top of page
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute
Asian Institute of Research, Journal Publication, Journal Academics, Education Journal, Asian Institute

Education Quarterly Reviews

ISSN 2621-5799

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
crossref
doi
open access

Published: 07 November 2024

“Prominent” Epistemology in Reference Books of Islamic Education at Islamic Higher Education Institutions in Indonesia: Retracing Justificative Reasoning

Sabarudin, Mahmud Arif, Moh. Roqib, Syarnubi, Mardeli

Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga (Indonesia), Universitas Islam Negeri SAIZU Purwokerto (Indonesia), Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang (Indonesia)

asia institute of research, journal of education, education journal, education quarterly reviews, education publication, education call for papers
pdf download

Download Full-Text Pdf

doi

10.31014/aior.1993.07.04.530

Pages: 136-146

Keywords: Reference Books, Epistemological Content, Justificative Reasoning, Stagnation, Lecturer’s View

Abstract

The reference books used influence academic and learning activities at the university. Consequently, reference books are vital in determining the various types of epistemological content. Accordingly, reference books serve epistemic and authoritative functions for academic actualization and instructional activities. In such cases, reference books are perceived as ideal and influential texts. Through literary research that applies textual analysis and is confirmed by interviews with lecturers who use reference books, it can be known that the selected reference books that Indonesian writers have written are generally still characterized by normative-reproductive nuances. The normative nuances are indicated by textual, analogical, and declarative reasoning, while the reproductive nuances are shown by their poor contextual relevance and justificatory model. Additionally, these books cannot endorse significant intellectual discourses because of their repetitive tendencies. However, in that case, a slight shift was found. Its implication, the concept of Islamic education still tends to remain stagnant or in static motion as there is no firm endorsement made by empirical research, critical paradigms, and progressive formulation. The lecturers also affirm that tendency through their critical evaluation, and they hope that existing reference books can encourage empirical studies, critical reasoning, and contextual response.

References

  1. Abdullah, M. A. (2017). Islamic Studies in Higher Education in Indonesia: Challenges, Impact and Prospects for the World community. Al-Jami’ah Journal of Islamic Studies, 55(2), 391-426. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2017.552.391-426

  2. Abdullah, M. A. (2020). Multidisiplin, Interdisiplin dan Transdisiplin: Metode Studi Agama dan Studi Islam di Era Kontemporer [Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary: Methods of Religious Studies and Islamic Studies in the Contemporary Era]. Yogyakarta: IB Pustaka.

  3. al-Amili, M. M. W. (2005). Daur al-‘Aql fi Tasykîl al-Ma’rifah al-Dîniyyah [the Role of Reason in Forming Religious Sciences]. Beirut: Dar al-Hadi.

  4. Ali, S. I. (2004). al-Khithâb al-Tarbawi al-Islâmi [the Discourse of Islamic Education]. Qatar: Wazârat al-Awqâf.

  5. Ali, S. I. (2014). al-Ushûl al-Tsaqâfiyyah li al-Tarbiyah [the Cultural Foundations of Education]. Cairo: Dar al-Salam.

  6. Al-Qurtuby, S. (2021). Islam, Muslim and Anthropology. International Journal of Islamic Thought (IJIT), Vol. 20 (Dec), 138-155. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.20.2021.218

  7. Arif, M. (2019). Fundamentals of Qur’anic Education Concept: A Critical Conceptualization with Special Reference to al-Kilani’s Thought. GJAT, Vol. 9 (2), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT122019-2

  8. Ashimi, T. A. (2016). Islamic Civilization: Factors Behind Its Glory and Decline. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 9(5), 180-184. https://www.studocu.com/row/document/iqra-university/islamic-banking/1548621717093-islamic-civilization-factors-behind-its-glory-and-decline/9568579

  9. Assegaf, A. R. (2011). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam: Paradigma Baru Pendidikan  Hadhari Berbasis Integratif-Interkonektif [Philosophy of Islamic Education: A New Paradigm of Hadhari or Civilized Education Based on Integrative-Interconnective]. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

  10. Assegaf, A. R. (2019). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam Madzhab Multidisipliner [Islamic Education Multidisciplinary School]. Depok: Rajawali Press.

  11. Bagir, H. & Abdalla, U. A. (2020). Sains “Religius” Agama “Saintifik” ["Religious" Science and "Scientific" Religion]. Bandung: Mizan.

  12. Chaney, E. (2016). Religion and the Rise and Fall of Islamic Science. https://scholar.harvard.edu.

  13. Damayanti, E., Nuryamin, H. F. & Suryati. (2021). Hakikat Manusia: Perspektif Filsafat Pendidikan Islam [Human Nature: A Perspective on Islamic Educational Philosophy]. al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam & Pendidikan, Vo. 13(1), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-qalam.v13i1.612

  14. Ernst, C. W. & Martin, R. C. (eds). (2010). Rethinking Islamic Studies: From Orientalism to Cosmopolitanism. Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press.

  15. Gracia, J. J. E. (1995). A Theory of Textuality: The Logic and Epistemology. New York: State University of New York Press.

  16. Hanafi, H. (2000). Min al-Naql ila al-Ibdâ’: al-Naql [From Transmission to Creation: The Transmission], volume I. Cairo: Dar Quba’.

