multidimensional items. International Journal of Testing
Wasana Ditpradub. (2021). The Use of Administrative Power and Academic Administration in Schools Under the Phetchaburi Secondary Education Service Area Office.
Document of the Planning Meeting for Learning Management Preparation for the 2023 Academic Year in SarasasAffiliated Schools.