top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 25 April 2023

Enhancing High School Students' Understanding of Plant Diversity through an Innovative and Engaging Educational Card Game

Ariya Suriyabutr, Pratchayapong Yasri

Mahidol University (Thailand), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (Thailand)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.06.02.738

Pages: 67-77

Keywords: Card Game, Plant Diversity, Self-Determination Theory, Game-Based Learning

Abstract

One of the fundamental components of science education in Thailand and other regions is the study of plant diversity. Nevertheless, students' lack of interest in this topic may be due to its overwhelming content and the perceived disconnection to their daily lives. To address this issue, an educational card game that incorporates concepts of plant taxonomy, distinctive characteristics, phylum, and several examples of local plants was developed to provide a more engaging, relevant, and conceptually appropriate approach to learning. An investigation of students' conceptual understanding before and after playing the card game, as well as their motivation towards the intrinsic value of the learning, was undertaken to assess the efficacy of the developed card game. The results of the study revealed that students' participation in the activity led to an increase in conceptual knowledge and a heightened degree of internalisation in motivation. As such, it is recommended that teachers incorporate the use of this educational card game in their curriculum to enhance students' understanding and appreciation of the topic of plant diversity.

References

  1. Basey, J. M., Maines, A. P., Francis, C. D., & Melbourne, B. (2014). An evaluation of two hands-on lab styles for plant biodiversity in undergraduate biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0062

  2. Bebbington, A. (2005). The ability of A-level students to name plants. Journal of Biological Education, 39(2), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655963

  3. Brosi, S. L., & Huish, R. D. (2014). Aligning Plant Identification Curricula to Disciplinary Standards Through the Framework of Student-Centered Learning. In Innovative Strategies for Teaching in the Plant Sciences (pp. 83–100). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0422-8_6

  4. Christopher P., N., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

  5. Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2010). Development and Initial Psychometric Assessment of the Plant Attitude Questionnaire. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9207-x

  6. Gibson, A. K., Drown, D. M., & Lively, C. M. (2015). The Red Queen’s Race: An Experimental Card Game to Teach Coevolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 8, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-015-0039-2

  7. Gutierrez, A. F. (2014). Development and effectiveness of an educational card game as supplementary material in understanding selected topics in biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-05-0093

  8. Kirchoff, B. K., Delaney, P. F., Horton, M., & Dellinger-Johnston, R. (2014). Optimizing learning of scientific category knowledge in the classroom: The case of plant identification. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-11-0224

  9. Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2002). The Influence of an Educational Program on Children’s Perception of Biodiversity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 33(2), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960209600805

  10. Lückmann, K., & Menzel, S. (2014). Herbs versus trees: Influences on teenagers’ knowledge of plant species. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.837404

  11. Maleesut, T., Piyawattanaviroj, P., & Yasri, P. (2019). Gen X STEM Teachers' Perceived Usefulness and Challenges of a Blended-Learning System. In J. Kutaka-Kennedy (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 104-106). https://doi.org/10.1145/3345120.3345166

  12. Piyawattanaviroj, P., Maleesut, T., & Yasri, P. (2019). An educational card game for enhancing students' learning of the periodic table. In J. Kutaka-Kennedy (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 380-383). https://doi.org/10.1145/3345120.3345165

  13. Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656105

  14. Punyasettro, S., & Yasri, P. (2021). A game-based learning activity to promote conceptual understanding of chordates’ phylogeny and self-efficacy to learn evolutionary biology. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1937-1951. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1937

  15. Randler, C. (2008). Teaching species identification - A prerequisite for learning biodiversity and understanding ecology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4, 223–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75344

  16. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

  17. Seangdeang K. & Yasri P. (2019). Enhance lower secondary students’ scientific literacy and conceptual understanding of tonicity through blended learning. In: Cheung S., Jiao J., Lee LK., Zhang X., Li K., Zhan Z. (eds), Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations. ICTE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1048. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9895-7_4

  18. Stagg, B. C., & Donkin, M. (2013). Teaching botanical identification to adults: experiences of the UK participatory science project “Open Air Laboratories.” Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.764341

  19. Su, T., Cheng, M. T., & Lin, S. H. (2014). Investigating the effectiveness of an educational card game for learning how human immunology is regulated. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13, 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-10-0197

  20. Threekunprapa, A., & Yasri, P. (2020). Unplugged coding using flowblocks for promoting computational thinking and programming among secondary school students. International Journal of Instruction. 13(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13314a

  21. Threekunprapa, A., & Yasri, P. (2021). The role of augmented reality-based unplugged computer programming approach in the effectiveness of computational thinking. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(3), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2021.116506

bottom of page