  17. Harb, A. (2001). al-Akhtâm al-Ushûliyyah wa al-Sya’âir al-Taqaddumiyyah [Fundamentalist stamps and Progressive Symbols]. Beirut: al-Markaz al-Tsaqafi al-‘Arabi.

  18. Hasnah, U. U. (2004). “Taqdȋm” [“Introduction”] in S.I. Ali. al-Khithâb al-Tarbawi al-Islâmi [A Discourse of Islamic Education]. Qatar: Wazârat al-Awqâf.

  19. Ilma, S., Al-Muhdhar, Irawati, M.H., Rohman, F. & Sari, M. S. (2022). Promoting Students’ metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research (IJERE), vol. 11 (1), 20-30. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22083

  20. Iqbal, M. [ed]. (2012). Studies in the Islam and Science Nexus, vol. 1, London: Ashgate.

  21. Jalaluddin & Usman, S. (1994). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam: Konsep dan Perkembangan Pemikirannya [Philosophy of Islamic Education: The Concept and Development of Its Thought]. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

  22. Jalaludin. (2017). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam Dari Zaman ke Zaman [Philosophy of Islamic Education from Age to Age]. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

  23. al-Kilani, M. I. (1987). Tathawwur Mafhûm al-Nadhariyyât al-Tarbawiyah al-Islâmiyyah [the Dynamics of Concept and Thought of Islamic Education]. Damascus: Dar Ibni Katsir.

  24. al-Kilani, M. I. (1988). Falsafat al-Tarbiyah al-Islâmiyyah.Mekah: Maktabah Hadi.

  25. Kosim, M. (2006). Kajian Historis Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia: Telaah Literatur [Historical Study of Islamic Education in Indonesia: Literature Review]. Tadris Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 1(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v1i1.192

  26. Kuntowijoyo. (2001). Muslim Tanpa Masjid [Muslims without Mosque].Bandung: Mizan.

  27. Lubis, F. A & Zohkarnain, N. A. (2023). The Othering Concept toward the Church in the Amrika Allati Ra’aytu [I have seen it]Travelogue by Sayyid Qutb. International Journal of Islamic Thought (IJIT), vol. 23 (June), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.23.2023.253

  28. Marimba, A. D. (1989). Pengantar Filsafat Pendidikan Islam [Introduction to the Philosophy of Islamic Education]. Bandung: PT. al-Ma’arif.

  29. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. London: SAGE Publications.

  30. Muhaimin. (2003). Wacana Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam [A Discourse on the Development of Islamic Education]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

  31. al-Mustiri, M. (2014). Jadal al-Ta’shîl wa al-Mu’asharah fi al-Fikr al-Islâmi [Dialectics of Authenticity and Contemporary in Islamic Thought]. Tunisia: Manshurat Karim al-Syarif.

  32. Nata, A. (2005). Filsafat Pendidikan Islam [Philosophy of Islamic Education]. Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama.

  33. Nata, A. (2010). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam [Islamic Education]. Jakarta: Kencana.

  34. Ornstein, A. C., Pajak, E. F., & Ornstein S. B. (2011). Contemporary Issues in Curriculum, edition V. Boston: Pearson.

  35. Prajawinanti, A. (2020). Pemanfaatan Buku oleh Mahasiswa sebagai Penunjang Aktivitas Akademik di Era Generasi Milenial [Using Books by Students as a Support for Academic Activities in the Millennial Generation Era]. Pustaka Karya, vol. 8(1), 25-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.18592/pk.v7i15.3757

  36. Ramayulis. (2002). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam [the Science of Islamic Education]. Jakarta: Kalam Mulia.

  37. Roqib, Moh. (2009). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam: Pengembangan Pendidikan Integratif di Sekolah, Keluarga, dan Masyarakat [the Science of Islamic Education: Development of Integrative Education in School, Family, and Community.). Yogyakarta: LKiS.

  38. Rosdakarya.

  39. Saparudin. (2013). Peta Pendidikan Islam pada Berkala Ilmiah di IAIN Mataram [Map of Islamic Education in Scientific Periodical Journals at IAIN Mataram]. Jurnal Penelitian Keislaman, vol. 9(1), 93-112.  https://doi.org/10.20414/jpk.v9i1.1794

  40. Saparudin. (2018). Gerakan Keagamaan dan Peta Afiliasi Ideologis Pendidikan Islam di  Lombok [Religious Movements and Map of Ideological Affiliation of Islamic Education in Lombok]. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 42(1), 220-241

  41. Suyatno, Watini, Sukiman & Y. Rachmawati. (2022). Progressive Islamic Education: Bridging the Gap of  Islam, Indonesianness, and Modernity. The Qualitative  Report, vol. 27(1), 226-242.  https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.4782

  42. Tafsir, A. (2001). Ilmu Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Islam [Education Science in Islamic Perspective]. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

  43. Tafsir, A. (2012). Filsafat Pendidikan Islami [Philosophy of Islamic Education]. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

  44. Usman, A. H, Abdullah, M. F. R., Kadir, M. N. A. & Iskandar, A. (2022). The Concept of an Ideal Society: A Review of Fazlur Rahman’s Perspective. International Journal of Islamic Thought (IJIT), vol.21(June), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.21.2022.220

  45. Usman, A. H, Azman, S. S & Abidin S. Z. (2017). Humanism in Islamic Education: Indonesian References. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, vol. 13(1), 95-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2017.13.1.5

bottom of page